Maria-Alexandra Papadimitriou1, Margaritis Avgeris1, Panagiotis K Levis2, Theodoros Tokas2, Konstantinos Stravodimos2, Andreas Scorilas3. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodostrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 157 01, Athens, Greece. 2. First Department of Urology, "Laiko" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodostrian University of Athens, Agiou Thoma 17, 11527, Athens, Greece. 3. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodostrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 157 01, Athens, Greece. ascorilas@biol.uoa.gr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bladder cancer represents a major cause of malignancy-related morbidity and the most expensive per-patient-to-treat cancer, due to the lifelong surveillance of the patients. Accurate disease prognosis is essential in establishing personalized treatment decisions; yet optimum tools for precise risk stratification remain a competing task. In the present study, we have performed the complete evaluation of TP63 clinical significance in improving disease prognosis. METHODS: The levels of ΔNp63 and TAp63 transcripts of TP63 were quantified in 342 bladder tissue specimens of our screening cohort (n = 182). Hedegaard et al. (Cancer Cell 30:27-42. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.05.004, 2016) (n = 476) and TCGA provisional (n = 413) were used as validation cohorts for NMIBC and MIBC, respectively. Survival analysis was performed using recurrence and progression for NMIBC or mortality for MIBC as endpoint events. Bootstrap analysis was performed for internal validation, while decision curve analysis was used for the evaluation of the clinical net benefit on disease prognosis. RESULTS: ΔNp63 was significantly expressed in bladder tissues, and was found to be over-expressed in bladder tumors. Interestingly, reduced ΔNp63 levels were correlated with muscle-invasive disease, high-grade tumors and high-EORTC-risk NMIBC patients. Moreover, ΔNp63 loss was independently associated with higher risk for NMIBC relapse (HR = 2.730; p = 0.007) and progression (HR = 7.757; p = 0.016). Hedegaard et al. and TCGA validation cohorts confirmed our findings. Finally, multivariate models combining ΔΝp63 loss with established prognostic markers led to a superior clinical benefit for NMIBC prognosis and risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: ΔΝp63 loss is associated with adverse outcome of NMIBC resulting in superior prediction of NMIBC early relapse and progression.
PURPOSE:Bladder cancer represents a major cause of malignancy-related morbidity and the most expensive per-patient-to-treat cancer, due to the lifelong surveillance of the patients. Accurate disease prognosis is essential in establishing personalized treatment decisions; yet optimum tools for precise risk stratification remain a competing task. In the present study, we have performed the complete evaluation of TP63 clinical significance in improving disease prognosis. METHODS: The levels of ΔNp63 and TAp63 transcripts of TP63 were quantified in 342 bladder tissue specimens of our screening cohort (n = 182). Hedegaard et al. (Cancer Cell 30:27-42. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.05.004, 2016) (n = 476) and TCGA provisional (n = 413) were used as validation cohorts for NMIBC and MIBC, respectively. Survival analysis was performed using recurrence and progression for NMIBC or mortality for MIBC as endpoint events. Bootstrap analysis was performed for internal validation, while decision curve analysis was used for the evaluation of the clinical net benefit on disease prognosis. RESULTS: ΔNp63 was significantly expressed in bladder tissues, and was found to be over-expressed in bladder tumors. Interestingly, reduced ΔNp63 levels were correlated with muscle-invasive disease, high-grade tumors and high-EORTC-risk NMIBC patients. Moreover, ΔNp63 loss was independently associated with higher risk for NMIBC relapse (HR = 2.730; p = 0.007) and progression (HR = 7.757; p = 0.016). Hedegaard et al. and TCGA validation cohorts confirmed our findings. Finally, multivariate models combining ΔΝp63 loss with established prognostic markers led to a superior clinical benefit for NMIBC prognosis and risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: ΔΝp63 loss is associated with adverse outcome of NMIBC resulting in superior prediction of NMIBC early relapse and progression.
Authors: Robert S Svatek; Brent K Hollenbeck; Sten Holmäng; Richard Lee; Simon P Kim; Arnulf Stenzl; Yair Lotan Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Otakar Capoun; Daniel Cohen; Eva M Compérat; Virginia Hernández; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Morgan Rouprêt; Bas W G van Rhijn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Viktor Soukup; Richard J Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jakob Hedegaard; Philippe Lamy; Iver Nordentoft; Ferran Algaba; Søren Høyer; Benedicte Parm Ulhøi; Søren Vang; Thomas Reinert; Gregers G Hermann; Karin Mogensen; Mathilde Borg Houlberg Thomsen; Morten Muhlig Nielsen; Mirari Marquez; Ulrika Segersten; Mattias Aine; Mattias Höglund; Karin Birkenkamp-Demtröder; Niels Fristrup; Michael Borre; Arndt Hartmann; Robert Stöhr; Sven Wach; Bastian Keck; Anna Katharina Seitz; Roman Nawroth; Tobias Maurer; Cane Tulic; Tatjana Simic; Kerstin Junker; Marcus Horstmann; Niels Harving; Astrid Christine Petersen; M Luz Calle; Ewout W Steyerberg; Willemien Beukers; Kim E M van Kessel; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen; Jakob Skou Pedersen; Per-Uno Malmström; Núria Malats; Francisco X Real; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Torben Falck Ørntoft; Lars Dyrskjøt Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Mai N Tran; Woonyoung Choi; Matthew F Wszolek; Neema Navai; I-Ling C Lee; Giovanni Nitti; Sijin Wen; Elsa R Flores; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Bogdan Czerniak; Colin Dinney; Michelle Barton; David J McConkey Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Ashish M Kamat; Noah M Hahn; Jason A Efstathiou; Seth P Lerner; Per-Uno Malmström; Woonyoung Choi; Charles C Guo; Yair Lotan; Wassim Kassouf Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael A Moses; Andrea L George; Nozomi Sakakibara; Kanwal Mahmood; Roshini M Ponnamperuma; Kathryn E King; Wendy C Weinberg Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Francesca Sanguedolce; Magda Zanelli; Andrea Palicelli; Stefano Ascani; Maurizio Zizzo; Giorgia Cocco; Lars Björnebo; Anna Lantz; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Tim Muilwijk; Murat Akand; Frank Van der Aa; Vincent De Coninck; Marc Claessens; Robert Hente; Markus Eckstein; Yves Allory; Louis Libbrecht; Steven Joniau; Thomas Gevaert Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 5.310