| Literature DB >> 35992341 |
Shangjie Ge-Zhang1, Hong Yang1, Haiming Ni1, Hongbo Mu1, Mingming Zhang2.
Abstract
As an emerging fringe science, bionics integrates the understanding of nature, imitation of nature, and surpassing nature in one aspect, and it organically combines the synergistic complementarity of function and structure-function integrated materials which is of great scientific interest. By imitating the microstructure of a natural biological surface, the bionic superhydrophobic surface prepared by human beings has the properties of self-cleaning, anti-icing, water collection, anti-corrosion and oil-water separation, and the preparation research methods are increasing. The preparation methods of superhydrophobic surface include vapor deposition, etching modification, sol-gel, template, electrostatic spinning, and electrostatic spraying, which can be applied to fields such as medical care, military industry, ship industry, and textile. The etching modification method can directly modify the substrate, so there is no need to worry about the adhesion between the coating and the substrate. The most obvious advantage of this method is that the obtained superhydrophobic surface is integrated with the substrate and has good stability and corrosion resistance. In this article, the different preparation methods of bionic superhydrophobic materials were summarized, especially the etching modification methods, we discussed the detailed classification, advantages, and disadvantages of these methods, and the future development direction of the field was prospected.Entities:
Keywords: bionic modification; chemical etching method; etching modification method; laser-etching method; micro/nanostructure; superhydrophobic surface
Year: 2022 PMID: 35992341 PMCID: PMC9388738 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.958095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
The surface structure of typical organisms.
| Biological surface | Properties | References |
|---|---|---|
| Lotus leaf | Superhydrophobic, self-cleaning |
|
| Rose petal | Superhydrophobic, high surface adhesion | ( |
| Rice leaf | Superhydrophobic, directional transport | ( |
| Nepenthes | Directional transport, water harvesting | ( |
| Purple setcreasea | Double-sided superhydrophobic |
|
| Watermelon leaf | Single-order scale hydrophobic structure |
|
| Peanut leaf | Superhydrophobic, high surface adhesion | ( |
| Bamboo leaf | Anti-icing, high surface adhesion | ( |
| Gecko foot | High surface adhesion, self-cleaning | ( |
| Cicada wing | Self-cleaning, anti-reflective | ( |
| Shark skin | Self-cleaning, underwater drag reduction | ( |
| Penguin feather | Anti-icing, liquid guidance | ( |
| Butterfly wings | Self-cleaning, liquid-directed | ( |
| Spider silk | Collecting water |
|
| Earthworm | Drag reduction, lubrication |
|
| Mosquito compound eyes | Superhydrophobic, anti-fog |
|
FIGURE 1Etching modification (A), electrospinning and electrospraying (B), vapor phase deposition (C), sol–gel (D), template (E) and layer-by-layer self-assembly (F) methods developed to fabricate superhydrophobic surfaces.
Comparison of preparation methods of superhydrophobic surface.
| Preparation method | Principle | Cost | Efficiency | Equipment requirement | Environmental friendliness | Durability | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical etching | Etchant etching | Inexpensive | Efficient | Low-demand | Harmful | Nondurable | ( |
| Laser etching | High-energy laser beam | Expensive | Inefficient | High-demand | Harmless | Durable | ( |
| Chemical vapor deposition | Chemical vapor reaction | Inexpensive | Fair | Low-demand | Harmful | Durable | ( |
| Physical vapor deposition | Vaporization followed by deposition | Inexpensive | Efficient | High-demand | Harmless | Fair | ( |
| Electrospinning and electrospraying method | Droplet spraying and stretching in electric field | Inexpensive | Efficient | Low-demand | Harmless | Nondurable | ( |
| Sol-gel method | Hydrolytic condensation of compounds under liquid phase | Inexpensive | Inefficient | Low-demand | Harmful | Nondurable | ( |
| Template method | Post-compression modifications | Fair | Inefficient | Low-demand | Harmless | Durable | ( |
| Layer-by-layer self-assembly method | Inter-particle electrostatic interaction | Inexpensive | Inefficient | Low-demand | Harmless | Nondurable | ( |
FIGURE 2Schematic diagram of chemical etching and grafting.
FIGURE 3Schematic diagram of (A) laser heat treatment and (B) cold treatment.
FIGURE 4Directional comparison between (A) chemical etching and (B) laser etching.
Simple summary of common etching methods of different substrates.
| Substrate | Common methods | References |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum (Al) | Chemical Etching (Cl− Ion) | ( |
| Magnesium (Mg) | Chemical Etching (SO4 − Ion) | ( |
| Stainless Steel | Chemical Etching (Cl− Ion) | ( |
| Glass | Laser Etching (Plasma) | ( |
| Polymer | Laser Etching (Plasma) | ( |