Literature DB >> 31598830

Exploring Human Values in the Design of a Web-Based QoL-Instrument for People with Mental Health Problems: A Value Sensitive Design Approach.

Ivo Maathuis1,2, Maartje Niezen3,4, David Buitenweg5,6, Ilja L Bongers5,6, Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen5,6.   

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome measure in mental health care. Currently, QoL is mainly measured with paper and pencil questionnaires. To contribute to the evaluation of treatment, and to enhance substantiated policy decisions in the allocation of resources, a web-based, personalized, patient-friendly and easy to administer QoL instrument has been developed: the QoL-ME. While human values play a significant role in shaping future use practices of technologies, it is important to anticipate on them during the design of the QoL-instrument. The value sensitive design (VSD) approach offers a theory and method for addressing these values in a systematic and principled manner in the design of technologies. While the VSD approach has been applied in the field of somatic care, we extended the VSD approach to the field of mental healthcare with the aim to enable developers of the QoL-instrument to reflect on important human values and anticipate potential value conflicts in its design. We therefore explored how VSD can be used by investigating the human values that are relevant for the design of the QoL-ME. Our exploration reveals that the values autonomy, efficiency, empowerment, universal usability, privacy, redifinition of roles, (redistribution) of responsibilites, reliability, solidarity, surveillance and trust are at stake for the future users of the technology. However, we argue that theoretical reflections on the potential ethical impact of a technology in the design phase can only go so far. To be able to comprehensively evaluate the usability the VSD approach, a supplementary study of the use practices of the technology is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental healthcare; Quality of life; Value sensitive design; mHealth

Year:  2019        PMID: 31598830     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00142-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  18 in total

Review 1.  The surveillant assemblage.

Authors:  K D Haggerty; R V Ericson
Journal:  Br J Sociol       Date:  2000-12

2.  Recovery Is Up to You, a peer-run course.

Authors:  J A W M van Gestel-Timmermans; E P M Brouwers; Ch van Nieuwenhuizen
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Telecare, surveillance, and the welfare state.

Authors:  Tom Sorell; Heather Draper
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Avatar therapy: where technology, symbols, culture, and connection collide.

Authors:  Debra M Quackenbush; Aaron Krasner
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.325

Review 5.  The therapeutic alliance: the key to effective patient outcome? A descriptive review of the evidence in community mental health case management.

Authors:  Irene M Howgego; Peter Yellowlees; Cathy Owen; Lenore Meldrum; Frances Dark
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.744

6.  Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design.

Authors:  Aimee van Wynsberghe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Contested Technologies and Design for Values: The Case of Shale Gas.

Authors:  Marloes Dignum; Aad Correljé; Eefje Cuppen; Udo Pesch; Behnam Taebi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation.

Authors:  Lorraine Catwell; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Applying value sensitive design (VSD) to wind turbines and wind parks: an exploration.

Authors:  Ilse Oosterlaken
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics.

Authors:  Federica Lucivero; Karin R Jongsma
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  1 in total

1.  I Need to Know: Using the CeHRes Roadmap to Develop a Treatment Feedback Tool for Youngsters with Mental Health Problems.

Authors:  Ilja L Bongers; David C Buitenweg; Romy E F M van Kuijk; Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.