Literature DB >> 31596645

Degree of Hearing Loss Affects Bilateral Hearing Aid Benefits in Ecologically Relevant Laboratory Conditions.

Todd A Ricketts1, Erin M Picou1, James Shehorn2, Andrew B Dittberner3.   

Abstract

Purpose Previous evidence supports benefits of bilateral hearing aids, relative to unilateral hearing aid use, in laboratory environments using audio-only (AO) stimuli and relatively simple tasks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bilateral hearing aid benefits in ecologically relevant laboratory settings, with and without visual cues. In addition, we evaluated the relationship between bilateral benefit and clinically viable predictive variables. Method Participants included 32 adult listeners with hearing loss ranging from mild-moderate to severe-profound. Test conditions varied by hearing aid fitting type (unilateral, bilateral) and modality (AO, audiovisual). We tested participants in complex environments that evaluated the following domains: sentence recognition, word recognition, behavioral listening effort, gross localization, and subjective ratings of spatialization. Signal-to-noise ratio was adjusted to provide similar unilateral speech recognition performance in both modalities and across procedures. Results Significant and similar bilateral benefits were measured for both modalities on all tasks except listening effort, where bilateral benefits were not identified in either modality. Predictive variables were related to bilateral benefits in some conditions. With audiovisual stimuli, increasing hearing loss, unaided speech recognition in noise, and unaided subjective spatial ability were significantly correlated with increased benefits for many outcomes. With AO stimuli, these same predictive variables were not significantly correlated with outcomes. No predictive variables were correlated with bilateral benefits for sentence recognition in either modality. Conclusions Hearing aid users can expect significant bilateral hearing aid advantages for ecologically relevant, complex laboratory tests. Although future confirmatory work is necessary, these data indicate the presence of vision strengthens the relationship between bilateral benefits and degree of hearing loss.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31596645     DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-19-0013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  8 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 2.  Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Richard A Roberts; Gina Angley; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  The Effect of Hearing Loss on Localization of Amplitude-Panned and Physical Sources.

Authors:  Gregory M Ellis; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  The Type of Noise Influences Quality Ratings for Noisy Speech in Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Emily M H Lundberg; Song Hui Chon; James M Kates; Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Sara Magits; Tom Francart; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Marina M Tawdrous; Kristen L D'Onofrio; René Gifford; Erin M Picou
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

7.  Rehabilitation of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss in Adults in Sweden.

Authors:  Christian Löfvenberg; Satu Turunen-Taheri; Per-Inge Carlsson; Åsa Skagerstrand
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-08-20

8.  fNIRS Assessment of Speech Comprehension in Children with Normal Hearing and Children with Hearing Aids in Virtual Acoustic Environments: Pilot Data and Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Laura Bell; Z Ellen Peng; Florian Pausch; Vanessa Reindl; Christiane Neuschaefer-Rube; Janina Fels; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.