| Literature DB >> 31601036 |
Diana Abril1, Yaneris Mirabal-Gallardo2, Aymeé González3, Adolfo Marican4,5, Esteban F Durán-Lara6,7, Leonardo Silva Santos8, Oscar Valdés9.
Abstract
We investigated the potential of two oil extracts from seeds of Colliguaya integerrima (CIO) and Cynara cardunculus (CO) to use as nutritionally edible oils. For this purpose, oil quality was accessed by determining the fatty acid composition, peroxide value, acid value, iodine value, saponification number, phenolic contents, and oxidative stability during thermally induced oxidation of CIO and CO oils and compared to those of extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO). The chemical composition results demonstrated that both oils could be nutritional sources of essential unsaturated fatty acids. Moreover, according to the gravimetric analysis, the main decomposition step occurred in the temperature range of 200-420 °C, showing a similar thermal behavior of EVOO oil. However, CO and EVOO oils showed a higher phenolic content at degradation onset temperature (T0) in contrast with CIO oil. The antioxidant activity of the different studied oils showed a direct correlation with the phenol contents, up to temperatures around 180 °C, where the percentage of free radical scavenging assay for EVOO was higher than CO in contrast with the TPC values. Finally, we analyzed the minor components before and after heating CIO and CO at 180 °C by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using library search programs.Entities:
Keywords: Colliguaya integerrima oil; Cynara cardunculus oil; antioxidant activity; minor components; thermal behavior
Year: 2019 PMID: 31601036 PMCID: PMC6827052 DOI: 10.3390/antiox8100470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Photograph of plants, obtained oil, and seeds of Colliguaya integerrima (CIO) (a), and Cynara cardunculus (CO) (b).
Chemical composition and fatty acid composition of Colliguaya integerrima (CIO), Cynara cardunculus (CO), and extra-virgin olive (EVOO) oils. The results were expressed as mean values ± SDs (n = 3). Values in the same Same letter (a,b,c) beside standard deviation (SD) in the same row indicate no statistical differences between the oils, using Tukey HSD (at 95% level of confidence).
| Parameters | Oils | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CIO | CO | EVOO | |
| Cox value | 9.35 | 7.57 | 2.38 |
| AV [mg KOH/g oil] | 0.2 ± 0.01a | 0.2 ± 0.02a | 0.4 ± 0.09b |
| IV [g I2/100 g oil] | 124 ± 4.68b | 125 ± 3.89b | 79 ±1.68a |
| PV [meq O2/kg oil] | 19 ± 1.29c | 15 ± 0.21b | 3 ± 0.84a |
| SN [mg KOH/g oil] | 190 ± 5.21a | 196 ± 3.62a | 194 ± 2.01a |
| TPC [mg GAE/kg oil] | 289 ± 13a | 495 ± 19b | 497 ± 19b |
| Fatty acid (%) | |||
| Myristic, C14:0 | 0.06 ± 0.01a | 0.12 ± 0.09a | 0.01 ± 0.01a |
| Palmitic, C16:0 | 10.54 ± 0.35a | 10.42 ± 0.27a | 14.17 ± 0.24b |
| Palmitoleic, C16:1 ϖ-7 | 0.05 ± 0.01a | 0.06 ± 0.01a | 1.94 ± 0.11b |
| Margaric, C17:0 | 0.00 ± 0.009a | 0.05 ± 0.010a | 0.00 ± 0.042a |
| Stearic, C18:0 | 2.03 ± 0.58a | 2.81 ± 0.43a | 4.16 ± 0.18b |
| Oleic, C18:1 ϖ-9 | 23.50 ± 1.20b | 14.90 ± 1.58a | 62.34 ± 1.07c |
| Linoleic, C18:2 ϖ-6 | 31.11 ± 2.10b | 71.11 ± 3.08c | 15.63 ± 1.57a |
| Gamma-linolenic, C18:3 ϖ-6 | 0.48 ± 0.07c | 0.25 ± 0.04b | 0.00 ± 0.02a |
| Alpha-linolenic, C18:3 ϖ-3 | 26.39 ± 0.89b | 0.17 ± 0.09a | 0.58 ± 0.04a |
| Gondoic, C20:1 ϖ-9 | 5.35 ± 1.11b | 0.11 ± 0.08a | 0.00 ± 0.02a |
| Eicosadienoic C20:2 ϖ-6 | 0.48 ± 0.06b | 0.00 ± 0.09a | 0.00 ± 0.01a |
Figure 2Mass Loss-Derivate (TG/DTG) thermograms of Colliguaya integerrima (CIO), Cynara cardunculus (CO), and extra-virgin olive (EVOO) oils.
Figure 3TG curve comparisons for the three different oils showing the selected temperatures corresponding to the degradation of Colliguaya integerrima (CIO), Cynara cardunculus (CO), and extra-virgin olive (EVOO) oils.
Figure 4Total phenolic content of Colliguaya integerrima (CIO), Cynara cardunculus (CO) and extra-virgin olive (EVOO) oils at each studied temperature.
Figure 5Antioxidant capacity of Colliguayaintegerrima (CIO), Cynara cardunculus (CO), and extra-virgin olive (EVOO) oils at each studied temperature.
Figure 6GC–MS chromatogram of CIO and CO after (a,b) and before (c,d) heating process, respectively.