Literature DB >> 31595288

Annotations capturing cell type-specific TF binding explain a large fraction of disease heritability.

Bryce van de Geijn1, Hilary Finucane2, Steven Gazal1, Farhad Hormozdiari1, Tiffany Amariuta3,4,5,6, Xuanyao Liu1, Alexander Gusev7, Po-Ru Loh8, Yakir Reshef9,10,11, Gleb Kichaev12, Soumya Raychauduri1,3,4,5,6, Alkes L Price1,2,11.   

Abstract

Regulatory variation plays a major role in complex disease and that cell type-specific binding of transcription factors (TF) is critical to gene regulation. However, assessing the contribution of genetic variation in TF-binding sites to disease heritability is challenging, as binding is often cell type-specific and annotations from directly measured TF binding are not currently available for most cell type-TF pairs. We investigate approaches to annotate TF binding, including directly measured chromatin data and sequence-based predictions. We find that TF-binding annotations constructed by intersecting sequence-based TF-binding predictions with cell type-specific chromatin data explain a large fraction of heritability across a broad set of diseases and corresponding cell types; this strategy of constructing annotations addresses both the limitation that identical sequences may be bound or unbound depending on surrounding chromatin context and the limitation that sequence-based predictions are generally not cell type-specific. We partitioned the heritability of 49 diseases and complex traits using stratified linkage disequilibrium (LD) score regression with the baseline-LD model (which is not cell type-specific) plus the new annotations. We determined that 100 bp windows around MotifMap sequenced-based TF-binding predictions intersected with a union of six cell type-specific chromatin marks (imputed using ChromImpute) performed best, with an 58% increase in heritability enrichment compared to the chromatin marks alone (11.6× vs. 7.3×, P = 9 × 10-14 for difference) and a 20% increase in cell type-specific signal conditional on annotations from the baseline-LD model (P = 8 × 10-11 for difference). Our results show that TF-binding annotations explain substantial disease heritability and can help refine genome-wide association signals.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31595288      PMCID: PMC7206853          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddz226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  54 in total

1.  JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles.

Authors:  Albin Sandelin; Wynand Alkema; Pär Engström; Wyeth W Wasserman; Boris Lenhard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning.

Authors:  Babak Alipanahi; Andrew Delong; Matthew T Weirauch; Brendan J Frey
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Systematic functional regulatory assessment of disease-associated variants.

Authors:  Konrad J Karczewski; Joel T Dudley; Kimberly R Kukurba; Rong Chen; Atul J Butte; Stephen B Montgomery; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Epigenomics: Roadmap for regulation.

Authors:  Casey E Romanoski; Christopher K Glass; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Laurence Wilson; Genevieve Almouzni
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Leveraging Polygenic Functional Enrichment to Improve GWAS Power.

Authors:  Gleb Kichaev; Gaurav Bhatia; Po-Ru Loh; Steven Gazal; Kathryn Burch; Malika K Freund; Armin Schoech; Bogdan Pasaniuc; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Incorporating Functional Annotations for Fine-Mapping Causal Variants in a Bayesian Framework Using Summary Statistics.

Authors:  Wenan Chen; Shannon K McDonnell; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lori S Tillmans; Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  An evolutionary framework for measuring epigenomic information and estimating cell-type-specific fitness consequences.

Authors:  Brad Gulko; Adam Siepel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Context influences on TALE-DNA binding revealed by quantitative profiling.

Authors:  Julia M Rogers; Luis A Barrera; Deepak Reyon; Jeffry D Sander; Manolis Kellis; J Keith Joung; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Identification of breast cancer associated variants that modulate transcription factor binding.

Authors:  Yunxian Liu; Ninad M Walavalkar; Mikhail G Dozmorov; Stephen S Rich; Mete Civelek; Michael J Guertin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Identification of genetic variants that affect histone modifications in human cells.

Authors:  Graham McVicker; Bryce van de Geijn; Jacob F Degner; Carolyn E Cain; Nicholas E Banovich; Anil Raj; Noah Lewellen; Marsha Myrthil; Yoav Gilad; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Identifying disease-critical cell types and cellular processes by integrating single-cell RNA-sequencing and human genetics.

Authors:  Karthik A Jagadeesh; Kushal K Dey; Daniel T Montoro; Rahul Mohan; Steven Gazal; Jesse M Engreitz; Ramnik J Xavier; Alkes L Price; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 41.307

2.  Evaluating the informativeness of deep learning annotations for human complex diseases.

Authors:  Kushal K Dey; Bryce van de Geijn; Samuel Sungil Kim; Farhad Hormozdiari; David R Kelley; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Predicting genotype-specific gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Deborah Weighill; Marouen Ben Guebila; Kimberly Glass; John Quackenbush; John Platig
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  SNP-to-gene linking strategies reveal contributions of enhancer-related and candidate master-regulator genes to autoimmune disease.

Authors:  Kushal K Dey; Steven Gazal; Bryce van de Geijn; Samuel Sungil Kim; Joseph Nasser; Jesse M Engreitz; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Cell Genom       Date:  2022-07-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.