Amelia K Adcock1,2, Justin Choi3, Muhammad Alvi2, Ann Murray2, Eric Seachrist2, Matthew Smith2, Scott Findley4. 1. Mayo Clinic, Neurology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 3. School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Abstract
Background: The state of West Virginia (WV) is often seen as a health care desert with a scarcity of hospitals and resources. The prevalence of cerebrovascular disease and associated comorbidities are also some of the highest in the nation. Introduction: Ischemic stroke is a time-sensitive diagnosis. Prompt treatment in WV is difficult due to limited and isolated stroke-ready hospitals. Adoption of telestroke has helped to bypass these obstacles and improve access to care. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analyses; using data from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Stroke Data Registry, and other statewide agencies, we looked for trends in the volume of patients treated with intravenous-tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in WV. We also reviewed data from West Virginia University's (WVU) telestroke database to assess trends in consult volumes and quality metrics. Results: Since the establishment of WVU telestroke, the total number of stroke patients receiving tPA across the state increased by 173% from 2015 (259 patients) to 2018 (448 patients) (p < 0.0001). Telestroke consults made up 24% (107/448) of total statewide tPA administrations for 2018. Between 2016 and 2018, the total symptomatic hemorrhage rate for tPA treated patients through telestroke was 1% (3/292). Telestroke also facilitated local care by avoiding patient transfer on average 65% of the time. Conclusion: Not only has telestroke increased the quantity of treated acute ischemic strokes, but it has also done so safely and effectively even in resource-poor areas. These findings demonstrate that telestroke is a useful tool for treating strokes, particularly those that happen far from stroke centers.
Background: The state of West Virginia (WV) is often seen as a health care desert with a scarcity of hospitals and resources. The prevalence of cerebrovascular disease and associated comorbidities are also some of the highest in the nation. Introduction: Ischemic stroke is a time-sensitive diagnosis. Prompt treatment in WV is difficult due to limited and isolated stroke-ready hospitals. Adoption of telestroke has helped to bypass these obstacles and improve access to care. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analyses; using data from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Stroke Data Registry, and other statewide agencies, we looked for trends in the volume of patients treated with intravenous-tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in WV. We also reviewed data from West Virginia University's (WVU) telestroke database to assess trends in consult volumes and quality metrics. Results: Since the establishment of WVU telestroke, the total number of strokepatients receiving tPA across the state increased by 173% from 2015 (259 patients) to 2018 (448 patients) (p < 0.0001). Telestroke consults made up 24% (107/448) of total statewide tPA administrations for 2018. Between 2016 and 2018, the total symptomatic hemorrhage rate for tPA treated patients through telestroke was 1% (3/292). Telestroke also facilitated local care by avoiding patient transfer on average 65% of the time. Conclusion: Not only has telestroke increased the quantity of treated acute ischemic strokes, but it has also done so safely and effectively even in resource-poor areas. These findings demonstrate that telestroke is a useful tool for treating strokes, particularly those that happen far from stroke centers.
Authors: Devin L Brown; William G Barsan; Lynda D Lisabeth; Michael E Gallery; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Nils Wahlgren; Niaz Ahmed; Antoni Dávalos; Gary A Ford; Martin Grond; Werner Hacke; Michael G Hennerici; Markku Kaste; Sonja Kuelkens; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Risto O Roine; Lauri Soinne; Danilo Toni; Geert Vanhooren Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Karen C Albright; Charles C Branas; Brett C Meyer; Dawn E Matherne-Meyer; Justin A Zivin; Patrick D Lyden; Brendan G Carr Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-10
Authors: William J Meurer; Jennifer J Majersik; Shirley M Frederiksen; Allison M Kade; Annette M Sandretto; Phillip A Scott Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2011-05-06
Authors: Kori S Zachrison; Emily M Hayden; Krislyn M Boggs; Tehnaz P Boyle; Jingya Gao; Margaret E Samuels-Kalow; James P Marcin; Carlos A Camargo Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Amelia K Adcock; Joseph Minardi; Scott Findley; Deb Daniels; Michelle Large; Martha Power Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 1.484