Amelia K Adcock1, Joseph Minardi2, Scott Findley3, Deb Daniels2, Michelle Large2, Martha Power2. 1. Department of Neurology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia. 2. Stroke Center, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Determining whether a patient has a time-critical medical condition requiring helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) transportation is a challenge with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although HEMS is largely accepted as improving outcomes in time-sensitive conditions, overtriage of patients ineligible for acute stroke therapies places patients and providers at unnecessary risk and wastes limited health care resources. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify how accurate our triage system was at identifying high-yield EMS transfers. A better triage system would decrease the volume of low flight value HEMS transfers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study during a 1-year period. Low flight value was defined by acute therapy eligibility and presenting medical status. RESULTS: Of 141 AIS patients transferred by HEMS, 23 (16%) were deemed of low flight value; 14 (61%) were outside the acute treatment time window for either intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or endovascular therapy (EVT); 5 patients (22%) were ineligible for EVT (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale < 6); 2 patients (9%) were ineligible for EVT (Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3); and 2 patients (9%) were flown despite negative angiographic studies performed at transferring institution. Thirteen (57%) of the patients were interfacility transfers as opposed to direct HEMS transport from the field. CONCLUSIONS: HEMS transport for AIS patients plays a crucial role in delivering the best evidence-based care. However, a significant percent of patients did not meet criteria for its optimal utilization, most commonly due to expired treatment windows. Furthermore, low flight value transfers were initiated in spite of physician evaluation > 50% of the time. These results represent a unique opportunity to coordinate education and build effective triage paradigms across a system of stroke care.
BACKGROUND: Determining whether a patient has a time-critical medical condition requiring helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) transportation is a challenge with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Although HEMS is largely accepted as improving outcomes in time-sensitive conditions, overtriage of patients ineligible for acute stroke therapies places patients and providers at unnecessary risk and wastes limited health care resources. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify how accurate our triage system was at identifying high-yield EMS transfers. A better triage system would decrease the volume of low flight value HEMS transfers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study during a 1-year period. Low flight value was defined by acute therapy eligibility and presenting medical status. RESULTS: Of 141 AISpatients transferred by HEMS, 23 (16%) were deemed of low flight value; 14 (61%) were outside the acute treatment time window for either intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or endovascular therapy (EVT); 5 patients (22%) were ineligible for EVT (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale < 6); 2 patients (9%) were ineligible for EVT (Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3); and 2 patients (9%) were flown despite negative angiographic studies performed at transferring institution. Thirteen (57%) of the patients were interfacility transfers as opposed to direct HEMS transport from the field. CONCLUSIONS: HEMS transport for AISpatients plays a crucial role in delivering the best evidence-based care. However, a significant percent of patients did not meet criteria for its optimal utilization, most commonly due to expired treatment windows. Furthermore, low flight value transfers were initiated in spite of physician evaluation > 50% of the time. These results represent a unique opportunity to coordinate education and build effective triage paradigms across a system of stroke care.
Authors: Stephen H Thomas; Farah Cheema; Melissa Cumming; Suzanne K Wedel; David Thomson Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2002 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Brian S Katz; Opeolu Adeoye; Heidi Sucharew; Joseph P Broderick; Jason McMullan; Pooja Khatri; Michael Widener; Kathleen S Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Brett M Kissela; Matthew L Flaherty; Daniel Woo; Simona Ferioli; Jason Mackey; Sharyl Martini; Felipe De Los Rios la Rosa; Dawn O Kleindorfer Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sheila C O Martins; Gustavo Weiss; Andrea G Almeida; Rosane Brondani; Leonardo A Carbonera; Ana Claudia de Souza; Magda Carla O Martins; Guilherme Nasi; Luiz A Nasi; Carlos Batista; Fabrício B Sousa; Márcio A B C Rockenbach; Felipe M Gonçalves; Leonardo M Vedolin; Raul G Nogueira Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Denisse Sequeira; Christian Martin-Gill; Matthew R Kesinger; Laura R Thompson; Tudor G Jovin; Lori M Massaro; Francis X Guyette Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Götz Thomalla; Claus Z Simonsen; Florent Boutitie; Grethe Andersen; Yves Berthezene; Bastian Cheng; Bharath Cheripelli; Tae-Hee Cho; Franz Fazekas; Jens Fiehler; Ian Ford; Ivana Galinovic; Susanne Gellissen; Amir Golsari; Johannes Gregori; Matthias Günther; Jorge Guibernau; Karl Georg Häusler; Michael Hennerici; André Kemmling; Jacob Marstrand; Boris Modrau; Lars Neeb; Natalia Perez de la Ossa; Josep Puig; Peter Ringleb; Pascal Roy; Enno Scheel; Wouter Schonewille; Joaquin Serena; Stefan Sunaert; Kersten Villringer; Anke Wouters; Vincent Thijs; Martin Ebinger; Matthias Endres; Jochen B Fiebach; Robin Lemmens; Keith W Muir; Norbert Nighoghossian; Salvador Pedraza; Christian Gerloff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ole Erik Ulvin; Eivinn Årdal Skjærseth; Helge Haugland; Kjetil Thorsen; Trond Nordseth; Marie Falch Orre; Lars Vesterhus; Andreas Jørstad Krüger Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 2.908