Literature DB >> 3159650

Inhibition of the anti-receptor antibody response of contact sensitivity by interferon.

W Freitag, J Knop.   

Abstract

Mice sensitized with optimal doses of 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) develop maximum delayed hypersensitivity in 4-5 days; the intensity of this reaction declines rapidly 14 days after sensitization. In the serum of mice 14 days after sensitization, an anti-receptor antibody has been described. It has been suggested that this antibody might be responsible for this rapid decline of contact sensitivity. We studied the effect of interferon alpha, beta (IFN alpha, beta) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) in this model. IFN alpha, beta (2 X 10(4) units/ mouse) or Cy (200 mg/kg) injected at Days 0 and 1 during sensitization, or at Day -2 before sensitization, respectively, partially prevented the decline of contact sensitivity as compared to the controls. In the serum of mice treated with IFN or Cy, no anti-receptor antibody could be detected 14 days after sensitization. These results suggest that anti-receptor antibody may be partially responsible for the waning of contact sensitivity. It is further suggested that IFN inhibited the anti-receptor antibody response by preventing the generation of the anti-receptor-antibody-inducing auxiliar T-suppressor cell. It is concluded that IFN alpha, beta enhances the delayed hypersensitivity response in contact allergy by inhibition of the T-suppressor circuit, as previously reported, and by suppression of the anti-receptor antibody response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3159650      PMCID: PMC1453619     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  12 in total

1.  Regulation of cell mediated immunity by antibodies: possible role of anti-receptor antibodies in the regulation of contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice.

Authors:  M S Sy; J W Moorhead; H N Claman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  A splenic requirement for the generation of suppressor T cells.

Authors:  M S Sy; S D Miller; H B Kowach; H N Claman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 3.  Suppressor cells and the handling of antigen.

Authors:  G L Asherson; M Zembala; W R Thomas; M A Perera
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 4.  Suppressive mechanisms involving sensitization and tolerance in contact allergy.

Authors:  H N Claman; S D Miller; M S Sy; J W Moorhead
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Requirements for induction of T cell tolerance to DNFB: efficiency of membrane-associated DNFB.

Authors:  H N Claman; S D Miller
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Purification of mouse interferon by sequential affinity chromatography on poly(U)--and antibody--agarose columns.

Authors:  J De Maeyer-Guignard; M G Tovey; I Gresser; E De Maeyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Effect of virus-induced interferon on the antibody response of suckling and adult mice.

Authors:  F Vignaux; I Gresser; W H Fridman
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Modulation of suppressor mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis: 1. Effect of C. parvum on the induction phase of contact allergy.

Authors:  J Knop; R Riechmann; E Macher
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Antigen receptors on murine T lymphocytes in contact sensitivity. III. Mechanism of negative feedback regulation by auto-anti-idiotypic antibody.

Authors:  J W Moorhead
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1982-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Active suppression of 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene-immune T cells. Requirement of an auxiliary T cell induced by antigen.

Authors:  M S Sy; S D Miller; J W Moorhead; H N Claman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1979-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.