| Literature DB >> 31597265 |
Guglielmo Bonaccorsi1, Francesca Pieralli2, Maddalena Innocenti3, Chiara Milani4, Marco Del Riccio5, Martina Donzellini6, Lorenzo Baggiani7, Chiara Lorini8.
Abstract
Many older adults who live at home depend on a caregiver. When familial support cannot provide the necessary care, paid caregivers are frequently hired. Health literacy (HL) is the knowledge and competence required of people to meet the complex demands of health in modern society. The aim of this study is to assess the HL level of paid non-familial caregivers who were enrolled through two different sources: from the homes of assisted people in two Tuscan health districts (first sample) and during job interviews in a home care agency operating in Florence (second sample). The two different recruitment contexts allow us to provide a broader view of the phenomenon, presenting a picture of the HL level of those who are already working and those who are looking for a new job in this field. One-on-one face-to-face interviews, which include the administration of the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) to measure HL, were conducted. Recruitment resulted in 84 caregivers in the first sample and 68 in the second sample. In the first sample, the mean age was 51.2 ± 9 years; 94% of the participants were women. A high likelihood or likelihood of inadequate HL (i.e., a low level of HL) was found in 73.8% of cases. In the second sample, the mean age was 43.7 ± 11.5 years; 83.8% of the participants were women, and 80.9% had a low level of HL. In both samples, HL was statistically associated with the level of understanding of the Italian language. In conclusion, inadequate HL is an under-recognized problem among non-familial caregivers. Educational programs that aim to increase HL skills could be an effective approach to improving the qualification of informal healthcare professionals.Entities:
Keywords: Newest Vital Sign; care dependency; health literacy; non-familial caregiver; older adults
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31597265 PMCID: PMC6801529 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The sample interviewed at home: descriptive analysis (N = 84).
|
|
|
| |
| Gender | Females | 79 | 94.0 |
| Males | 5 | 6.0 | |
| Country of origin | Italy | 2 | 2.4 |
| African countries | 4 | 4.8 | |
| American countries | 9 | 10.7 | |
| Asian countries | 5 | 6 | |
| European countries (other than Italy) | 64 | 76.2 | |
| Educational level | None | 1 | 1.2 |
| Primary school | 5 | 6.0 | |
| Middle school | 20 | 23.8 | |
| High school | 36 | 42.9 | |
| Graduate | 20 | 23.8 | |
| Domicile with the senior | Yes | 73 | 86.9 |
| Level of comprehension of Italian language (for foreigners, N = 82) | Low | 12 | 14.6 |
| Medium | 30 | 36.6 | |
| High | 40 | 48.8 | |
| Health Literacy | High likelihood of limited HL | 33 | 39.3 |
| Possibility of limited HL | 29 | 34.5 | |
| Adequate HL | 22 | 26.2 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) | 51.2 ± 9.7 | 54.0 | 25–66 |
| Years in Italy (for foreigners) | 10.7 ± 5.2 | 10.0 | 2–27 |
| Years of schooling | 11.3 ± 3.7 | 12 | 0–18 |
| Health literacy (NVS score) | 2.6 ± 2.1 | 3.0 | 0–6 |
The sample interviewed at home: health literacy category by the level of comprehension of the Italian language (for foreigners, N = 82). For the health literacy category, χ2 test: p < 0.001. For the NVS score, Kruskal–Wallis test: p < 0.001.
| Level of Comprehension of Italian Language | Health Literacy Category N (%) | Total N (%) | Health literacy (NVS score) Mean (SD); median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High likelihood of limited HL | Possibility of limited HL | High likelihood of adequate HL | |||
|
| 11 (91.7) | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0) | 12 (100) | 0.4 (0.8); 0 |
|
| 13 (43.3) | 12 (40.0) | 5 (16.7) | 30 (100) | 2.2 (1.9); 2.5 |
|
| 8 (20.0) | 15 (37.5) | 17 (42.5) | 40 (100) | 3.6 (1.9); 4 |
|
| 32 (39.0) | 28 (34.1) | 22 (26.8) | 82 (100) | 2.6 (2.1); 3.0 |
The sample recruited during the job interview: descriptive analysis (N = 68).
|
|
|
| |
| Gender | Females | 57 | 83.8 |
| Males | 11 | 16.2 | |
| Country of origin * | Italy | 6 | 8.8 |
| African countries | 6 | 8.8 | |
| American countries | 26 | 38.2 | |
| Asian countries | 4 | 5.9 | |
| European countries (other than Italy) | 25 | 36.8 | |
| Years of experience * | <1 | 13 | 19.1 |
| 1–3 | 19 | 27.9 | |
| 3–7 | 20 | 29.4 | |
| >7 | 12 | 17.6 | |
| Caregiving skills | Personal hygiene | 56 | 82.4 |
| Walking assistance | 56 | 82.4 | |
| First aid/help with medication management | 59 | 86.8 | |
| Kind of seniors assisted in previous jobs | Not self-sufficient | 53 | 77.9 |
| Alzheimer’s disease | 33 | 48.5 | |
| Immobilization | 38 | 55.9 | |
| Dementia | 22 | 32.4 | |
| Depression | 15 | 22,1 | |
| Parkinson’s disease | 14 | 20.6 | |
| Level of comprehension of Italian language (for foreigners, N = 61) * | Low | 6 | 9.8 |
| Medium | 24 | 39.3 | |
| High | 29 | 47.5 | |
| Health literacy category | High likelihood of limited HL | 25 | 36.8 |
| Possibility of limited HL | 30 | 44.1 | |
| Adequate HL | 13 | 19.1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) | 43.7 ± 9.7 | 43.0 | 21–67 |
| Health literacy (NVS score) | 2.3 ± 1.5 | 2.0 | 1–6 |
* Missing data: 1 for “Country of Origin”; 4 for “Years of experience”; 2 for “Level of comprehension of the Italian language”.
The sample recruited during the job interview: health literacy by the level of comprehension of the Italian language (for foreigners, N = 59). For the health literacy category, χ2 test: p = 0.07. For the NVS score, Kruskal–Wallis test: p = 0.005.
| Level of Comprehension of Italian Language | Health Literacy Category N (%) | Total N (%) | Health Literacy (NVS Score) Mean (SD); Median | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Likelihood of Limited HL | Possibility of limited HL | High Likelihood of Adequate HL | |||
|
| 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | 1.3 (0.8); 1 |
|
| 12 (50.0) | 10 (41.7) | 2 (8.3) | 24 (100) | 1.8 (1.5); 1 |
|
| 8 (27.6) | 14 (48.3) | 7 (24.1) | 29 (100) | 2.8 (1.6); 2 |
|
| 25 (42.4) | 25 (42.4) | 9 (42.4) | 59 (100) | 2.3 (1.5); 2.0 |