Literature DB >> 31596655

A Snack Formulated with Ingredients to Slow Carbohydrate Digestion and Absorption Reduces the Glycemic Response in Humans: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Candida J Rebello1, William D Johnson1, Yang Pan2, Sandra Larrivee1, Dachuan Zhang1, Mark Nisbet2, Jodee Johnson2, YiFang Chu2, Frank L Greenway1.   

Abstract

This study compared the effect of a snack with ingredients to slow carbohydrate digestion (Test-snack) on postprandial blood glucose and insulin concentrations and subjective appetite ratings. We hypothesized that Test-snack would lower glucose and insulin responses and reduce appetite compared with a Control-snack. Overweight or obese subjects (n = 17) completed a randomized crossover study. Glucose, insulin, and appetite ratings were measured before consuming each snack or white bread (Bread) and over a period of 4 h. Subjects received Test-snack, Control-snack, or Bread in random order at least a week apart. The a priori primary outcome was the glucose response, and the secondary outcomes were appetite ratings and insulin responses. Mixed effects statistical models were used to perform analysis of variance in terms of the area under curve (AUC) and at specific time points. The 2-h AUC for glucose was significantly lower with Test-snack compared to Control-snack and Bread (AUC and 95% confidence intervals: Test = 2186.43 [1783.36-2589.51]; Control = 3293.75 [2893.97-3693.54]; Bread = 2800.28 [2405.79-3194.77] mg/dL · min). Four-hour AUC for glucose, and insulin, followed a similar pattern except that Test-snack did not differ from Bread. The glucose concentrations peaked at 45 min under all three conditions, but Test-snack elicited a lower response than Control-snack and Bread (P < .01). Test increased fullness and satisfaction and reduced hunger and prospective intake compared to Bread (P < .02), but was not significantly different from Control-snack. Ingredients that slow carbohydrate digestion in a snack reduce the postprandial glucose and insulin responses compared to a product without these ingredients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appetite; functional food; glucose; insulin; starch digestion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31596655      PMCID: PMC6985762          DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2019.0097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Food        ISSN: 1096-620X            Impact factor:   2.786


  25 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between Starch, Lipids, and Proteins in Foods: Microstructure Control for Glycemic Response Modulation.

Authors:  Javier Parada; Jose L Santos
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 11.176

2.  Effect of postprandial modulation of glucose availability: short- and long-term analysis.

Authors:  Julie-Anne Nazare; Alexis de Rougemont; Sylvie Normand; Valérie Sauvinet; Monique Sothier; Sophie Vinoy; Michel Désage; Martine Laville
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  Source and amount of carbohydrate affect postprandial glucose and insulin in normal subjects.

Authors:  T M Wolever; C Bolognesi
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Slowly and rapidly digestible starchy foods can elicit a similar glycemic response because of differential tissue glucose uptake in healthy men.

Authors:  Coby Eelderink; Marianne Schepers; Tom Preston; Roel J Vonk; Lizette Oudhuis; Marion G Priebe
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from 3 large US cohorts and an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; Deirdre K Tobias; Vasanti S Malik; An Pan; Adela Hruby; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Postprandial glycaemic, lipaemic and haemostatic responses to ingestion of rapidly and slowly digested starches in healthy young women.

Authors:  Louisa J Ells; Chris J Seal; Bernd Kettlitz; Wendy Bal; John C Mathers
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Effect of glucose, sucrose and fructose on plasma glucose and insulin responses in normal humans: comparison with white bread.

Authors:  B M Lee; T M Wolever
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Inverse association between the effect of carbohydrates on blood glucose and subsequent short-term food intake in young men.

Authors:  G Harvey Anderson; Nicole L A Catherine; Dianne M Woodend; Thomas M S Wolever
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  An Optimized, Slowly Digested Savory Cluster Reduced Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Responses in Healthy Human Subjects.

Authors:  Thomas M S Wolever; Alexandra L Jenkins; Jun Yang; Mark Nisbet; Jodee Johnson; YiFang Chu; Yang Pan
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2019-01-17

10.  Cereal processing influences postprandial glucose metabolism as well as the GI effect.

Authors:  Sophie Vinoy; Sylvie Normand; Alexandra Meynier; Monique Sothier; Corinne Louche-Pelissier; Jocelyne Peyrat; Christine Maitrepierre; Julie-Anne Nazare; Jeannie Brand-Miller; Martine Laville
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Decreasing the RAG:SAG ratio of granola cereal predictably reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses: a report of four randomised trials in healthy adults.

Authors:  Thomas M S Wolever; Alexandra L Jenkins; Janice E Campbell; Adish Ezatagha; Simarata Dhillon; Jodee Johnson; John Schuette; Yumin Chen; YiFang Chu
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2022-03-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.