Literature DB >> 30882061

An Optimized, Slowly Digested Savory Cluster Reduced Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Responses in Healthy Human Subjects.

Thomas M S Wolever1, Alexandra L Jenkins1, Jun Yang2, Mark Nisbet3, Jodee Johnson4, YiFang Chu4, Yang Pan5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Slowly digested carbohydrates are perceived as beneficial by some consumers, and various regulatory bodies have published specific criteria defining lower postprandial glycemic response. We developed an optimized savory cluster snack containing slowly digested starch.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the glucose and insulin responses elicited by the optimized (test-) cluster, a control-cluster, and an available-carbohydrate-matched portion of white bread in healthy individuals. The primary outcome was blood-glucose peak rise.We tested healthy individuals (n = 25) on 3 occasions using a randomized crossover design. On each occasion, the participants provided fasting blood samples and then consumed 1 serving of test-cluster, control-cluster, or white bread. We then measured the participants' blood-glucose and serum-insulin concentrations over the next 4 h.
RESULTS: The test-cluster elicited a significantly lower blood-glucose peak rise (mean ± SEM: 1.24 ± 0.09 mmol/L) and incremental area under the curve (iAUC; 67 ± 8 mmol × min/L) than the control-cluster (2.27 ± 0.13 mmol/L and 117 ± 10 mmol × min/L, respectively) and white bread (2.27 ± 0.16 mmol/L and 114 ± 9 mmol × min/L, respectively). The serum-insulin peak rise and iAUC elicited by the test-cluster (128 ± 13 pmol/L and 6.10 ± 0.73 nmol × min/L, respectively) and white bread (141 ± 20 pmol/L and 6.47 ± 1.11 nmol × min/L, respectively) were significantly lower than those elicited by the control-cluster (205 ± 26 pmol/L and 9.60 ± 1.31 nmol × min/L, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The test-cluster elicited lower glucose and insulin responses than the control-cluster. The results support the hypothesis that the carbohydrates in the test-cluster are digested and absorbed slowly in vivo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; glycemic response; humans; insulinemic response; snacks; starch

Year:  2019        PMID: 30882061      PMCID: PMC6411418          DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzz006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr        ISSN: 2475-2991


  24 in total

1.  Effect of blood sampling schedule and method of calculating the area under the curve on validity and precision of glycaemic index values.

Authors:  Thomas M S Wolever
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Effect of postprandial modulation of glucose availability: short- and long-term analysis.

Authors:  Julie-Anne Nazare; Alexis de Rougemont; Sylvie Normand; Valérie Sauvinet; Monique Sothier; Sophie Vinoy; Michel Désage; Martine Laville
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  The effects of low- and high-glycemic index meals on time trial performance.

Authors:  Laura J S Moore; Adrian W Midgley; Gemma Thomas; Shane Thurlow; Lars R McNaughton
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.010

4.  The delivery rate of dietary carbohydrates affects cognitive performance in both rats and humans.

Authors:  David Benton; Marie-Pierre Ruffin; Taous Lassel; Samantha Nabb; Michaël Messaoudi; Sophie Vinoy; Didier Desor; Vincent Lang
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Influence of high-carbohydrate mixed meals with different glycemic indexes on substrate utilization during subsequent exercise in women.

Authors:  Emma J Stevenson; Clyde Williams; Laura E Mash; Beth Phillips; Maria L Nute
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose.

Authors:  Klaus N Englyst; Sophie Vinoy; Hans N Englyst; Vincent Lang
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Modulation of the postprandial phase by beta-glucan in overweight subjects: effects on glucose and insulin kinetics.

Authors:  Julie-Anne Nazare; Sylvie Normand; Angeliki Oste Triantafyllou; Aude Brac de la Perrière; Michel Desage; Martine Laville
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.914

8.  Diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index for weight-loss maintenance.

Authors:  Thomas Meinert Larsen; Stine-Mathilde Dalskov; Marleen van Baak; Susan A Jebb; Angeliki Papadaki; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; J Alfredo Martinez; Teodora Handjieva-Darlenska; Marie Kunešová; Mats Pihlsgård; Steen Stender; Claus Holst; Wim H M Saris; Arne Astrup
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Rapidly available glucose in foods: an in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response.

Authors:  K N Englyst; H N Englyst; G J Hudson; T J Cole; J H Cummings
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008.

Authors:  Fiona S Atkinson; Kaye Foster-Powell; Jennie C Brand-Miller
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 17.152

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Snack Formulated with Ingredients to Slow Carbohydrate Digestion and Absorption Reduces the Glycemic Response in Humans: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Candida J Rebello; William D Johnson; Yang Pan; Sandra Larrivee; Dachuan Zhang; Mark Nisbet; Jodee Johnson; YiFang Chu; Frank L Greenway
Journal:  J Med Food       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.786

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.