Literature DB >> 24510202

Quantitative imaging values of CT, MR, and FDG-PET to differentiate pineal parenchymal tumors and germinomas: are they useful?

Takahide Kakigi1, Tomohisa Okada, Mitsunori Kanagaki, Akira Yamamoto, Yasutaka Fushimi, Ryo Sakamoto, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yoshiki Mikami, Taro Shimono, Jun C Takahashi, Kaori Togashi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative values of CT attenuation, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and standardized uptake value (SUV) were investigated for differentiation between pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) and germinomas. Differences in age, sex, and calcification pattern were also evaluated.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients with PPTs and germinomas in 20 years were retrospectively enrolled under the approval of the institutional review board. CT attenuation, ADC, and SUV (20, 13, and 10 patients, respectively) were statistically compared between the two tumors. Differences in sex and patterns of calcification ("exploded" or "engulfed") were also examined. Mean patient ages were compared among three groups of pineoblastoma, pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation, (PPTID) and pineocytoma and germinoma.
RESULTS: None of the quantitative values of CT attenuation, ADC, and SUV showed significant differences between PPTs and germinomas (p > .05). However, there was a significant difference in age (p < .05) among the three groups of pineoblastoma (mean age ± standard deviation 7.0 ± 8.7 years), PPTID, and pineocytoma (53.7 ± 11.4 years) and germinoma (19.1 ± 8.1 years). Sex also showed significant differences between PPTs and germinomas (p = .039). Exploded pattern of calcification was found in 9 of 11 PPT patients and engulfed pattern in 7 of 9 patients with germinomas. No reverse pattern was observed, and the patterns of calcification were considered highly specific of tumor types.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the quantitative imaging values could differentiate PPTs from germinomas. Age, sex, and calcification patterns were confirmed useful in differentiating these tumors to some degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510202     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-014-1334-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  21 in total

1.  Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components.

Authors:  Josep L Carrasco; Lluís Jover
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  From the archives of the AFIP: lesions of the pineal region: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Alice Boyd Smith; Elisabeth J Rushing; James G Smirniotopoulos
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation in adults: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Marc Pusztaszeri; Alessia Pica; Robert Janzer
Journal:  Neuropathology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.906

Review 4.  MRI of pineal region tumors.

Authors:  Y Korogi; M Takahashi; Y Ushio
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Distinguishing between germinomas and pineal cell tumors on MR imaging.

Authors:  N Dumrongpisutikul; J Intrapiromkul; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Pineal region masses: differential diagnosis.

Authors:  J G Smirniotopoulos; E J Rushing; H Mena
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Neuroimaging in pineal tumors.

Authors:  F Reis; A V Faria; V A Zanardi; J R Menezes; F Cendes; L S Queiroz
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  CT of pineal region tumors.

Authors:  S R Ganti; S K Hilal; B M Stein; A J Silver; M Mawad; P Sane
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Role of Gamma Knife surgery in the management of pineal region tumors.

Authors:  Gregory P Lekovic; L Fernando Gonzalez; Andrew G Shetter; Randall W Porter; Kris A Smith; David Brachman; Robert F Spetzler
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 10.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system.

Authors:  David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 17.088

View more
  5 in total

1.  Identification of characteristic features of pineal germinoma that enhance accuracy of preoperative differentiation in pineal region tumors: its significance on optimum surgical treatment.

Authors:  Akihiro Inoue; Takanori Ohnishi; Shohei Kohno; Shiro Ohue; Shinji Iwata; Shirabe Matsumoto; Masahiro Nishikawa; Saya Ozaki; Yosuke Mizuno; Riko Kitazawa; Takeharu Kunieda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  MRI Features of Histologically Diagnosed Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors and Pineoblastomas in Correlation with Molecular Diagnoses and Outcomes: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group ACNS0332 Trial.

Authors:  A Jaju; E I Hwang; M Kool; D Capper; L Chavez; S Brabetz; C Billups; Y Li; M Fouladi; R J Packer; S M Pfister; J M Olson; L A Heier
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diffusion characteristics of pediatric pineal tumors.

Authors:  Asim F Choudhri; Matthew T Whitehead; Adeel Siddiqui; Paul Klimo; Frederick A Boop
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-05-11

4.  MRI features of pediatric intracranial germ cell tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Chih-Chun Wu; Wan-Yuo Guo; Feng-Chi Chang; Chao-Bao Luo; Han-Jui Lee; Yi-Wei Chen; Yi-Yen Lee; Tai-Tong Wong
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation: a systematic review and contemporary management of 389 cases reported during the last two decades.

Authors:  Hajime Takase; Reo Tanoshima; Navneet Singla; Yoshihiko Nakamura; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.042

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.