Literature DB >> 31588557

Male breast cancer in the United States: Treatment patterns and prognostic factors in the 21st century.

Siddhartha Yadav1, Dhauna Karam2, Irbaz Bin Riaz1, Hao Xie1, Urshila Durani1, Narjust Duma1, Karthik V Giridhar1, Tina J Hieken3, Judy C Boughey3, Robert W Mutter4, John R Hawse5, Rafael E Jimenez6, Fergus J Couch6, Roberto A Leon-Ferre1, Kathryn J Ruddy1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease for which there is limited understanding of treatment patterns and prognostic factors.
METHODS: Men with TNM stage I to stage III breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 in the National Cancer Data Base were included. Trends in treatment modalities were described using the average annual percentage change (AAPC) and estimated using Joinpoint software for the analysis of trends. Kaplan-Meier curves and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to compare survival between subgroups and to identify prognostic factors.
RESULTS: A total of 10,873 MBC cases were included, with a median age at diagnosis of 64 years. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 24% of patients, and 70% of patients undergoing breast conservation received radiotherapy. Approximately 44% of patients received chemotherapy, and 62% of patients with estrogen receptor-positive disease received endocrine therapy. Oncotype DX was ordered in 35% of patients with lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors. During the study period, there was a significant increase in the rates of total mastectomy, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, radiotherapy after breast conservation, ordering of Oncotype DX, and the use of endocrine therapy (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, factors found to be associated with worse overall survival were older age, black race, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, high tumor grade and stage of disease, and undergoing total mastectomy. Residing in a higher income area; having progesterone receptor-positive tumors; and receipt of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy were associated with better overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of prospective randomized trials in patients with MBC, the results of the current study demonstrated that the treatment of this disease has evolved over the years. These findings further the understanding of the modern treatment and prognosis of MBC, and identify several areas for further research.
© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  male; male breast cancer; pattern; survival; treatment; trend

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31588557      PMCID: PMC7668385          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  52 in total

1.  Adjuvant systemic therapy for male breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Sharon H Giordano; George H Perkins; Kristine Broglio; Sherry G Garcia; Lavinia P Middleton; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Racial disparities in treatment and survival of women with stage I-III breast cancer at a large academic medical center in metropolitan Detroit.

Authors:  Wei Du; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Underascertainment of radiotherapy receipt in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Paul Abrahamse; Sarah T Hawley; John J Graff; Ann S Hamilton; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The Genomic Landscape of Male Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Salvatore Piscuoglio; Charlotte K Y Ng; Melissa P Murray; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Luciano G Martelotto; Felipe C Geyer; Francois-Clement Bidard; Samuel Berman; Nicola Fusco; Rita A Sakr; Carey A Eberle; Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Gabriel S Macedo; Muzaffar Akram; Timour Baslan; James B Hicks; Tari A King; Edi Brogi; Larry Norton; Britta Weigelt; Clifford A Hudis; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Edward H Romond; Edith A Perez; John Bryant; Vera J Suman; Charles E Geyer; Nancy E Davidson; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Silvana Martino; Soonmyung Paik; Peter A Kaufman; Sandra M Swain; Thomas M Pisansky; Louis Fehrenbacher; Leila A Kutteh; Victor G Vogel; Daniel W Visscher; Greg Yothers; Robert B Jenkins; Ann M Brown; Shaker R Dakhil; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Wilma L Lingle; Pamela M Klein; James N Ingle; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients.

Authors:  Kandace P McGuire; Alfredo A Santillan; Paramjeet Kaur; Tammi Meade; Jateen Parbhoo; Morgan Mathias; Corinne Shamehdi; Michelle Davis; Daniel Ramos; Charles E Cox
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343.

Authors:  Kevin S Hughes; Lauren A Schnaper; Jennifer R Bellon; Constance T Cirrincione; Donald A Berry; Beryl McCormick; Hyman B Muss; Barbara L Smith; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer; William C Wood
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Breast conservation for male breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; Jennifer Rusby; Francisco Dominguez; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Management of male breast cancer in the United States: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis.

Authors:  Emma C Fields; Peter DeWitt; Christine M Fisher; Rachel Rabinovitch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Prognostic impact of comorbidity among long-term breast cancer survivors: results from the LACE study.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Dan H Moore; William A Satariano; Marilyn L Kwan; Robert A Hiatt; Candyce Kroenke; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  An updated review of epidemiology, risk factors, and management of male breast cancer.

Authors:  Noman Ahmed Jang Khan; Maria Tirona
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between men and women with breast cancer: a retrospective study using nationwide inpatient data in Japan.

Authors:  Takaaki Konishi; Michimasa Fujiogi; Nobuaki Michihata; Kojiro Morita; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Masahiko Tanabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Ribociclib plus letrozole in male patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the phase IIIb CompLEEment-1 trial.

Authors:  Mario Campone; Michelino De Laurentiis; Claudio Zamagni; Igor Kudryavcev; Mariëtte Agterof; Ursa Brown-Glaberman; Markéta Palácová; Sanjoy Chatterjee; Lakshmi Menon-Singh; Jiwen Wu; Miguel Martín
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and black race: does sex matter?

Authors:  Mariam F Eskander; Yaming Li; Oindrila Bhattacharyya; Allan Tsung; Bridget A Oppong; Ahmad Hamad; Margaret Gatti-Mays; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.624

5.  Poor prognosis of male triple-positive breast Cancer patients: a propensity score matched SEER analysis and molecular portraits.

Authors:  Biyuan Wang; Hui Wang; Andi Zhao; Mi Zhang; Jin Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Utility of Oncotype DX in Male Breast Cancer Patients and Impact on Chemotherapy Administration: A Comparative Study with Female Patients.

Authors:  Austin D Williams; Christopher M McGreevy; Julia C Tchou; Lucy M De La Cruz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Male Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Elimimian; Leah Elson; Hong Li; Hong Liang; Nadeem Bilani; Emily C Zabor; Abby Statler; Zeina Nahleh
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.400

8.  Genetic testing results in Slovenian male breast cancer cohort indicate the BRCA2 7806-2A > G founder variant could be associated with higher male breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Ksenija Strojnik; Mateja Krajc; Vita Setrajcic Dragos; Vida Stegel; Srdjan Novakovic; Ana Blatnik
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Male breast cancer: clinicopathological characterization of a National Danish cohort 1980-2009.

Authors:  Anne Marie Bak Jylling; Vibeke Jensen; Giedrius Lelkaitis; Peer Christiansen; Sarah Schulz Nielsen; Marianne Djernes Lautrup
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.239

10.  Reported Signs, Symptoms, and Diagnostic Tests Before Cardiotoxicity Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mina Attin; Karen Reifenstein; Sakshi Mehta; Kimberly Arcoleo; C D Lin; Eugene Storozynsky
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.