| Literature DB >> 31592427 |
Xin Li1, Shiyi Lu1, Zuogang Xiong2, Yong Hu1, Dan Ma1, Wenqi Lou2, Chen Peng2,3, Mingwu Shen1, Xiangyang Shi1.
Abstract
Design of novel nanoplatforms with single imaging elements for dynamic and enhanced T 1/T 2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of diseases still remains significantly challenging. Here, a facile strategy to synthesize light-addressable ultrasmall Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) that can form nanoclusters (NCs) under laser irradiation for enhanced and dynamic T 1/T 2-weighted MR imaging of inflammatory arthritis is reported. Citric acid-stabilized ultrasmall Fe3O4 NPs synthesized via a solvothermal approach are linked with both the arthritis targeting ligand folic acid (FA) and light-addressable unit diazirine (DA) via polyethylene glycol (PEG) spacer. The formed ultrasmall Fe3O4-PEG-(DA)-FA NPs are cytocompatible, display FA-mediated targeting specificity to arthritis-associated macrophage cells, and can form NCs upon laser irradiation to have tunable r 1 and r 2 relaxivities by varying the laser irradiation duration. With these properties owned, the designed Fe3O4-PEG-(DA)-FA NPs can be used for T 1-weighted MR imaging of arthritis without lasers and enhanced dual-mode T 1/T 2-weighted MR imaging of arthritis under laser irradiation due to the formation of NCs that have extended accumulation within the arthritis region and limited intravasation back to the blood circulation. The designed light-addressable Fe3O4-PEG-(DA)-FA NPs may be used as a promising platform for dynamic and precision T 1/T 2-weighted MR imaging of other diseases.Entities:
Keywords: T1/T2‐weighted MR imaging; folic acid‐mediated targeting; inflammatory arthritis; light‐addressable nanoclusters; ultrasmall Fe3O4 NPs
Year: 2019 PMID: 31592427 PMCID: PMC6774037 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201901800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Fe3O4‐PEG‐(DA)‐FA NPs for enhanced retention and tunable T 1/T 2‐weighted MR imaging of inflammatory arthritis.
Figure 2a) TEM images, b) energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy, and c) hydrodynamic size of Fe3O4‐PEG‐(DA)‐FA NPs under 405 nm laser irradiation (1.0 W cm−2) for different periods of time.
Figure 3a) T 1 relaxation rates, b) T 2 relaxation rates, and c) T 1‐weighted MR imaging, d) T 2‐weighted MR imaging as a function of Fe concentration for the Fe3O4‐PEG‐(DA)‐FA NPs and Fe3O4‐PEG‐(DA)‐FA NCs under 405 nm laser irradiation (1.0 W cm−2) for different periods of time.
Figure 4a,b) In vivo T 1‐weighted MR imaging of regular arthritis and free FA‐blocked arthritis model. Dashed line of ellipse represents the arthritis region. c) Corresponding MR SNR of the arthritis region before and at different time points post intravenous injection of the Fe3O4‐PEG‐(DA)‐FA NPs. d) The MR SNR ratios between arthritis and free FA‐blocked arthritis model before and at different time points post intravenous injection of the Fe3O4‐PEG‐(DA)‐FA NPs.
Figure 5In vivo a) T 1‐weighted, b) T 2‐weighted MR imaging, and c,d) the corresponding MR SNR of arthritis model before (control) and after intravenous injection of Fe3O4‐PEG‐(DA)‐FA NPs (before and after laser irradiation). The white and red arrows indicate the arthritis region without and with laser irradiation, respectively. e,f) Safranin O and Prussian blue‐stained tissue section of inflammatory arthritis after different treatments. Inset in each panel of (e) shows the magnified region of arthritis. In (f), the red circle indicates the blue staining area.