Literature DB >> 31587565

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.

Andrew R Chapman1, Philip D Adamson1,2, Anoop S V Shah1, Atul Anand1, Fiona E Strachan1, Amy V Ferry1, Kuan Ken Lee1, Colin Berry3, Iain Findlay4, Anne Cruikshank5, Alan Reid5, Alasdair Gray6, Paul O Collinson7, Fred Apple8, David A McAllister9, Donogh Maguire10, Keith A A Fox1, Catalina A Vallejos11,12, Catriona Keerie13,14, Christopher J Weir13,14, David E Newby1, Nicholas L Mills1,14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of more sensitive cardiac troponin assays has led to increased recognition of myocardial injury in acute illnesses other than acute coronary syndrome. The Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction recommends high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing and classification of patients with myocardial injury based on pathogenesis, but the clinical implications of implementing this guideline are not well understood.
METHODS: In a stepped-wedge cluster randomized, controlled trial, we implemented a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay and the recommendations of the Universal Definition in 48 282 consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. In a prespecified secondary analysis, we compared the primary outcome of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death and secondary outcome of noncardiovascular death at 1 year across diagnostic categories.
RESULTS: Implementation increased the diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction by 11% (510/4471), type 2 myocardial infarction by 22% (205/916), and acute and chronic myocardial injury by 36% (443/1233) and 43% (389/898), respectively. Compared with those without myocardial injury, the rate of the primary outcome was highest in those with type 1 myocardial infarction (cause-specific hazard ratio [HR] 5.64 [95% CI, 5.12-6.22]), but was similar across diagnostic categories, whereas noncardiovascular deaths were highest in those with acute myocardial injury (cause specific HR 2.65 [95% CI, 2.33-3.01]). Despite modest increases in antiplatelet therapy and coronary revascularization after implementation in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, the primary outcome was unchanged (cause specific HR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.82-1.21]). Increased recognition of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury did not lead to changes in investigation, treatment or outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and the recommendations of the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction identified patients at high-risk of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events but was not associated with consistent increases in treatment or improved outcomes. Trials of secondary prevention are urgently required to determine whether this risk is modifiable in patients without type 1 myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01852123.

Entities:  

Keywords:  myocardial infarction; troponin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31587565      PMCID: PMC6970546          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  31 in total

1.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Hugo A Katus; Fred S Apple; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Bernard A Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Robert O Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasché; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michael Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Clinical Laboratory Practice Recommendations for the Use of Cardiac Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Expert Opinion from the Academy of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and the Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

Authors:  Alan H B Wu; Robert H Christenson; Dina N Greene; Allan S Jaffe; Peter A Kavsak; Jordi Ordonez-Llanos; Fred S Apple
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Incident Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Cohort of Patients Undergoing Coronary or Peripheral Arterial Angiography.

Authors:  Hanna K Gaggin; Yuyin Liu; Asya Lyass; Roland R J van Kimmenade; Shweta R Motiwala; Noreen P Kelly; Aditi Mallick; Parul U Gandhi; Nasrien E Ibrahim; Mandy L Simon; Anju Bhardwaj; Arianna M Belcher; Jamie E Harisiades; Joseph M Massaro; Ralph B D'Agostino; James L Januzzi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology/World Heart Federation universal definition of myocardial infarction classification system and the risk of cardiovascular death: observations from the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38).

Authors:  Marc P Bonaca; Stephen D Wiviott; Eugene Braunwald; Sabina A Murphy; Christian T Ruff; Elliott M Antman; David A Morrow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The appropriateness of coronary investigation in myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction (ACT-2): A randomized trial design.

Authors:  Kristina Lambrakis; John K French; Ian A Scott; Tom Briffa; David Brieger; Michael E Farkouh; Harvey White; Anthony Ming-Yu Chuang; Kathryn Tiver; Stephen Quinn; Billingsley Kaambwa; Matthew Horsfall; Erin Morton; Derek P Chew
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Effect of Definition on Incidence and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Thomas Nestelberger; Jasper Boeddinghaus; Patrick Badertscher; Raphael Twerenbold; Karin Wildi; Dominik Breitenbücher; Zaid Sabti; Christian Puelacher; Maria Rubini Giménez; Nikola Kozhuharov; Ivo Strebel; Lorraine Sazgary; Deborah Schneider; Janina Jann; Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz; Òscar Miró; F Javier Martin-Sanchez; Beata Morawiec; Damian Kawecki; Piotr Muzyk; Dagmar I Keller; Nicolas Geigy; Stefan Osswald; Tobias Reichlin; Christian Mueller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Treatment and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury compared with type 1 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Pritha Subramanyam; Eugenia Gianos; Harmony R Reynolds; Binita Shah; Steven P Sedlis
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.439

8.  Sensitive troponin assay and the classification of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Anoop S V Shah; David A McAllister; Rosamund Mills; Kuan Ken Lee; Antonia M D Churchhouse; Kathryn M Fleming; Elizabeth Layden; Atul Anand; Omar Fersia; Nikhil V Joshi; Simon Walker; Allan S Jaffe; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Acute Nonischemic Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Andrew P DeFilippis; Andrew R Chapman; Nicholas L Mills; James A de Lemos; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; L Kristin Newby; David A Morrow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Patient selection for high sensitivity cardiac troponin testing and diagnosis of myocardial infarction: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anoop S V Shah; Yader Sandoval; Ala Noaman; Anne Sexter; Amar Vaswani; Stephen W Smith; Mathew Gibbins; Megan Griffiths; Andrew R Chapman; Fiona E Strachan; Atul Anand; Martin A Denvir; Philip D Adamson; Michelle S D'Souza; Alasdair J Gray; David A McAllister; David E Newby; Fred S Apple; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-11-07
View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Evolving Approaches to Diagnosis and Risk-Stratification.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Yader Sandoval
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Blood and imaging biomarkers in type 2 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Bertil Lindahl; Nicholas L Mills; Christian Mueller
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2022-03-16

Review 3.  2021 Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes for the Perioperative Clinician.

Authors:  Katherine J Kunkel; Alejandro Lemor; Shazil Mahmood; Pedro Villablanca; Harish Ramakrishna
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Influence of Age on the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Matthew T H Lowry; Dimitrios Doudesis; Ryan Wereski; Dorien M Kimenai; Christopher Tuck; Amy V Ferry; Anda Bularga; Caelan Taggart; Kuan K Lee; Andrew R Chapman; Anoop S V Shah; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills; Atul Anand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 39.918

5.  Assessment of Oxygen Supply-Demand Imbalance and Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the High-STEACS Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anda Bularga; Caelan Taggart; Filip Mendusic; Dorien M Kimenai; Ryan Wereski; Matthew T H Lowry; Kuan K Lee; Amy V Ferry; Stacey S Stewart; David A McAllister; Anoop S V Shah; Atul Anand; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills; Andrew R Chapman
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 6.  Cardiovascular Biomarkers and Imaging in Older Adults: JACC Council Perspectives.

Authors:  Daniel E Forman; James A de Lemos; Leslee J Shaw; David B Reuben; Radmila Lyubarova; Eric D Peterson; John A Spertus; Susan Zieman; Marcel E Salive; Michael W Rich
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin on Presentation to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Atul Anand; Kuan Ken Lee; Andrew R Chapman; Amy V Ferry; Phil D Adamson; Fiona E Strachan; Colin Berry; Iain Findlay; Anne Cruikshank; Alan Reid; Paul O Collinson; Fred S Apple; David A McAllister; Donogh Maguire; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby; Chris Tuck; Ronald Harkess; Catriona Keerie; Christopher J Weir; Richard A Parker; Alasdair Gray; Anoop S V Shah; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 39.918

8.  Clinical characteristics and outcome of elderly patients admitted in emergency department with an oxygen mismatch and type 2 myocardial infarction or myocardial injury.

Authors:  Laurent Jacquin; Nathan Mewton; Stéphanie Bosne; Adrien Mantout; Cyrille Bergerot; Karim Tazarourte; Marion Douplat
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 9.  Diagnosis, Investigation and Management of Patients with Acute and Chronic Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Caelan Taggart; Ryan Wereski; Nicholas L Mills; Andrew R Chapman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Performance of the GRACE 2.0 score in patients with type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  John Hung; Andreas Roos; Erik Kadesjö; David A McAllister; Dorien M Kimenai; Anoop S V Shah; Atul Anand; Fiona E Strachan; Keith A A Fox; Nicholas L Mills; Andrew R Chapman; Martin J Holzmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 35.855

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.