| Literature DB >> 31600941 |
Yi Zhang1, Brian Chi-Yan Cheng2, Wenjuan Zhou3,4, Bing Xu5,6, Xiaoyan Gao7,8,9, Yanjiang Qiao10,11, Gan Luo12,13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High shear wet granulation (HSWG) is a shaping process for granulation that has been enhanced for application in the pharmaceutical industry. However, study of HSWG is complex and challenging due to the relatively poor understanding of HSWG, especially for sticky powder-like herbal extracts. AIM: In this study, we used Salvia miltiorrhiza granules to investigate the HSWG process across different scales using quality by design (QbD) approaches.Entities:
Keywords: Salvia miltiorrhiza granules; high shear wet granulation; quality by design; regime map; scale-up
Year: 2019 PMID: 31600941 PMCID: PMC6835650 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11100519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Granulation factors and response variables for the Plackett–Burman experiment design.
| Factor Abbreviation | Granulation Factors | Level Used | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | ||
| A | Three-dimensional mixing time | 2 min | 20 min |
| B | Dry mixing time | 1 min | 6 min |
| C | Ethanol concentration | 60% | 90% |
| D | 20% | 50% | |
| E | Binder solution amount | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| F | Binder addition time | 30 s | 90 s |
| G | Impeller speed | 300 rpm | 1000 rpm |
| H | Chopper speed | 450 rpm | 2900 rpm |
| I | Drying time | 1 h | 24 h |
Experimental schedule of the uniform design U5 (52).
| Run | Ratio of | Ethanol Amount (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.0 | 10.0 |
| 2 | 42.5 | 8.75 |
| 3 | 45.0 | 7.50 |
| 4 | 47.5 | 6.25 |
| 5 | 50.0 | 5.00 |
Plackett–Burman design matrix and results for screening of various granulation factors. AoR was short for angle of repose, which was an index of granule flowability.
| Run | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | AoR (°) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | 6 | 90 | 20 | 0.05 | 30 | 1000 | 450 | 24 | 103.4 | 31.95 |
| 2 | 20 | 1 | 60 | 20 | 0.1 | 30 | 1000 | 1500 | 1 | 142.7 | 34.99 |
| 3 | 20 | 6 | 60 | 20 | 0.05 | 90 | 300 | 1500 | 24 | 54.00 | 25.07 |
| 4 | 2 | 6 | 60 | 50 | 0.1 | 30 | 1000 | 1500 | 24 | 324.1 | 28.28 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 60 | 50 | 0.05 | 90 | 1000 | 450 | 24 | 323.0 | 34.08 |
| 6 | 20 | 1 | 90 | 50 | 0.1 | 30 | 300 | 450 | 24 | 443.7 | 33.33 |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 60 | 20 | 0.05 | 30 | 300 | 450 | 1 | 84.90 | 24.16 |
| 8 | 20 | 6 | 60 | 50 | 0.1 | 90 | 300 | 450 | 1 | 433.2 | 34.31 |
| 9 | 2 | 6 | 90 | 50 | 0.05 | 30 | 300 | 1500 | 1 | 321.8 | 32.92 |
| 10 | 2 | 6 | 90 | 20 | 0.1 | 90 | 1000 | 450 | 1 | 231.4 | 33.14 |
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 90 | 20 | 0.1 | 90 | 300 | 1500 | 24 | 119.5 | 32.78 |
| 12 | 20 | 1 | 90 | 50 | 0.05 | 90 | 1000 | 1500 | 1 | 229.7 | 34.74 |
ANOVA results for D50 of Plackett–Burman design.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1.96 × 105 | 3 | 64,202.41 | 64.72 | <0.0001 |
| D | 1.496 × 105 | 1 | 1.496 × 105 | 150.76 | <0.0001 |
| E | 27,813.19 | 1 | 27,813.19 | 28.04 | 0.0007 |
| H | 15,238.69 | 1 | 15,238.69 | 15.36 | 0.0044 |
| Residual | 7935.97 | 8 | 992.00 | ||
| Cor Total | 2.005 | 11 | |||
| SD | 31.50 | R-Squared | 0.9604 | ||
| Mean | 234.29 | Adj R-Squared | 0.9456 | ||
| Coefficient of variation (CV)% | 13.44 | Pred R-Squared | 0.9110 | ||
| PRESS | 17,855.94 | Adeq Precision | 21.493 | ||
Box–Behnken experimental design matrix for optimizing granulation factors.
| Run | X1: | X2: Binder Solution Amount | X3: Chopper Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40% | 0.050 | 500 | 153.60 |
| 2 | 50% | 0.100 | 1000 | 362.36 |
| 3 | 40% | 0.100 | 1500 | 243.05 |
| 4 | 40% | 0.075 | 1000 | 191.82 |
| 5 | 50% | 0.075 | 500 | 859.23 |
| 6 | 40% | 0.100 | 500 | 254.16 |
| 7 | 30% | 0.075 | 500 | 159.40 |
| 8 | 50% | 0.050 | 1000 | 260.27 |
| 9 | 40% | 0.075 | 1000 | 191.37 |
| 10 | 40% | 0.050 | 1500 | 152.04 |
| 11 | 50% | 0.075 | 1500 | 359.07 |
| 12 | 40% | 0.075 | 1000 | 168.45 |
| 13 | 30% | 0.075 | 1500 | 161.14 |
| 14 | 40% | 0.075 | 1000 | 208.31 |
| 15 | 30% | 0.100 | 1000 | 182.30 |
| 16 | 30% | 0.050 | 1000 | 108.99 |
| 17 | 40% | 0.075 | 1000 | 188.61 |
ANOVA results for response surface reduced quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 74,828.71 | 6 | 12,471.45 | 75.49933 | <0.0001 * |
| X1 | 34,585.91 | 1 | 34,585.91 | 209.3753 | <0.0001 * |
| X2 | 13,813.87 | 1 | 13,813.87 | 83.62602 | <0.0001 * |
| X3 | 1.472887 | 1 | 1.472887 | 0.008917 | 0.9268 |
| X1 × X2 | 714.2027 | 1 | 714.2027 | 4.323621 | 0.0673 |
| X12 | 20,989.53 | 1 | 20,989.53 | 127.0659 | <0.0001 * |
| X32 | 834.609 | 1 | 834.609 | 5.052533 | 0.0512 |
| Residual | 1486.676 | 9 | 165.1862 | ||
| Lack of fit | 680.3145 | 5 | 136.0629 | 0.67 | 0.663 |
| Pure error | 806.3618 | 4 | 201.5904 | ||
| Cor total | 76,315.38 | 15 | |||
| SD | 12.85248 | R-Squared | 0.980519 | ||
| Mean | 209.0576 | Adj R-Squared | 0.967532 | ||
| CV% | 6.147817 | Pred R-Squared | 0.712246 | ||
| PRESS | 21,960.06 | Adeq Precision | 30.27463 | ||
Asterisks denote most significant factors and interaction effects (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 13D response surface showing the effects of the S. miltiorrhiza granule ratio and binder solution amount on D50.
Figure 2Contour plots showing effects of the S. miltiorrhiza extract powder ratio and binder solution amount on D50.
Figure 3Design space of D50 for high shear wet granulation without confidence interval.
Figure 4Design space of D50 for high shear wet granulation (HSWG) coupled with a 95% confidence interval.
Validation experiment results.
| Run | X1: | X2: Binder Solution Amount | X3: Chopper Speed (rpm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46% | 0.086 | 933 | 305.81 |
| 2 | 44% | 0.100 | 719 | 508.94 |
| 3 | 47% | 0.068 | 1367 | 468.67 |
| 4 | 43% | 0.100 | 1300 | 292.26 |
| 5 | 44% | 0.095 | 1200 | 298.45 |
| 6 | 45% | 0.090 | 1100 | 300.45 |
| 7 | 46% | 0.085 | 1000 | 303.20 |
| 8 | 47% | 0.080 | 1300 | 420.56 |
Figure 5Probability density distributions of five points at three different scales; (a–e) experiment points 1–5 of the uniform design U5 (52). For each figure, different symbols represent 1, 2, and 4 L, respectively.
Cosine values of probability density distribution of granule size at 2- and 4-L process scales compared with that at a 1-L scale.
| Scale (L) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 0.8438 | 0.8753 | 0.9042 | 0.9971 | 0.8546 |
| 4 | 0.8690 | 0.8336 | 0.9799 | 0.9905 | 0.8253 |
Figure 6Scanning electron microscopy images of S. miltiorrhiza granules obtained at the same processing point but at different scales of HSWG. Critical process parameters (CPPs) of point 1 were as follows: three-dimensional mixing for 2 min, dry mixing for 1 min, addition of 90% ethanol for 60 s, impeller speed kept at 500 rpm, chopper speed kept at 1000 rpm, and drying at 60 °C for 2 h. The proportion of S. miltiorrhiza extract was 40%. The proportion of 90% ethanol was 10%. The addition times for 1-, 2-, and 4-L scales were 60, 88, and 140 s, respectively. Labels A, B, and C represent 1-, 2-, and 4-L scales, respectively. “h”, “m”, and “l” in the figure represent high (10,000×), medium (5000×), and low (200×) magnifications, respectively.
Angle of repose of S. miltiorrhiza granules at different scales.
| No. | Average Value (°) | SD (°) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 L-1 | 30.48 | 0.27 | 0.90 |
| 2 L-1 | 30.58 | 0.58 | 1.90 |
| 4 L-1 | 30.39 | 0.28 | 0.93 |
| 1 L-2 | 30.69 | 0.20 | 0.64 |
| 2 L-2 | 30.72 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| 4 L-2 | 30.71 | 0.22 | 0.71 |
| 1 L-3 | 30.45 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| 2 L-3 | 30.65 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| 4 L-3 | 30.37 | 0.18 | 0.58 |
| 1 L-4 | 31.14 | 0.57 | 1.85 |
| 2 L-4 | 31.47 | 0.37 | 1.17 |
| 4 L-4 | 31.17 | 0.72 | 2.32 |
| 1 L-5 | 32.50 | 0.26 | 0.79 |
| 2 L-5 | 32.38 | 0.72 | 2.23 |
| 4 L-5 | 32.73 | 0.60 | 1.82 |
Flow properties and corresponding values of angle of repose.
| Flow Property | Value of Angle of Repose (°) |
|---|---|
| Excellent | 25–30 |
| Good | 31–35 |
| Fair (aid not needed) | 36–40 |
| Passable (may hang up) | 41–45 |
| Poor | 46–55 |
| Very poor | 56–65 |
| Very, very poor | >66 |