Literature DB >> 20186956

Neuroplasticity predicts outcome of optic neuritis independent of tissue damage.

Thomas M Jenkins1, Ahmed T Toosy, Olga Ciccarelli, Katherine A Miszkiel, Claudia A Wheeler-Kingshott, Andrew P Henderson, Constantinos Kallis, Laura Mancini, Gordon T Plant, David H Miller, Alan J Thompson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether lateral occipital complex (LOC) activation with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) predicts visual outcome after clinically isolated optic neuritis (ON). To investigate the reasons behind good recovery following ON, despite residual optic nerve demyelination and neuroaxonal damage.
METHODS: Patients with acute ON and healthy volunteers were studied longitudinally over 12 months. Structural MRI, visual evoked potentials (VEPs), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were used to quantify acute inflammation, demyelination, conduction block, and later to estimate remyelination and neuroaxonal loss over the entire visual pathway. The role of neuroplasticity was investigated using fMRI. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to study associations between vision, structure, and function.
RESULTS: Greater baseline fMRI responses in the LOCs were associated with better visual outcome at 12 months. This was evident on stimulation of either eye (p = 0.007 affected; p = 0.020 fellow eye), and was independent of measures of demyelination and neuroaxonal loss. A negative fMRI response in the LOCs at baseline was associated with a relatively worse visual outcome. No acute electrophysiological or structural measures, in the anterior or posterior visual pathways, were associated with visual outcome.
INTERPRETATION: Early neuroplasticity in higher visual areas appears to be an important determinant of recovery from ON, independent of tissue damage in the anterior or posterior visual pathway, including neuroaxonal loss (as measured by MRI, VEP, and OCT) and demyelination (as measured by VEP).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186956     DOI: 10.1002/ana.21823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  25 in total

1.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Han Cheng; Ying-Sheng Hu; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Longitudinal evidence for anterograde trans-synaptic degeneration after optic neuritis.

Authors:  Carmen Tur; Olivia Goodkin; Daniel R Altmann; Thomas M Jenkins; Katherine Miszkiel; Alessia Mirigliani; Camilla Fini; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli; Ahmed T Toosy
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  New developments in the treatment of optic neuritis.

Authors:  Thomas M Jenkins; Ahmed T Toosy
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2010-06-17

4.  Radiomic analysis of the optic nerve at the first episode of acute optic neuritis: an indicator of optic nerve pathology and a predictor of visual recovery?

Authors:  Michaela Cellina; Marta Pirovano; Matteo Ciocca; Daniele Gibelli; Chiara Floridi; Giancarlo Oliva
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  MRI of acute optic neuritis (ON) at the first episode: Can we predict the visual outcome and the development of multiple sclerosis (MS)?

Authors:  Michaela Cellina; Chiara Floridi; Cristina Rosti; Marcello Orsi; Marta Panzeri; Marta Pirovano; Matteo Ciocca; Giancarlo Oliva; Daniele Gibelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Interleukin-1β promotes long-term potentiation in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Francesco Mori; Robert Nisticò; Georgia Mandolesi; Sonia Piccinin; Dalila Mango; Hajime Kusayanagi; Nicola Berretta; Alessandra Bergami; Antonietta Gentile; Alessandra Musella; Carolina G Nicoletti; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Fabio Buttari; Nicola B Mercuri; Gianvito Martino; Roberto Furlan; Diego Centonze
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 7.  Visual Cortex Plasticity Following Peripheral Damage To The Visual System: fMRI Evidence.

Authors:  João Lemos; Daniela Pereira; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 8.  Neuroplasticity and functional recovery in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Valentina Tomassini; Paul M Matthews; Alan J Thompson; Daniel Fuglø; Jeroen J Geurts; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Derek K Jones; Maria A Rocca; Richard G Wise; Frederik Barkhof; Jacqueline Palace
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Age-dependent favorable visual recovery despite significant retinal atrophy in pediatric MOGAD: how much retina do you really need to see well?

Authors:  Joachim Havla; Thivya Pakeerathan; Kevin Rostasy; Ilya Ayzenberg; Carolin Schwake; Jeffrey L Bennett; Ingo Kleiter; Ana Felipe-Rucián; Stephanie C Joachim; Amelie S Lotz-Havla; Tania Kümpfel; Markus Krumbholz; Eva M Wendel; Markus Reindl; Charlotte Thiels; Thomas Lücke; Kerstin Hellwig; Ralf Gold
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 8.322

10.  Efficacy of vision restoration therapy after optic neuritis (VISION study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Johann Schinzel; Lina Schwarzlose; Holger Dietze; Karolina Bartusch; Susanne Weiss; Stephanie Ohlraun; Friedemann Paul; Jan Dörr
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.