| Literature DB >> 31594541 |
Landre Djamouko-Djonkam1,2, Souleman Mounchili-Ndam1,3, Nelly Kala-Chouakeu1,2, Stella Mariette Nana-Ndjangwo1,3, Edmond Kopya1,3, Nadége Sonhafouo-Chiana1,4, Abdou Talipouo1,3, Carmene Sandra Ngadjeu1,3, Patricia Doumbe-Belisse1,3, Roland Bamou1,2, Jean Claude Toto1, Timoléon Tchuinkam2, Charles Sinclair Wondji5, Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rapid and unplanned urbanization of African cities is considered to increase the risk of urban malaria transmission. The present study objective was to assess factors influencing the spatio-temporal distribution of Anopheles gambiae s.l. larvae in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles dynamics; Cameroon; GIS; Larval habitat; Malaria; Urban environment; Yaoundé
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31594541 PMCID: PMC6784347 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-019-0597-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Fig. 1A digital elevation model (DEM) image of the city of Yaoundé showing elevation of study sites
Characteristics of the different types of breeding habitats recorded in the city of Yaoundé
| Types of sites | Number of sites (%) | % with anopheline larvae | % with size < 1 m | % > 25 vegetation coverage | % with algae | % with culicine larvae |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puddles | 273 (51.6) | 50.5 | 44.3 | 17.2 | 17.9 | 22 |
| Tire prints | 68 (12.9) | 67.6 | 58.8 | 2.9 | 7.3 | 22.1 |
| Foot prints | 11 (2.1) | 91 | 81 | 10 | 0 | 41 |
| Wells | 62 (11.7) | 17.7 | 51.6 | 11.3 | 30.6 | 11.3 |
| Drains | 60 (11.3) | 25 | 41.7 | 36.7 | 45 | 21.7 |
| Furrows | 44 (8.3) | 29.5 | 15.9 | 36.4 | 18.2 | 29.5 |
| Artificial containersa | 4 (0.8) | 25 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| Othersb | 7 (1.3) | 14.3 | 0 | 28.6 | 14.3 | 42.9 |
aTyres and buckets; bPonds, pits and Rivers edges
Characterization of anopheline larvae breeding sites
| Characteristics | Variables | Number of BS sampled | Number of BS with anopheline larvae (%) | Odd ratio (95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximity to living habitats (meter) | ≤ 10 | 283 | 108 (38.2) | 1 | 0.002 |
| > 10 | 247 | 127 (51.4) | 1.7 (1.2–2.4) | ||
| Size (m2) | ≤ 1 | 228 | 138 (60.5) | 1 | < 0.0001 |
| > 1 | 302 | 97 (32.1) | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | ||
| Depth (meters) | < 1 | 465 | 223 (48.0) | 1 | < 0.0001 |
| ≥ 1 | 65 | 12 (18.5) | 0.25 (0.1–0.5) | ||
| Permanency | Temporal | 397 | 207 (52.1) | 1 | < 0.0001 |
| Semi-permanent | 64 | 16 (25.0) | 0.3 (0.2–0.5) | ||
| Permanent | 69 | 12 (17.4) | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | < 0.0001 | |
| Vegetation cover (%) | 0–25 | 439 | 213 (48.5) | 1 | < 0.0001 |
| 25–75 | 65 | 13 (20.0) | 0.3 (0.1–0.5) | ||
| 75–100 | 26 | 6 (23.1) | 0.3 (0.1–0.8) | 0.016 | |
| Algae | Present | 110 | 40 (36.4) | 1 | 0.06 |
| Absent | 420 | 195 (46.4) | 1.5 (1.0–2.3) | ||
| Culicine larvae | Present | 115 | 38 (33.0) | 1 | 0.3 |
| Absent | 414 | 158 (38.2) | 1.3 (0.8–1.9) | ||
| Predators | Present | 99 | 22 (22.2) | 1 | < 0.0001 |
| Absent | 431 | 213 (49.4) | 3.4 (0.2–5.7) |
BS Breeding site
Comparison of physico–chemical characteristics between sites with and without anopheline larvae
| Parameter | With anopheline larvae | Without anopheline larvae | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Means ± SE |
| Means ± SE | |||
| pH | 227 | 8.0 ± 0.1 | 286 | 7.8 ± 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| TDS (mg/L) | 240 | 96.2 ± 16.8 | 300 | 93.9 ± 9.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Conductivity (μs/cm) | 240 | 449.0 ± 29.8 | 300 | 382.9 ± 14.6 | 3.9 | 0.05 |
| Turbidity (FTU) | 240 | 380.9 ± 103.8 | 300 | 146.0 ± 18.7 | 10.5 | 0.001 |
| Calcium (mg/L) | 240 | 53.7 ± 21.7 | 300 | 129.7 ± 85.6 | 2 | 0.16 |
| Iron LR | 108 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 118 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0 | 0.98 |
| Organophosphates (mg/L) | 138 | 13.3 ± 4.2 | 158 | 9.0 ± 0.8 | 3.5 | 0.06 |
| Aluminium (mg/L) | 240 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 300 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| Sulfate | 240 | 42.2 ± 3.9 | 300 | 36.8 ± 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| H2O2 (mg/L) | 240 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 300 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 27.4 | 0.002 |
| Temperature (°C) | 240 | 28.2 ± 0.2 | 300 | 27.4 ± 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.001 |
N Number, SE Standard error, FTU Formazine turbidity unit, TDS Total disolved solids, LR Light rigid
Fig. 2Spatial and temporal distribution of temporary breeding habitats in the city of Yaoundé
Fig. 3Spatial and temporal distribution of breeding sites with anopheline larvae in the city of Yaoundé
Fig. 4Evolution of the land cover in Yaoundé between 2017 and 2018 and the density of anopheline larvae in breeding sites
Fig. 5Evolution of Building Index (BI), Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in 2017 in Yaoundé
Fig. 6Evolution of Building Index (BI), Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in 2018 in Yaoundé
Fig. 7Spatial distribution of Anopheles gambiae and An. coluzzii larvae in breeding sites of some districts of Yaoundé
Fig. 8Multiple component analysis showing relationship between An. gambiae s.s., An. coluzzi presence and some physical characteristics of breeding sites in Yaoundé