A peridomestic Aedes malayensis population in Singapore can transmit yellow fever virus.

The case-fatality rate of yellow fever virus (YFV) is one of the highest among arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses). Although historically, the Asia-Pacific region has remained free of YFV, the risk of introduction has never been higher due to the increasing influx of people from endemic regions and the recent outbreaks in Africa and South America. Singapore is a global hub for trade and tourism and therefore at high risk for YFV introduction. Effective control of the main domestic mosquito vector Aedes aegypti in Singapore has failed to prevent re-emergence of dengue, chikungunya and Zika viruses in the last two decades, raising suspicions that peridomestic mosquito species untargeted by domestic vector control measures may contribute to arbovirus transmission. Here, we provide empirical evidence that the peridomestic mosquito Aedes malayensis found in Singapore can transmit YFV. Our laboratory mosquito colony recently derived from wild Ae. malayensis in Singapore was experimentally competent for YFV to a similar level as Ae. aegypti controls. In addition, we captured Ae. malayensis females in one human-baited trap during three days of collection, providing preliminary evidence that host-vector contact may occur in field conditions. Finally, we detected Ae. malayensis eggs in traps deployed in high-rise building areas of Singapore. We conclude that Ae. malayensis is a competent vector of YFV and re-emphasize that vector control methods should be extended to target peridomestic vector species.

Introduction

The case-fatality rate of yellow fever virus (YFV) ranges from 15% to 50% [1] and is one of the highest among arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses). YFV is endemic in 47 countries in Africa and South America, with an estimated annual incidence of around 200,000 cases and 30,000 deaths [2]. Despite an efficient vaccine against YFV, the past few years have seen a growing number of YFV outbreaks (Democratic Republic of the Congo, Angola, Uganda, Brazil and most recently Nigeria) [3-5]. During such outbreaks, increasing numbers of unvaccinated travelers who become infected and return to non-endemic countries have raised the risk of YFV introduction to unprecedented levels [6]. The Asia-Pacific region has remained free of YFV until now but the risk of introduction has never been higher [6-8]. In 2016, eleven Chinese workers infected with YFV in Angola who returned to China were the first cases of YFV diagnosed in travelers to Asia [7]. Over two billion immunologically naïve people live in Asia and the current vaccine production capacity would be insufficient to prevent a massive YFV epidemic, while mosquito control programs would be overwhelmed [8].

With 18.5 million visitors in 2018, Singapore is a global hub for tourism, trade and transport that includes one of the busiest ports in the world and a major international airport. These features put Singapore at high risk for introduction of arboviruses, including YFV. Strict and sustained vector control measures together with household structural improvements, currently achieve very low densities of the domestic arbovirus vector Aedes aegypti [9]. Re-emergence of dengue virus (DENV), chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and Zika virus in Singapore in the last two decades [10-13] supports the hypothesis that peridomestic mosquito species untargeted by vector control measures may contribute to ‘cryptic’ arbovirus transmission [14]. In particular, the peridomestic mosquito Aedes malayensis (a member of the Stegomyia subgenus) breeds in urban parks of Singapore and is experimentally competent for DENV and CHIKV [14].

Here, we evaluated the potential contribution of the peridomestic mosquito Ae. malayensis to YFV transmission in Singapore. Vector competence assays in the laboratory and a small-scale field survey provided evidence that indeed Ae. malayensis could contribute to YFV transmission in Singapore.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study used human blood samples to prepare mosquito artificial infectious blood meals. Healthy donor recruitment was organized by the local investigator assessment using medical history, laboratory results and clinical examinations. Biological samples were supplied through participation of healthy volunteers at the ICAReB biobanking platform (BB-0033-00062/ICAReB platform/Institut Pasteur, Paris/BBMRI AO203/[BIORESOURCE]) of the Institut Pasteur to the CoSImmGen and Diagmicoll protocols, which have been approved by the French Ethical Committee Ile-de-France I. The Diagmicoll protocol was declared to the French Research Ministry under reference DC 2008–68 COL 1. The use of human-baited double net trap was approved by the National Environment Agency (NEA) of Singapore (NEA/PH/CLB/19-00004). All adult subjects provided written informed consent.

Mosquitoes

Experiments were carried out with a laboratory colony derived in 2014 from a wild population of Ae. malayensis in Singapore and subsequently maintained at the Duke-NUS Medical School for >50 generations [14]. The 8th generation of a laboratory colony of Ae. aegypti maintained at the Institut Pasteur in Laos was used as a control. The Ae. malayensis colony was initiated with mosquito eggs collected from two forested areas located in the Northern (Sembawang) and the Southern (East Coast Park) regions of Singapore [14]. The Ae. aegypti colony originated in the town of Paksan, Paksan district, Bolikhamsai province, Laos. Mosquitoes were reared under controlled insectary conditions (28°C, 70% relative humidity, 12:12 hour light cycle). Eggs were hatched synchronously in a vacuum chamber for 1 hour. Larvae were reared in 24 x 34 x 9 cm plastic trays containing 1.5 L of dechlorinated tap water and supplemented with Tetramin (Tetra) fish food at a density of 400 larvae per tray. Six hundred adults were kept in 30 x 30 x 30 cm Bugdorm-1 insect cages with permanent access to 10% sucrose solution.

Virus

Vector competence experiments were carried out with a low-passage YFV isolate (YFV-S79 strain) belonging to the West African lineage, which was originally obtained in 1979 from the serum of a patient returning to France from Senegal [15]. Prior to its use in the experiments, the YFV isolate was passaged twice in newborn mouse brains and three times in Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells. Virus stock was produced during the last passage, as previously described for DENV [16]. Virus titration was performed by standard focus-forming assay (FFA), as previously described for DENV [16] with the exception of the primary antibody. A mouse anti-flavivirus group antigen monoclonal antibody MAB10216 (Merck Millipore) diluted 1:1,000 in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (Interchim) was used as primary antibody.

Virus challenge

In two separate experiments (referred to as experiments 1 and 2 hereafter), mosquitoes were orally challenged with YFV as previously described for DENV [16]. Briefly, eight-day-old females deprived of sucrose for 24 hours were offered an artificial infectious blood meal in 3 rounds of 15 min using a Hemotek membrane feeding apparatus with porcine intestine as the membrane. Blood meals consisted of a 2:1 mix of washed human erythrocytes and virus suspension. Adenosine triphosphate (Merck) was added as a phagostimulant [17] to the blood meal at a final concentration of 10 mM. To obtain a dose-response curve, three separate blood meals with increasing YFV concentrations were prepared. In experiment 1, mosquitoes were exposed to 2.9 x 106 focus-forming units (FFUs)/mL, 2.1 x 105 FFUs/mL, or 1.8 x 104 FFUs/mL of YFV. In experiment 2, they were exposed to 8.1 x 105 FFUs/mL, 5.4 x 104 FFUs/mL, or 3.6 x 103 FFUs/mL of YFV. Fully engorged females were sorted on wet ice, transferred into 0.5-L cardboard containers and maintained in a climatic chamber (28°C, 70% relative humidity, 12:12 hour light cycle) with permanent access to 10% sucrose solution. At 10 and 14 days post blood meal, mosquitoes were cold anesthetized (experiment 1) or paralyzed with triethylamine (experiment 2) to perform in vitro salivation [18]. In experiment 1, the wings and legs were removed and stored at -80°C prior to the salivation assay. In experiment 2, the heads were removed and stored at -80°C after the salivation assay. The proboscis of each female was inserted into a 20-μL pipet tip containing 5 μL of fetal bovine serum (FBS). After 30 min of salivation, the body remainders were stored dry at -80°C. The saliva-containing FBS was mixed with 45 μL of Leibovitz’s L-15 medium and immediately inoculated onto C6/36 cells for titration by FFA, as described above, without subsequent dilution.

Virus detection

Bodies were homogenized individually in 300 μL of lysis buffer (Tris 10 mM, NaCl 50 mM, EDTA 1.27 mM with a final pH adjusted to 8.2) supplemented with proteinase K (1 μL for 55.5 μL of buffer). Body homogenates were centrifuged and 100 μL of supernatant was incubated for 5 min at 56°C then 10 min at 98°C to extract viral RNA. Detection of YFV RNA was performed using a two-step RT-PCR reaction to generate a 192-bp amplicon located in a conserved region of the NS3 gene of YFV. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA with random hexamers using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific) using the following program: 10 min at 25°C, 50 min at 37°C and 15 min at 70°C. The cDNA was subsequently amplified using DreamTaq DNA polymerase (ThermoFisher Scientific). The 20-μL reaction volume contained 1x of reaction mix and 10 μM of primers (forward: 5’-GCGTAAGGCTGGAAAGAGTG-3’; reverse: 5’-CTTCCTCCCTTCATCCACAA-3’; [19]). The thermocycling program was 2 min at 95°C, 35 cycles of 30 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 60°C, and 30 sec at 72°C with a final extension step of 7 min at 72°C. Amplicons were visualized by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. Mosquito wings/legs and heads were homogenized in 300 μL of Leibovitz’s L-15 medium supplemented with 2% FBS, centrifuged, and titrated by FFA as described above.

Host-vector contact

Adult mosquito sampling was conducted in a forested area in the northern part of Singapore (Sembawang; 1.456493, 103.825983) in March 2019. Host-vector contact was evaluated using a human-baited double net trap as previously described [20]. Briefly, a human volunteer was resting on a long chair inside a small, untreated bed-net protected from mosquitoes during daylight hours (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.). A larger bed-net covered the smaller one with a 30-cm opening at the bottom allowing mosquitoes to enter the 20-cm space between bed-nets. A large plastic sheet was placed above the bed-nets as a protection. Every 10 min, the human volunteer collected mosquitoes trapped between bed-nets using a mouth aspirator. Aspirated mosquitoes were transferred into holding cups, killed and grouped per 1-hour interval. Back in the laboratory, mosquitoes were morphologically identified and stored at -80°C.

Gravitrap survey

The presence of Ae. malayensis in Singapore’s high-rise public housing was assessed using surveillance data obtained in 2018 from the Singapore NEA. The island-wide Gravitrap surveillance network was implemented by NEA to monitor the spatial and temporal variability of adult Aedes mosquito populations and to evaluate the effectiveness of vector control measures. In 2018, approximately 53,000 Gravitraps were deployed in about 9,200 public apartment blocks across the island. The Gravitrap is a simple, hay infusion-filled cylindrical trap with a sticky inner surface to catch ovipositing gravid female Aedes mosquitoes [21].

Statistical analyses

Vector competence was estimated by measuring virus infection, dissemination and transmission rates. Infection rate was estimated as the proportion of YFV-positive mosquitoes among all mosquitoes tested. Dissemination rate was estimated as the proportion of infected mosquitoes with YFV-positive wings and legs (experiment 1) or head (experiment 2). Transmission rate was estimated as the proportion of mosquitoes with a disseminated infection that had YFV-positive saliva. In addition, transmission efficiency was calculated as the proportion of mosquitoes with infectious saliva among all mosquitoes tested. Vector competence indices were analyzed with a logistic regression model in which each individual mosquito was associated with a binary variable (1 = YFV-positive or 0 = YFV-negative), followed by an analysis of deviance with the R package car [22]. An initial analysis showed that infection rates were not statistically significantly different between 10 and 14 days post blood meal and both time points were subsequently combined. The analysis of dissemination and transmission rates was restricted to 14 days post blood meal because the two time points differed and there was too little data on day 10 for a meaningful analysis. The experiment effect was statistically non-significant overall and removed from the model. For infection and dissemination rates, the final regression model included the infectious dose (log10-transformed blood meal titer), the mosquito species (Ae. aegypti and Ae. malayensis), and their interaction. The 50% oral infectious dose (OID50) and 10% oral infectious dose (OID10) values and their respective 95% confidence intervals were derived from the logistic fits of infection rates using the R package MASS [23]. The analysis of transmission rate was restricted to the highest infectious dose and the final regression model only included the mosquito species. All statistical analyses were performed using the R software version 3.5.2 [24] and graphical representations were generated with the R packages ggplot2 [25] and ggpubr [26].

Results

We measured the vector competence of 68 and 31 Ae. malayensis females and 132 and 76 Ae. aegypti females in experiments 1 and 2, respectively. The data from both experiments were combined because initial analyses showed that none of the vector competence indices differed significantly between them. In each experiment, mosquitoes were exposed to three different YFV infectious doses to establish a dose-response curve. Vector competence was analyzed 14 days post blood meal, with the exception of infection rates that also included mosquitoes sampled at 10 days post blood meal.

The proportion of blood-fed females that became infected (i.e., the infection rate) increased with the infectious dose (Fig 1). The highest infectious dose (2.9 x 106 FFUs/mL) resulted in 74.5% and 75.6% infected females for Ae. malayensis and Ae. aegypti, respectively. Infectious dose was the only statistically significant (p < 0.0001) predictor of infection rate (Table 1), although there was a slight difference in the shape of the dose-response curve between the two species (Fig 1). Although the OID50 was similar between the two species, the OID10 was lower for Ae. aegypti. The OID50 was 5.97 log10 FFUs/mL (95% CI = 5.81–6.14 log10 FFUs/mL) for Ae. aegypti and 6.13 log10 FFUs/mL (95% CI = 6.02–6.25 log10 FFUs/mL) for Ae. malayensis. The OID10 was 5.03 log10 FFUs/mL (95% CI = 4.78–5.28 log10 FFUs/mL) for Ae. aegypti and 5.59 log10 FFUs/mL (95% CI = 5.41–5.78 log10 FFUs/mL) for Ae. malayensis.

Fig 1

Peridomestic Ae. malayensis in Singapore are orally susceptible to YFV.

Dose-response curves are shown for the Ae. malayensis population from Singapore under study and a control Ae. aegypti population. Infection rate is the proportion of blood-fed females testing YFV-positive 10–14 days post blood meal. Dissemination rate is the proportion of YFV-infected females with YFV-positive wings/legs or head 14 days post blood meal. The line represents the logistic regression of the data and the shaded area is the 95% confidence interval of the fit. The data shown are combined from two separate experiments.

Table 1

Test statistics of YFV infection and dissemination rates.

Infection and dissemination rates were analyzed by logistic regression. The model included the effect of the YFV oral infectious dose (log10-transformed blood meal titer), the mosquito species (Ae. aegypti or Ae. malayensis) and their interaction.

	Infection rate			Dissemination rate
	LR χ2	Df	p value	LR χ2	Df	p value
Dose	97.42	1	<0.0001	5.504	1	0.0190
Species	3.325	1	0.0682	1.040	1	0.3079
Dose x Species	3.099	1	0.0783	1.001	1	0.3171

Df: degrees of freedom; LR: likelihood ratio.

The proportion of infected females that developed a disseminated infection (i.e., the dissemination rate) also increased with infectious dose (Fig 1). The highest infectious dose resulted in 42.9% and 57.1% dissemination in Ae. malayensis and Ae. aegypti, respectively. Infectious dose was the only statistically significant (p < 0.0001) predictor of dissemination rate (Table 1). Together, these results indicated that although Ae. aegypti was slightly more susceptible than Ae. malayensis at low infectious doses, the two species had a similar YFV susceptibility overall.

The proportion of females with a disseminated infection that had YFV-positive saliva (i.e., the transmission rate) was measured at 14 days post blood meal only for the highest infectious dose (Fig 2). YFV was detected in the saliva of 33.3% (3/9) of Ae. malayensis females and 37.5% (3/8) of Ae. aegypti females, and the difference between the two species was not statistically significant (p = 0.8576). Vector competence can be summarized by the overall proportion of blood-fed females that had YFV-positive saliva at 14 days post blood meal at the highest infectious dose (i.e., the transmission efficiency). Transmission efficiency was 11.5% (3/26) for Ae. malayensis and 14.3% (3/21) for Ae. aegypti (Fig 2), and the difference between the two species was not statistically significant (p = 0.7795).

Fig 2

Peridomestic Ae. malayensis in Singapore are competent for YFV transmission.

Transmission potential is shown for the Ae. malayensis population from Singapore under study and a control Ae. aegypti population 14 days after oral exposure to 2.9 x 106 FFU/mL of YFV. Transmission rate is the proportion of females with a disseminated infection that had infectious YFV in their saliva 14 days post blood meal. Transmission efficiency is the proportion of all blood-fed females that had infectious YFV in their saliva 14 days post blood meal. Vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals of the proportions. The data shown are from two separate experiments.

In addition to vector competence, the ability of Ae. malayensis to transmit YFV depends on its propensity to bite humans. To assess host-vector contact of peridomestic Ae. malayensis in Singapore, we surveyed day-biting mosquitoes in a forested area of Sembawang, Singapore in March 2019 using a human-baited double net trap (Fig 3A). A total of 115 female mosquitoes were captured during three days of collection. The most abundant species was Ae. albopictus (89%) followed by Ae. malayensis (9%) (Fig 3B).

Fig 3

Peridomestic Ae. malayensis in Singapore are attracted to humans.

(A) Human-baited double net trap setup in the forested area of Sembawang, Singapore. (B) Distribution of mosquito species among 115 female specimens collected at daytime in the human-baited double net trap.

Out of 504,771 mosquitoes collected in Gravitraps deployed by NEA in Singapore’s high-rise public apartment blocks in 2018, the predominant mosquito species was Ae. aegypti (80% of all captures). However, a total of 1,931 Ae. malayensis (0.38%) were caught in 1,741 traps. The average capture rate was 0.0013 Ae. malayensis per trap and per week, with an average of 1.1 specimen per Ae. malayensis-positive trap.

Discussion

Our study indicates that peridomestic Ae. malayensis mosquitoes can contribute to YFV transmission in Singapore based on two lines of evidence. First, our laboratory mosquito colony recently derived from a wild Ae. malayensis population in Singapore was experimentally competent for YFV, to a level that was not statistically different from that of the Ae. aegypti controls. Adding to earlier data demonstrating vector competence of this colony for DENV and CHIKV [14], our results are the first experimental evidence, to our knowledge, that peridomestic Ae. malayensis from Singapore can potentially transmit YFV acquired from an infectious blood meal. Second, we captured Ae. malayensis females in a human-baited trap. Although our host-seeking experiment lacked a non-baited control trap, it provided preliminary evidence that this peridomestic Ae. malayensis population in Singapore may engage in human-biting behavior, as was already observed for other populations of the species in South-East Asia [27,28].

Despite its wide distribution in South-East Asia with records in Laos, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Peninsular Malaysia, the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, and Taiwan [27-30], the mosquito Ae. malayensis has been relatively poorly studied. Recently, however, Ae. malayensis was found prevalent in numerous urban parks of Singapore [14]. Not only were Ae. malayensis eggs collected in the forested areas of the parks but they were also found in some open-air areas frequented by humans [14]. The current study reports that in 2018, the National Vector Surveillance program in Singapore detected the presence of Ae. malayensis in Gravitraps [21] outside the urban parks of the island. Although the majority of Aedes mosquitoes found in public apartment blocks were Ae. aegypti, Ae. malayensis was detected in Gravitraps deployed in high-rise building areas, underlining the potential of this mosquito species to colonize urban habitats. It was recently hypothesized that peridomestic mosquito species, such as Ae. malayensis, which escape vector control measures targeting domestic vector species, may have contributed to the (re-)emergence of arboviruses in Singapore in the last two decades [14]. The well-known peridomestic mosquito Ae. albopictus, which was highly abundant in our human-baited trap survey, significantly increases the risk of arbovirus transmission in Singapore [14]. Control of peridomestic mosquitoes is a challenge because in addition to artificial breeding sites, less accessible natural sites such as tree holes need to be targeted as well [31].

Although we did not measure other parameters that influence the vectorial capacity of a mosquito species, such as adult density and survival, and the duration of the virus extrinsic incubation period [32], vector competence and attraction to humans make Ae. malayensis a potential vector of YFV and other arboviruses that deserves increased attention from public health authorities. The level of Ae. malayensis vector competence for YFV that we observed was in the same range as our Ae. aegypti controls from Laos, and as Brazilian Ae. aegypti that were orally challenged with the same virus isolate in a previous study [33]. It is worth noting, however, that vector competence results cannot be readily compared if they did not use the same oral infectious dose, or if other factors such as virus strain and detection assays were different. The dose-response curves that we generated in the present study will be useful for future comparisons because they provide absolute estimates of vector competence indices, such as the OID50. Moreover, two vector species or populations may have a similar level of vector competence at a given infectious dose, but vary at a different dose. For example, the DENV type 2 susceptibility of two field-derived populations of Ae. aegypti in Thailand were similar at a medium dose, but different at a low dose [34]. This example indicates that the minimal threshold for infection may differ between mosquito populations. Likewise, in the present study, we observed similar YFV OID50 values for Ae. aegypti and Ae. malayensis but Ae. aegypti had a lower YFV OID10 value. In natural conditions, the oral infectious dose is the primary driver of successful human-to-mosquito transmission of arboviruses [35,36].

Despite an efficient vaccine, YFV still remains an important public health concern in Africa and South America. YFV is maintained in sylvatic cycles between non-human primates and arboreal mosquitoes, and human outbreaks occur when the virus is introduced into an urban cycle mediated by Ae. aegypti [37]. Although there is no evidence of a sylvatic cycle of YFV in the Asia-Pacific region, the risk of spillover transmission exists. The lack of YFV outbreaks in the Asia-Pacific region to date could be due to cross-protective immunity conferred by other widespread flaviviruses such as DENV and Japanese encephalitis virus, but it could also reflect relatively fewer opportunities for YFV introduction until now. Rampant globalization now puts the Asia-Pacific region at an unprecedented risk of YFV introduction [6-8]. Billions of immunologically naïve people, together with competent Ae. aegypti populations [38,39], create a dangerous set of conditions that are theoretically favorable to a massive YFV epidemic. On the other hand, a scenario whereby YFV would establish a novel sylvatic cycle [40] seems unlikely in Singapore given the small size of resident non-human primate populations. Clearly, places with high densities of the domestic vector Ae. aegypti are most at risk of spillover transmission, but we emphasize that in the absence of Ae. aegypti, ancillary vectors should not be overlooked. Competent mosquito species such as Ae. malayensis could facilitate introduction of YFV into the Asia-Pacific region. In Singapore, strict and sustained vector control measures have achieved low densities of Ae. aegypti [9] but this has failed to prevent arbovirus outbreaks in the last two decades [10]. Following a previous study on the ability of Ae. malayensis from Singapore to transmit DENV and CHIKV [14], we reiterate the need to account for peridomestic species in the management of mosquito vector populations.

8 Sep 2019

[EXSCINDED]Dear Dr. Lambrechts:

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "A Peridomestic Aedes malayensis Population Increases Risk of Yellow Fever Virus Transmission in Singapore" (PNTD-D-19-01129) for review by PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic but identified some aspects of the manuscript that should be improved.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

In addition, when you are ready to resubmit, please be prepared to provide the following:

(1) A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

(2) Two versions of the manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed (uploaded as a "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted" file ); the other a clean version (uploaded as the article file).

(3) If available, a striking still image (a new image if one is available or an existing one from within your manuscript). If your manuscript is accepted for publication, this image may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel images; where one is available, please use 'add file' at the time of resubmission and select 'striking image' as the file type.

Please provide a short caption, including credits, uploaded as a separate "Other" file. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License at http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/content-license (NOTE: we cannot publish copyrighted images).

(4) Appropriate Figure Files

Please remove all name and figure # text from your figure files upon submitting your revision. Please also take this time to check that your figures are of high resolution, which will improve both the editorial review process and help expedite your manuscript's publication should it be accepted. Please note that figures must have been originally created at 300dpi or higher. Do not manually increase the resolution of your files. For instructions on how to properly obtain high quality images, please review our Figure Guidelines, with examples at: http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/figures

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript by Nov 07 2019 11:59PM. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we ask that you let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

To submit your revised files, please log in to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pntd/

If you have any questions or concerns while you make these revisions, please let us know.

Sincerely,

Elvina Viennet

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

David Harley

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: This study seeks to clarify the degree to which occurrence of Aedes malayensis in Singapore exacerbates the risk of yellow fever virus introduction to that country. The authors conducted a rigorous experimental study of vector competence with an Aedes aegypti control, and a field study to ascertain human attraction. It is the latter that is tripping me up a little, in that no unbaited traps were used to determine the number of Ae. malayensis that might have entered the net in the course of daily movement. Can the authors specify what the "other" mosquitoes captured via this method were? Were any of them species well known to not be attracted to humans?

Reviewer #2: Methods were appropriate and carefully described.

Reviewer #3: For the most part with the vector competence experiments. However, the host-seeking behavior study does not fulfil this criteria. Refer to attached document for full information.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Statistical analyses are rigorous but I would ask that the authors delete text referring to "marginally insignificant" results and remove symbols to denote "P

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: I am somewhat concerned about drawing strong conclusions about human attraction from the field data without an unbaited control; the authors could allay this concern if there are studies in the literature showing a clear difference.

Also, the authors should discuss the capture of a large number of Ae. albopictus in this urban park. This species has also been shown to be competent for YFV and to my mind poses the larger risk here.

Reviewer #2: Conclusions are supported by data, namely that Aedes malayensis is a component vector of yellow fever virus (YFV). YFV infection and dissemination rates in Ae. malayensis and Ae. aegypti were similar.

Reviewer #3: Refer to attached document

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Throughout, including title: Change to "Occurrence of a peridomestic Aedes malayensis population..." It is not the global existence of Ae. malayensis that exacerbates risk in Singapore, it is the occurrence of this species IN Singapore that exacerbates risk there.

Line 30: Higher than what? Clarify

Line 38: Change "a" to "one" and indicate 3 trap days- this was a very limited study and that should be made more clear.

Line 50: move "was" before "Ae. malayensis"

Line 51: move "experimentally" after "to"- infinitives may be split when necessary for clarity!

Summary: reconsider what has actually been demonstrated about human attraction based on comments above

Line 66: delete "largely"

Line 122: Change thereafter to hereafter

Line 177: In future, please provide volunteers with a motorized aspirator to enhance safety

Throughout: the term "insignificant" is not standard; please change to "not significant"

Line 271-272: move "were" to after "only"

Table 1: Please reformat to improve legibility (font is variable and some of it tiny); remove annotation of P

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This study highlights a very important risk factor for the spread of yellow fever into Asia. The experimental analysis of vector competence is very well done. The field study is both small scale and lacks a control-these limitations must be addressed.

Reviewer #2: Arbovirologists, epidemiologists and public health experts have long pondered, “why yellow fever has never appeared in Asia?” Certainly there were multiple opportunities in the past when Chinese explorers sailed to Africa and during the European colonial period when British, French, Dutch and ships of other nations (full of Ae. aegypti) made frequent journeys from Africa and tropical America to southeast Asia, India and the Pacific Islands. But, to our knowledge, yellow fever virus (YFV) never appeared or caused epidemics there, as happened periodically in Europe and the Americas.

Experimental studies have shown that Asian Ae. aegypti are similar to African and New World Ae. aegypti in their susceptibility and vector competence for YFV. Also humans and non-human primates of Asia origin are also susceptible. The most plausible explanation seems to be that most people living in Asia in the past and now have heterologous flavivirus antibodies due to natural or vaccine-induced infection with other flaviviruses like dengue and Japanese encephalitis viruses. Animal studies indicate that hamsters infected previously with JE and other flaviviruses have lower levels of viremia and modest liver pathology, when subsequently infected with YFV.

In this excellent study, the investigators have demonstrated that Ae. malayensis, an anthpophilic mosquito in Singapore, is a competent vector of YFV. Ae. malayensis occurs in some urban habitats that are not currently targeted in Ae. aegypti control programs, and they may contribute to “cryptic” arbovirus (DENV, CHIKV, ZIKV) transmission. But these findings do not increase the risk of YFV transmission in Singapore.

Ae. malayensis was first described in Singapore in 1962 and has subsequently been reported in Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam and Taiwan. It probably occurs throughout southeastern Asia. So it is not a new introduction and has probably been in the region for thousands of years. Given that history and the multiple opportunities for introduction of YFV into the region in the past, is Singapore now at greater risk of a yellow fever outbreak that it was 200 or 400 years ago? If Ae. aegypti populations are maintained at a low level in Singapore, it may actually be at a lower risk, regardless of the presence of Ae. malayensis.

In the opinion of this reviewer, a more appropriate title for this article would be something like this:

“Aedes malayensis, a peridomestic mosquito in Singapore, is a competent vector of yellow fever virus.” In the discussion, the authors could speculate that this finding might facilitate the introduction of YFV into Singapore or other countries in the region where Ae. malayensis occurs.

Reviewer #3: Refer to attached document

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Submitted filename: YFV Ae. malayensis Singapore final.docx

Click here for additional data file.

12 Sep 2019

Submitted filename: Miot_response_to_reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

15 Sep 2019

Dear Dr. Lambrechts,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript, "A peridomestic Aedes malayensis population in Singapore can transmit yellow fever virus", has been editorially accepted for publication at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please note: your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes.

IMPORTANT NOTES

* Copyediting and Author Proofs: To ensure prompt publication, your manuscript will NOT be subject to detailed copyediting and you will NOT receive a typeset proof for review. The corresponding author will have one final opportunity to correct any errors when sent the requests mentioned above. Please review this version of your manuscript for any errors.

* If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team in advance at plosntds@plos.org. If you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, you must coordinate with our press team, and your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. PLOS NTDs may choose to issue a press release for your article. If there is anything that the journal should know, please get in touch.

*Now that your manuscript has been provisionally accepted, please log into EM and update your profile. Go to http://www.editorialmanager.com/pntd, log in, and click on the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page. Please update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process.

*Note to LaTeX users only - Our staff will ask you to upload a TEX file in addition to the PDF before the paper can be sent to typesetting, so please carefully review our Latex Guidelines [http://www.plosntds.org/static/latexGuidelines.action] in the meantime.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Elvina Viennet

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

David Harley

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

27 Sep 2019

Dear Dr. Lambrechts,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "A peridomestic Aedes malayensis population in Singapore can transmit yellow fever virus," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Serap Aksoy

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Shaden Kamhawi

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases