Literature DB >> 9256857

Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting: applicability of the MDS-HC.

J N Morris1, B E Fries, K Steel, N Ikegami, R Bernabei, G I Carpenter, R Gilgen, J P Hirdes, E Topinková.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of an international trial of the home care version of the MDS assessment and problem identification system (the MDS-HC), including reliability estimates, a comparison of MDS-HC reliabilities with reliabilities of the same items in the MDS 2.0 nursing home assessment instrument, and an examination of the types of problems found in home care clients using the MDS-HC.
DESIGN: Independent, dual assessment of clients of home-care agencies by trained clinicians using a draft of the MDS-HC, with additional descriptive data regarding problem profiles for home care clients. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Reliability data from dual assessments of 241 randomly selected clients of home care agencies in five countries, all of whom volunteered to test the MDS-HC. Also included are an expanded sample of 780 home care assessments from these countries and 187 dually assessed residents from 21 nursing homes in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: The array of MDS-HC assessment items included measures in the following areas: personal items, cognitive patterns, communication/hearing, vision, mood and behavior, social functioning, informal support services, physical functioning, continence, disease diagnoses health conditions and preventive health measures, nutrition/hydration, dental status, skin condition, environmental assessment, service utilization, and medications.
RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of the functional, health status, social environment, and service items in the MDS-HC were taken from the MDS 2.0 for nursing homes. For this item set, it is estimated that the average weighted Kappa is .74 for the MDS-HC and .75 for the MDS 2.0. Similarly, high reliability values were found for items newly introduced in the MDS-HC (weighted Kappa = .70). Descriptive findings also characterize the problems of home care clients, with subanalyses within cognitive performance levels.
CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that the core set of items in the MDS 2.0 work equally well in community and nursing home settings. New items are highly reliable. In tandem, these instruments can be used within the international community, assisting and planning care for older adults within a broad spectrum of service settings, including nursing homes and home care programs. With this community-based, second-generation problem and care plan-driven assessment instrument, disability assessment can be performed consistently across the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9256857     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02975.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  149 in total

Review 1.  Assessing medication appropriateness in the elderly: a review of available measures.

Authors:  P S Shelton; M A Fritsch; M A Scott
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  ACTIVE: a cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults.

Authors:  J B Jobe; D M Smith; K Ball; S L Tennstedt; M Marsiske; S L Willis; G W Rebok; J N Morris; K F Helmers; M D Leveck; K Kleinman
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2001-08

3.  The Resident Assessment Instrument-Mental Health (RAI-MH): inter-rater reliability and convergent validity.

Authors:  John P Hirdes; Trevor F Smith; Terry Rabinowitz; Keita Yamauchi; Edgardo Pérez; Nancy Curtin Telegdi; Peter Prendergast; John N Morris; Naoki Ikegami; Charles D Phillips; Brant E Fries
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  ACTIVE cognitive training and rates of incident dementia.

Authors:  Frederick W Unverzagt; Lin T Guey; Richard N Jones; Michael Marsiske; Jonathan W King; Virginia G Wadley; Michael Crowe; George W Rebok; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 5.  Strengthening research to improve the practice and management of long-term care.

Authors:  Penny Hollander Feldman; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  First-generation versus third-generation comprehensive geriatric assessment instruments in the acute hospital setting: a comparison of the Minimum Geriatric Screening Tools (MGST) and the interRAI Acute Care (interRAI AC).

Authors:  N I H Wellens; M Deschodt; J Flamaing; P Moons; S Boonen; X Boman; C Gosset; J Petermans; K Milisen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Community Discharge of Nursing Home Residents: The Role of Facility Characteristics.

Authors:  Amanda A Holup; Zachary D Gassoumis; Kathleen H Wilber; Kathryn Hyer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Augmenting cognitive training in older adults (The ACT Study): Design and Methods of a Phase III tDCS and cognitive training trial.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Ronald Cohen; Michael Marsiske; Gene E Alexander; Sara J Czaja; Samuel Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Identification of mild cognitive impairment in ACTIVE: algorithmic classification and stability.

Authors:  Sarah E Cook; Michael Marsiske; Kelsey R Thomas; Frederick W Unverzagt; Virginia G Wadley; Jessica B S Langbaum; Michael Crowe
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  Speed of processing training protects self-rated health in older adults: enduring effects observed in the multi-site ACTIVE randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Fredric D Wolinsky; Henry Mahncke; Mark W Vander Weg; Rene Martin; Frederick W Unverzagt; Karlene K Ball; Richard N Jones; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.