Literature DB >> 31601574

Dose Reduction While Preserving Diagnostic Quality in Head CT: Advancing the Application of Iterative Reconstruction Using a Live Animal Model.

F D Raslau1,2,3, E J Escott4,5, J Smiley6, C Adams4, D Feigal4, H Ganesh4, C Wang7, J Zhang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Iterative reconstruction has promise in lowering the radiation dose without compromising image quality, but its full potential has not yet been realized. While phantom studies cannot fully approximate the subjective effects on image quality, live animal models afford this assessment. We characterize dose reduction in head CT by applying advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) in a live ovine model while evaluating preservation of gray-white matter detectability and image texture compared with filtered back-projection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A live sheep was scanned on a Force CT scanner (Siemens) at 12 dose levels (82-982 effective mAs). Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection and ADMIRE (strengths, 1-5). A total of 72 combinations (12 doses × 6 reconstructions) were evaluated qualitatively for resemblance to the reference image (highest dose with filtered back-projection) using 2 metrics: detectability of gray-white matter differentiation and noise-versus-smoothness in image texture. Quantitative analysis for noise, SNR, and contrast-to-noise was also performed across all dose-strength combinations.
RESULTS: Both qualitative and quantitative results confirm that gray-white matter differentiation suffers at a lower dose but recovers when complemented by higher iterative reconstruction strength, and image texture acquires excessive smoothness with a higher iterative reconstruction strength but recovers when complemented by dose reduction. Image quality equivalent to the reference image is achieved by a 58% dose reduction with ADMIRE-5.
CONCLUSIONS: An approximately 60% dose reduction may be possible while preserving diagnostic quality with the appropriate dose-strength combination. This in vivo study can serve as a useful guide for translating the full implementation of iterative reconstruction in clinical practice.
© 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31601574      PMCID: PMC6975097          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  32 in total

Review 1.  Basics of iterative reconstruction methods in computed tomography: A vendor-independent overview.

Authors:  Wolfram Stiller
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Iterative Reconstruction Designed for Brain CT: A Correlative Study With Filtered Back Projection for the Diagnosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Yuji Iyama; Takeshi Nakaura; Seitaro Oda; Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Morikatsu Yoshida; Hideaki Yuki; Kenichiro Hirata; Yoshinori Funama; Kazunori Harada; Kazuo Awai; Toshinori Hirai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Cancer risks from CT scans: now we have data, what next?

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Noise-reducing algorithms do not necessarily provide superior dose optimisation for hepatic lesion detection with multidetector CT.

Authors:  K L Dobeli; S J Lewis; S R Meikle; D L Thiele; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Comparing five different iterative reconstruction algorithms for computed tomography in an ROC study.

Authors:  Kristin Jensen; Anne Catrine T Martinsen; Anders Tingberg; Trond Mogens Aaløkken; Erik Fosse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Resistance of the sheep skull after a monocortical cranial graft harvest.

Authors:  Boris Laure; Anaïs Petraud; Florent Sury; François Tranquart; Dominique Goga
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Meghan G Lubner; David H Kim; Jie Tang; Julie A Ruma; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  CT radiation dose and image quality optimization using a porcine model.

Authors:  Francis Zarb; Mark F McEntee; Louise Rainford
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

9.  Effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality in adult head CT with noise-suppressing reconstruction system with a 256 slice MDCT.

Authors:  Ozdil Baskan; Cengiz Erol; Hanefi Ozbek; Yahya Paksoy
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Porcine head response to blast.

Authors:  Jay K Shridharani; Garrett W Wood; Matthew B Panzer; Bruce P Capehart; Michelle K Nyein; Raul A Radovitzky; Cameron R 'dale' Bass
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.