| Literature DB >> 31590692 |
Lene Kristiansen1, L H Magnussen2, K T Wilhelmsen2, S Mæland2, S H G Nordahl3,4, R Clendaniel5, A Hovland6,7, B Juul-Kristensen8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dizziness is a common complaint, and the symptom often persists, together with additional complaints. A treatment combining Vestibular Rehabilitation (VR) and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is suggested. However, further research is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of such an intervention. The objective of this paper is to present the design of a randomised controlled trial aiming at evaluating the efficacy of an integrated treatment of VR and CBT on dizziness, physical function, psychological complaints and quality of life in persons with persistent dizziness. METHODS/Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive behaviour therapy; Dizziness Handicap Inventory; Gait velocity; Persistent dizziness; Protocol; RCT; Rehabilitation; Vestibular rehabilitation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31590692 PMCID: PMC6781377 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3660-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Figure of study protocol
| Study period | |||||
| Enrolment | Post allocation | ||||
| Timepoint | Month 0-2 | Month 1-6 | 6 months | 12 months | |
| Enrolment | |||||
| Eligibility screen | X | ||||
| Informed consent | X | ||||
| Allocation | X | ||||
| Interventions | |||||
| BI-VR | X | ||||
| VR-CBT | X | ||||
| Assessments | |||||
| Dizziness Handicap Inventory | X | X | X | ||
| Preferred gait velocity | X | X | X | ||
| Vertigo Symptom scale- Short form | X | X | X | ||
| Body Sensation Questionnaire | X | X | X | ||
| Adapted Panic attack Scale | X | X | X | ||
| Mobility Index, Alone | X | X | X | ||
| Panic attack scale | X | X | X | ||
| Patient Specific function questionnaire | X | X | X | ||
| Subjective Health complaints | X | X | X | ||
| Patient global impression of change | X | X | |||
| Chalders fatigue questionnaire | X | X | X | ||
| EQ5D-5L | X | X | X | ||
| Body sway in standing | X | X | X | ||
| Head movement induced dizziness | X | X | X | ||
| Fast gait velocity | X | X | X | ||
| Clinical dynamic visual acuity | X | X | X | ||
| Elements from GPE | X | X | X | ||
| Dual task walking | X | X | X | ||
| Grip strength | X | X | x | ||
Brief description of the Vestibular Rehabilitation and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (VR-CBT) group-treatment protocol
| Session number | Focus | Example of tasks/exercises |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dizziness and additional/secondary complaints | Discussion on dizziness and additional complaints. Introducing the vicious circle that can arise between somatic symptoms and the catastrophic misinterpretation of these. Exercises: bdy awareness in sitting and standing. Habituation (nodding and head turns) |
| 2 | The ‘vicious circle’ | How somatic symptoms related to both dizziness and anxiety can be appraised appropriately by mapping the relevant symptoms, thoughts and potential avoidance behaviour for each participant. Introducing the ‘fight or flight’ response, and how this may be relevant for chronic dizziness. Exercises: body awareness in standing and walking, habituation through games with planned and unplanned head turns. Relaxation |
| 3 | The fight or flight response | Discussion regarding experiences related to symptoms similar to the fight or flight response. How can these symptoms be appraised in relation to persistent dizziness? Exercises: habituation and body awareness (standing balance, walking with directional changes). Reflection during and after exercises. What happened? What was your response? (every session from now). Relaxation |
| 4 | The fight or flight response and management | Discussion: how did you respond to the fight or flight response in everyday life following the last session? Individual goal setting. Exercises: habituation, visual acuity, walking and ball games with change of place, turning and rotation. Relaxation |
| 5 | Relaxation | Discussion/reflection: exercises, dosage and ‘relaxation’. It is normal to be dizzy and tired after exercises Exercises: progression of visual acuity, habituation and balance using ball during exercise. Working alone and in pairs. Relaxation |
| 6 | Movement-induced dizziness | Any changes in relation to the dizziness circle described in the first session? Group and individual reflection. Exercises: habituation games: in larger groups and pairs. Walking with head rotations, velocity changes and externally induced stop/start. Relaxation |
| 7 | What next? Preparation for the future | Discussion before, reflection during, and group reflection after exercises: ‘How do I cope/deal/manage the dizziness? What thoughts are formed when I get dizzy?’ Exercises: combination of balance and habituation – Activities and games in groups and in pairs. (e.g. obstacle course, standing back to back, passing ball at different heights.). Relaxation |
| 8 | Reflection and conclusion | Discussion: ‘What have I learnt? What will I take with me? What do I do when/if dizziness returns?’ Exercises: balance and body awareness in standing and walking, changing directions, different velocities, stop/start. Ball activities alone, in pairs and in a larger group. Relaxation |
Description and test metrics of outcome measures
| Name | Scoring/description | Test metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome measures | ||
| Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) | 25 items, each item has 3 alternative scores 0 (no), 2 (sometimes) and 4 (yes) giving a score range of 0–100 DHI points [ | Cut-off 29 points, MIC 11 DHI points, ICC 1,1 0.90 [ |
| Preferred gait velocity (m/s) | Participants walked at normal pace, down an 8-m pathway, timed in the middle 6 m. It was timed using a stopwatch from when the first foot passed the start point to when the last foot passed the stop point. Mean velocity over two trials were calculated | Substantial meaningful change 0.1 m/s [ ICC (3.1): 0.88 (CI 0.81–0.98) [ |
| Secondary outcomes/patient-reported outcomes | ||
| The shortened version of the Vertigo Symptom Scale (VSS) | 15 items, each scoring from 0 (never) to 4 (very often) giving a score range of 0–60. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity [ | Norwegian version cut-off, 6.5 points [ Clinically significant change in original version ≥ 3 points [ ICC Norwegian version, 0.89 [ |
| Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ) | 14 items, each rated on a scale ranging from 1 (thought never occurs when I am nervous) to 5 (thought always occurs when I am nervous) [ The mean score is reported, and higher scores imply greater levels of fear | Cronbach’s alpha for outpatients with agoraphobia, 0.80 [ |
| Body Sensation Questionnaire (BSC) | 18 items, each with a score range from 1 (not at all frightened by the sensations) to 5 (extremely frightened by this sensation). The mean score reported, and higher scores implies greater fear of somatic sensations [ | Cronbach’s alpha for outpatients with agoraphobia, 0.87 [ |
| Mobility Inventory of Agoraphobia-Alone (MIA) | 27 items, each rated from 1 (never avoids) to 5 (always avoids). The mean score is reported and, and higher scores indicate greater avoidance behaviour | Cronbach’s alpha in agoraphobia, 0.96 [ |
| Adapted Panic Attack Scale | ||
| • Attack frequency | Measures frequency of distress related to sudden onsets of episodes with 4 or more strong sensations of dizziness and dizziness related symptoms on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (no attacks) to 4 (one or more attacks per day). Adapted from the Panic Attack Scale [ | |
| • Attack severity | Severity rating of the degree of distress related to the episodes described above. Numeric rating scale with a score range 0–8. Higher scores indicates increased symptom-related distress/disability. Adapted from the Panic Attack Scale [ | |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 14 items, each rated from 0 (not present) to 3 (considerable), giving a score range of 0–42 points [ | Cut-off 12 points, Cronbach’s alpha, 0.88. [ |
| EQ-5D-5 L | Generic instrument describing and valuing health [ | |
| • EQ-5D-5 L | Five dimensions, each rated from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate increased health problems [ | |
| • EQ-5D-5 L Vas | Score range 0–100%. Higher scores indicate better perceived health-related quality of life | MCID in stroke,:8.61–10.82 [ |
| Subjective Health Complaints (SHC) | 29 items, each item is scored from 0 (no complaints) to 3 (serious complaints). Higher scores indicate greater severity of complaint. Split into 5 subcategories: Musculoskeletal 8 items (score 0–24), Pseudoneurology 7 items (score 0–21), Gastrointestinal 7 items (score 0–21), Flu 2 items (score 0–6) and Allergy 5 items (score 0–15) [ | Cronbach’s alpha musculoskeletal pain, 0.74; Pseudoneurology, 0.73; Gastrointestinal, 0.62; Allergy, 0.58; and Flu, 0.67 [ |
| Chalder’s Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ) | 13 items. The first 11 items are scored from 0 (better than usual) to 3 (much worse than usual), giving a score range of 0–33. The last 2 items rate duration and constancy of fatigue [ | Cronbach’s alpha in Norwegian population, 0.86 [ |
| Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) | Registers up to 3 activities that participants find difficult. In addition, the level of difficulty is rated on an 11-point scale [ | Reliability established in various musculoskeletal problems (ICC 0.76–0.97) [ MCID in various musculoskeletal problems, 0.99–2.5 [ |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PCIG) | 1item, rated from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change [ | |
| Secondary outcomes/physical tests | ||
| Dual-task walking | Similar walking protocol as for preferred gait velocity, with an added task of counting backwards by 3 out loud, while walking. Each trial was timed and the numbers of miscounts were documented. Mean velocity, and mistakes over 2 trials calculated | |
| Fast gait velocity (m/s) | Similar protocol to preferred gait velocity; however, participants were asked to walk as fast as possible | |
| Clinical dynamic visual acuity (CDVA) | Evaluates gaze stability by assessing visual acuity using examiner-mediated head oscillations at 2 Hz relative to head being stationary | Cut-off ≥ 3 lines indicates potential vestibular hypofunction [ |
| Head-movement-induced dizziness | Perceived dizziness reported using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) on 2 conditions: 1 while sitting stationary, and 1 after 1 min of active head oscillations at 1 Hz (following a metronome). Score range 0 (no dizziness) to 10 (as bad as it can be), with higher scores indicating higher perceived intensity of head-movement-induced dizziness. Difference between the two conditions will also be calculated | VAS head-movement-induced dizziness [ reliability 0.48 for all subjects, reliability 0.82 for male subjects |
| Grip strength | Maximal grip strength in both hands assessed using a hand-held dynamometer. Measured in kg. Averaged between 2 trials calculated for each hand | Genuine change in healthy adults, 6 kg [ |
| Body sway while standing | Assessed using the modified test for interaction and balance (mCTSIB) with arms crossed over the chest, using the HURlabs balance trainer BTG4; 4 conditions tested: standing with eyes open and closed, on a firm surface or on a foam cushion. Each trial is timed for 30 s | ICC in healthy subjects, 0.91–0.97 [ |
| Elements from the Global Physiotherapy Examination (GPE) | 4 elements from the main domain Movement of the GPE examination were selected [ Score range − 2.3 to 2.3, scored in relation to a predefined standard (0) [ | ICC 2.1 lumbo-sacral flexion, 0.82; ICC 2.1 head-nod flexion, 0.84; ICC 2.1 shoulder retraction, 0.75; ICC 2.1 elbow drop, 0.89 (personal communication: A. Kvåle) |
Abbreviations: ICC Intercal correlation coefficient, MCID minimal clinical important difference, mCTSIB Modified test for sensory interaction and balance, MIC minimal important change