Literature DB >> 31589465

Risk Factors for Loss to Follow-up in 3202 Patients at 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Implications for Identifying Health Disparities in the MOON Prospective Cohort Study.

Prem N Ramkumar1, Muhammad B Tariq1, Annunziato Amendola1, Jack T Andrish1, Robert H Brophy1, Warren R Dunn1, David C Flanigan1, Laura J Huston1, Morgan H Jones1, Christopher C Kaeding1, Michael W Kattan1, Robert G Marx1, Matthew J Matava1, Eric C McCarty1, Richard D Parker1, Armando F Vidal1, Michelle L Wolcott1, Brian R Wolf1, Rick W Wright1, Kurt P Spindler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the risk factors for loss to follow-up in prospective clinical studies may allow for a targeted approach to minimizing follow-up bias and improving the generalizability of conclusions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and other sports-related interventions.
PURPOSE: To identify independent risk factors associated with failure to complete (ie, loss to follow-up) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 2 years after ACLR within a well-funded prospective longitudinal cohort. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: All patients undergoing primary or revision ACLR enrolled in the prospectively collected database of the multicenter consortium between 2002 and 2008 were included. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine which baseline risk factors were significantly associated with loss to follow-up at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Predictors assessed for loss to follow-up were as follows: consortium site, sex, race, marital status, smoking status, phone number provided (home or cell), email address provided (primary or secondary), years of school completed, average hours worked per week, working status (full-time, part-time, homemaker, retired, student, or disabled), number of people living at home, and preoperative PROMs (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Marx Activity Rating Scale, and International Knee Documentation Committee).
RESULTS: A total of 3202 patients who underwent ACLR were enrolled. The 2-year PROM follow-up rate for this cohort was 88% (2821 of 3202). Multivariate analyses showed that patient sex (male: odds ratio [OR], 1.80) and race (black: OR, 3.64; other nonwhite: OR, 1.81) were independent predictors of 2-year loss to follow-up of PROMs. Education level was a nonconfounder.
CONCLUSION: While education level did not predict loss to follow-up, patients who are male and nonwhite are at increased risk of loss to follow-up of PROM at 2 years. Capturing patient outcomes with minimal loss depends on equitable, not equal, opportunity to maximize generalizability and mitigate potential population-level health disparities. REGISTRATION: NCT00478894 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; follow-up; health disparities; risk factors

Year:  2019        PMID: 31589465      PMCID: PMC7269366          DOI: 10.1177/0363546519876925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  21 in total

1.  What is value in health care?

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Andy Judge; Nigel K Arden; Cyrus Cooper; M Kassim Javaid; Andrew J Carr; Richard E Field; Paul A Dieppe
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  B M Norquist; B A Goldberg; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; A F Anderson; A L Boland; C D Harner; M Kurosaka; P Neyret; J C Richmond; K D Shelborne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure.

Authors:  E M Roos; H P Roos; L S Lohmander; C Ekdahl; B D Beynnon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Barriers to completion of Patient Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schamber; Steven K Takemoto; Kate Eresian Chenok; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Open mHealth Architecture: A Primer for Tomorrow's Orthopedic Surgeon and Introduction to Its Use in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prem N Ramkumar; George F Muschler; Kurt P Spindler; Joshua D Harris; Patrick C McCulloch; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Factors associated with non-response in routine use of patient reported outcome measures after elective surgery in England.

Authors:  Andrew Hutchings; Jenny Neuburger; Kirstin Grosse Frie; Nick Black; Jan van der Meulen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions in primary care: a cohort survey.

Authors:  Michele Peters; Helen Crocker; Crispin Jenkinson; Helen Doll; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Eric Bohm; Patricia Franklin; Stephen Lyman; Geke Denissen; Jill Dawson; Jennifer Dunn; Kate Eresian Chenok; Michael Dunbar; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  4 in total

1.  MOON's Strategy for Obtaining Over Eighty Percent Follow-up at 10 Years Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Isabel A Wolfe; Brooke E Turner; Laura J Huston; Caroline E Taber; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The Forward Movement: Amplifying Black Voices on Race and Orthopaedics-It's Time to Talk about Race in Sports Medicine.

Authors:  Kwadwo Owusu-Akyaw
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Development of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Being Lost to Follow-up After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Robert A Burnett; Elaine K Lee; Jonathan P Rasio; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-09-22

Review 4.  Disparities in ACL Reconstruction: the Influence of Gender and Race on Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Sai K Devana; Carlos Solorzano; Benedict Nwachukwu; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.