| Literature DB >> 31590251 |
Abstract
. Protecting Cultural Heritage (CH) from corrosion and other environmental damages, mainly involving metallic or organic layers contained in artwork, represents a major challenge for conservation scientists. Electrochemical techniques provide useful information about the deterioration effects of metallic coatings and organic layers. Recently, Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) has been successfully applied in the study of metallic corrosion. However, EIS has not succeeded in becoming a routine technique, due to problems regarding both instrumental apparatus (which is not ideal for in situ analysis, especially with previous cell configurations), and the difficulty with data processing. At the same time, new portable electrochemical sensors, immunosensors, and biosensors have successfully made a scientific impact, mainly with in situ diagnosis of organic components contained in CH objects. For this purpose, this review presents two sections: the first describes the analytical optimization of impedance electrochemical cell geometries that are suitable for in situ metal-coating investigation; the second reports on the assembly of small electrochemical sensors, immunosensors, and biosensors, which useful for in situ organic layer characterization. This overview summarizes the state of the art regarding the application of electrochemical techniques and small electrochemical devices as alternative tools for the understanding of CH.Entities:
Keywords: biosensors; cultural heritage; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); graphene oxide; metallic corrosion; portable immunosensors; screen-printed electrodes (SPEs); small sensors; voltammetric techniques
Year: 2019 PMID: 31590251 PMCID: PMC6806333 DOI: 10.3390/s19194303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Scheme 1Number of scientific papers per year for smartphone-based chemical sensors, wireless and wearable biosensors, tracked through the Web of Science database, as reported in reference [23]).
Figure 1Electrochemical cell for metal detection in CH objects, reproduced with permission from [25]).
Figure 2A Contact Probe (CP), reproduced and reprinted with permission from [30].
Figure 3(A): Solid agarose gel electrolyte: scheme (up) and photograph (down); (B): zoom of a solid agarose gel. Reproduced and reprinted here with permission from [30] and [31], respectively.
Figure 4(a): EC showing an ideal metal-coating system; (b) a damaged coating; and (c) different EC schemes proposed to represent archaeological copper alloys. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [41].
The most representative cases of studies investigated by ECs for a correct EIS profiles/data evaluation.
| Original Metal Samples | Equivalent Circuit (ECs) and Electrical Elements | Real Case of Study: Original Metal Coatings/Layers | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Randles circuit with Re that is the electrolyte resistance; CPEdl is the double-layer capacitance; Rct is the charge transfer resistance, and finally W is the Warburg impedance for copper ions, during their diffusion through the oxide film | The Randles circuit was analytically standardize and validated, by using the standard corrosion events of copper in slightly mineralized neutral aqueous solutions (such as tap water, as conventional working medium) | [ |
|
| A variation of the previous Randles circuit consists of the charge transfer resistances of cathodic and anodic processes, are in parallel in different branches of the circuit | The EIS spectra, acquired with the modified Randles circuit, was applied to recorded EIS profiles for artistic bronze coupons in artificial rain | [ |
|
| Other authors have applied a simple two nested (R-CPE) couple circuit, but fitting results showing the exponent of the second CPE close to 0.5, suggesting a diffusion impedance, both in copper and brass | Copper and brass surfaces for application of the two nested (R-CPE) couple of electrochemical circuits | [ |
|
| The first EC (where the pair CPEdl-Rct is not considered to be electrical equivalent element) represents the double-layer patina morphology, quite similar to the anodized layers in aluminum model, which consist of a thin barrier layer covered by a porous outer layer | This equivalent circuit describes the outdoor copper and bronze patinas, exhibiting a double-layer structure. In particular, the inner layer contains cuprous oxide materials and an outer layer, appears more porous for the presence of different cupric compounds, depending on the environment to which the object is exposed and located | [ |
|
| The second EC with two nested (R-CPE) couple circuit, represents the impedance of the inner and outer patina layer. Considering an exponent value of 0.5 for the CPE in the inner layer, a Warburg/W impedance, could replace the CPE final circuit. | The same EC was applied to study the response of bronze roman coins and natural copper patinas, formed during 1–3 years in Chile in different environments, with different thickness and porosity depending on their location | [ |
|
| Three nested (R-CPE) circuits were reported in the literature, to explain the electrochemical output signals regarding artificial patinas, putting in Na2SO4-NaHCO3, as working electrolytes. The first (R-CPE) pair represents the resistance and capacitance of the patina, the second (R-CPE), at intermediate frequencies, represents the corrosion process on the metal surface, while third (R-CPE) couple that corresponds to the low-frequency loop is explained as a result of oxidation–reduction processes of the corrosion products taking place at the electrode surface | A first example of this three nested (R-CPE) circuits is the EIS spectrum profiles of samples, collected by a brass object, excavated from the archaeological area of Tharros, in 0.1 M NaCl (as working electrolyte). | [ |
|
| Two-cell EC have been applied to describe the impedance of the two interfaces: metal/rust layer and rust layer/electrolyte, respectively. A third time constant seems to be present at low frequencies, applying the R(RC(C[RW])) model and performing measurements in the G-PE cell | Regarding the Two-cell EC circuits electrochemical studies were carried out on weathering steel sculptures from Adriana Veyrat; Politecnico di Torino performed EIS measurements on historic iron surface/coating belonging to the Notre-Dame Cathedral of Amiens and the Metz Cathedral, in France | [ |
|
| A metal-coating system is a capacitor and a resistance in parallel, according to the capacitance (Ccoat) and resistance (Rcoat) of the metal coating in series with the resistance of the working electrolyte, (Re). In highly protective coatings, Rcoat is very high and the system becomes Ccoat in series with Re (no current crosses the resistance). When the coating deteriorates the circuit, changes and the main electric components/elements are Cdl (the double-layer capacitance and Rct (the charge transfer resistance) of the corrosion process that occurs at the metal-electrolyte interface. This circuit was applied to the characterization of organic coatings, including varnishes and waxes for bronze and historic steel artwork objects | Not reported cases of studies on original samples | [ |
|
| The EC circuits are the same of the clean surfaces, only differing in the values of different parameters | Not reported cases of studies on original samples | [ |
Scheme 2Equivalent Circuits (ECs) reported in Table 1, in particular: (A) represents the AC: Alternative Current Impedance Spectroscopy for copper in simulated tap water. (B) Represents the electrical equivalent circuit used for fitting EIS data in the presence of copper/alloy-coated patina. (C) Shows the EIS measuring principle and the corresponding EC carried out on iron/steel-coated patina. (D1) Cell design scheme (on the left); bronze coupons used for the electrochemical tests (in the middle D2) and the Equivalent electrical circuits (D3) used to analyze EIS data: (a) is the equivalent circuit with 2 nested CPE-R pairs, and (b) is the second CPE replaced by a generalized finite-length Warburg impedance.
Main characteristics and analytical performance of Setup 1 and Setup 2 proposed in the first section of the review.
| Electrochemical Configurations | Quantitative Analysis | Qualitative Analysis | Main Advantages | Main Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ---------------------------- | ✓ | easy sensor geometry for in situ manipulation | Stiff (not flexible) contact probe and the liquid conductive electrolytes provoke electrochemical contact problems toward the surface of cultural heritage, compromising the final electrochemical measurements | |
| ---------------------------- | ✓ | Flexible cell geometries suitable for CH surfaces (with significant roughness) | The difficulty of processing the acquired experimental data by ECs, working with Nyquist plot |
✓ Qualitative analysis is present in each electrochemical small-sensor prototype; --------------: this symbol means that the specific parameter is not reported in the paper.
Figure 5(A): Scheme of the miniaturized equipment with a SEM micrograph of the electrode surface, with a typical Raman spectral profile, as output signal. (B) Shows on (a) a typical electrochemical Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) profile for a para-aminothiophenol modified electrode; (b) a typical SERS profile (for a specific analyte, such as p,p′-dimercaptoazobenzene_DMAB) depending on its redox potential. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [14].
Figure 6(a): Scheme of the experimental setup for a electrochemical impedance measurements combined with a simultaneous X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis of the resulting secondary corrosion metal compounds produced during the deterioration events that occur on metallic coating, present on Cultural Heritage (CH) surfaces; (b): Cross-section of the reference electrode. (c): The time-resolved spectra typical profiles. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [15].
Figure 7(a): 1 is the image of the original leather cover. From 2 to 6: SEM of the leather samples (flower side and flesh side of the skin/leather samples). In (b): (A) represents the calibration for As(III), (B) represents the calibration for Fe(III), (C) shows FE-SEM/EDAX micrographs, before (left image) and after (right image) GO modification of SPEs. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [16].
Comparative study between GO/SPE and ICP-MS for As(III) and Fe(III) quantification.
| Sample As(III) | GO/SPEs by SWCSV (μg/L) | Total Inorganic As: [As(III) + As(V)] | ICP-MS (μg/L) | P Value (t-Test)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 992 ± 2 | 101 ± 2 | 100.80 ± 0.5 | 0.01 |
| 2 | 100 ± 1 | 100 ± 1 | 100.00 ± 0.02 | 0.03 |
| 3 | 102 ± 2 | 103 ± 1 | 103.05 ± 0.5 | 0.02 |
| Sample Fe(III) | ||||
| 1 | 399 ± 1 | 400 ± 1 | 400 ± 1 | 0.04 |
| 2 | 400 ± 2 | 400 ± 2 | 400 ± 0,2 | 0.01 |
| 3 | 402 ± 1 | 403 ± 0.3 | 403 ± 1 | 0.03 |
a: two-sided t-test to compare means from heteroscedastic data. Data reported on Table 3 are reproduced and reprinted with permission from [16].
Main characteristics of the most important electrochemical sensors applied in CH, mainly presented in this review.
| Electrochemical Devices | Quantitative Analysis | Qualitative Analysis | Main Advantages | Main Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raman spectrometer, equipped with a potentiostatic apparatus | LOD = 5 ppm (mg/L) for melamine | ✓ | low cost measurement, | Non-electroactive pigments and organic binders cannot quantify by electrochemistry |
| Electrochemical cell, which also works like a Bragg tool | ---------------------------- | ✓ | to detect different crystallographic phases during serious corrosion events, | not all the corrosion products, to which different crystallographic phases belong, have electrochemical activity, therefore the disadvantage is that there is only qualitative crystallographic information |
| Screen-Printed Electrodes (SPEs) chemically modified with Graphene Oxide (GO); | See | ✓ | Voltammetric techniques are useful to understand two important aspects, as -the chemical-physical composition of the colors; | Particularly useful only in the case of metals contained in inks, colored pigments and organic compounds |
| micro-sample coatings in Paraloid B72 film-modified electrodes, combined with | ---------------------------- | ✓ | micro-sample coatings in Paraloid B72-film provide the possibility of pre-concentrating the pigments to increase the Signal/Noise ratio, especially in the presence of traces of organic materials | micro-sample coatings in Paraloid B72-film are not so selective and for this purpose several interferences and/or passivation/fouling effects can occur during analysis/measurements |
✓ Qualitative analysis is performed; --------------: this symbol means that the specific parameter is not reported in the paper.
Figure 8(A): Scheme of the immunosensor. (B): Cyclic Voltammograms reported on the left show: (a) CVs of OVA-immunosensor after incubation in the extract canvas, before and after the addition of glucose; (b) CVs of methylene blue at NEE IgY immunosensors incubated with canvas sample, before and after the addition of hydrogen peroxide. (c) and (d) show the same conditions of (a) and (b) but working with the original sampled Virgin. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [18].
Figure 9(A): is a scheme of the BQ detection. In (B), there are: (a) SECM approach curve obtained with and without H2O2; (b) represents the optical image of sample; (c) represents SECM scan plots, acquired with and without hydrogen peroxide. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [19].
Summary of the best analytical performance for the immunosensors described and compared in this section of the review.
| Immunosensor Prototype | Quantitative Analysis | Qualitative Analysis | Main Advantages | Main Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nano-Electrode Ensembles (NEEs) immunosensors for the detection of ovalbumin in paintings | ✓ | ----------------------------------- | High selectivity and specificity for the proteins and organic binder recognition, more than FTIR traditional method | No quantification of the organic component in paintings and this could represent a lack of useful information for restorers |
| Nano-Electrode Ensembles (NEEs) immunosensors for the detection of egg yolk in tempera and paintings | ✓ | ----------------------------------- | High selectivity and specificity for the proteins and egg yolk recognition, more than FTIR traditional method | No quantification of the organic component in paintings and this could represent a lack of useful information for restorers |
| Scanning Electro-Chemical Microscopy (SECM) immunosensors | ✓ | ------------------------------------ | Immunochemical stratigraphic SECM is excellent to selectively identify the organic components in the painting layers | Low reproducibility due to the passivation/fouling of the scanning/electrode-based tip |
✓ Qualitative analysis is performed; --------------: this symbol means that the specific parameter is not reported in the paper.
Figure 10(A) Cross-section of the biosensor prototype. (B) The analytical signals of fluorescent-labeled Listeria cells. (C) Typical impedance growth curves of Listeria cells. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [21].
Figure 11On the left of picture, a typical scheme of the Surface Plasmon Resonance biosensor assembly has been highlighted. On the right, a typical resonance response plot is also shown. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [22].
Figure 12Original sample to test biosensor (left). In the center, SPR-biosensor data relative to Highly Viscous Polymeric Dispersion extracts from the gilded and painted zone. The graphs to the right show the processed data. Reproduced and reprinted with permission from [22].
Summary of the best analytical performances for the electrochemical biosensors.
| Biosensor Prototype | Quantitative Analysis | Qualitative Analysis | Main Advantages | Main Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impedance biosensor devices, recording Faradaic signal, in the presence of the electroactive probes | ✓ | Linear range of concentration: | High selectivity and sensitivity toward the organic binder recognition, more than FTIR traditional method. The biosensor regeneration opportunity | The inadequacy, in some case studies, of the Randles model equivalent electrical circuit to describe the electrochemical impedance biosensor prototypes |
| Impedance biosensor devices, recording non-Faradaic signal, without the electroactive probes | ✓ | Linear range of concentration: | High Signal/Noise ratio | Possible Fouling and passivation phenomenon with interference on the output signals due to the stable chemical bonds between bacteria suspension and the immobilized antibodies |
| Surface Plasmon Resonance-based biosensors | ✓ | The direct assay of albumen/yolk mixture recognized the presence of both chemical analytes (140.0 ± 5.6 RU) for (anti-OVA) channel, (123.3 ± 4.9 RU) for (anti-IgY) channel. | The experimental results confirmed that very short application times were enough to extract useful information and, at the same time, they were ideal for avoiding invasive treatments on original artwork surfaces | The main analytical problem could be related to the interference when in absence of Highly Viscous Polymeric Dispersions (HVPDs) extracts from original samples |
✓ Qualitative analysis is present in each electrochemical small-sensor prototype.