BACKGROUND: The 99th centile of cardiac troponin, derived from a healthy reference population, is recommended as the diagnostic threshold for myocardial infarction, but troponin concentrations are strongly influenced by age. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of cardiac troponin in older patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a multicenter trial of consecutive patients with suspected myocardial infarction, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation for the diagnosis of type 1, type 2, or type 4b myocardial infarction across 3 age groups (<50, 50-74, and ≥75 years) using guideline-recommended sex-specific and age-adjusted 99th centile thresholds. RESULTS: In 46 435 consecutive patients aged 18 to 108 years (mean, 61±17 years), 5216 (11%) had a diagnosis of myocardial infarction. In patients <50 (n=12 379), 50 to 74 (n=22 380), and ≥75 (n=11 676) years, the sensitivity of the guideline-recommended threshold was similar at 79.2% (95% CI, 75.5-82.9), 80.6% (95% CI, 79.2-82.1), and 81.6% (95% CI, 79.8-83.2), respectively. The specificity decreased with advancing age from 98.3% (95% CI, 98.1-98.5) to 95.5% (95% CI, 95.2-95.8), and 82.6% (95% CI, 81.9-83.4). The use of age-adjusted 99th centile thresholds improved the specificity (91.3% [90.8%-91.9%] versus 82.6% [95% CI, 81.9%-83.4%]) and positive predictive value (59.3% [57.0%-61.5%] versus 51.5% [49.9%-53.3%]) for myocardial infarction in patients ≥75 years but failed to prevent the decrease in either parameter with increasing age and resulted in a marked reduction in sensitivity compared with the use of the guideline-recommended threshold (55.9% [53.6%-57.9%] versus 81.6% [79.8%-83.3%]. CONCLUSIONS: Age alters the diagnostic performance of cardiac troponin, with reduced specificity and positive predictive value in older patients when applying the guideline-recommended or age-adjusted 99th centiles. Individualized diagnostic approaches rather than the adjustment of binary thresholds are needed in an aging population.
BACKGROUND: The 99th centile of cardiac troponin, derived from a healthy reference population, is recommended as the diagnostic threshold for myocardial infarction, but troponin concentrations are strongly influenced by age. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of cardiac troponin in older patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a multicenter trial of consecutive patients with suspected myocardial infarction, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation for the diagnosis of type 1, type 2, or type 4b myocardial infarction across 3 age groups (<50, 50-74, and ≥75 years) using guideline-recommended sex-specific and age-adjusted 99th centile thresholds. RESULTS: In 46 435 consecutive patients aged 18 to 108 years (mean, 61±17 years), 5216 (11%) had a diagnosis of myocardial infarction. In patients <50 (n=12 379), 50 to 74 (n=22 380), and ≥75 (n=11 676) years, the sensitivity of the guideline-recommended threshold was similar at 79.2% (95% CI, 75.5-82.9), 80.6% (95% CI, 79.2-82.1), and 81.6% (95% CI, 79.8-83.2), respectively. The specificity decreased with advancing age from 98.3% (95% CI, 98.1-98.5) to 95.5% (95% CI, 95.2-95.8), and 82.6% (95% CI, 81.9-83.4). The use of age-adjusted 99th centile thresholds improved the specificity (91.3% [90.8%-91.9%] versus 82.6% [95% CI, 81.9%-83.4%]) and positive predictive value (59.3% [57.0%-61.5%] versus 51.5% [49.9%-53.3%]) for myocardial infarction in patients ≥75 years but failed to prevent the decrease in either parameter with increasing age and resulted in a marked reduction in sensitivity compared with the use of the guideline-recommended threshold (55.9% [53.6%-57.9%] versus 81.6% [79.8%-83.3%]. CONCLUSIONS: Age alters the diagnostic performance of cardiac troponin, with reduced specificity and positive predictive value in older patients when applying the guideline-recommended or age-adjusted 99th centiles. Individualized diagnostic approaches rather than the adjustment of binary thresholds are needed in an aging population.
Authors: Dina Melki; Johan Lugnegård; Joakim Alfredsson; Suzanne Lind; Kai M Eggers; Bertil Lindahl; Tomas Jernberg Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ezra A Amsterdam; Nanette K Wenger; Ralph G Brindis; Donald E Casey; Theodore G Ganiats; David R Holmes; Allan S Jaffe; Hani Jneid; Rosemary F Kelly; Michael C Kontos; Glenn N Levine; Philip R Liebson; Debabrata Mukherjee; Eric D Peterson; Marc S Sabatine; Richard W Smalling; Susan J Zieman Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Yu Horiuchi; Nicholas Wettersten; Mitul P Patel; Christian Mueller; Sean-Xavier Neath; Robert H Christenson; Nils G Morgenthaler; James McCord; Richard M Nowak; Gary M Vilke; Lori B Daniels; Judd E Hollander; Fred S Apple; Chad M Cannon; John T Nagurney; Donald Schreiber; Christopher deFilippi; Christopher Hogan; Deborah B Diercks; Gary Headden; Alexander T Limkakeng; Inder Anand; Alan H B Wu; Stefan Ebmeyer; Allan S Jaffe; W Frank Peacock; Alan Maisel Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard R Chaitman; Jeroen J Bax; David A Morrow; Harvey D White Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Jean-Philippe Collet; Holger Thiele; Emanuele Barbato; Olivier Barthélémy; Johann Bauersachs; Deepak L Bhatt; Paul Dendale; Maria Dorobantu; Thor Edvardsen; Thierry Folliguet; Chris P Gale; Martine Gilard; Alexander Jobs; Peter Jüni; Ekaterini Lambrinou; Basil S Lewis; Julinda Mehilli; Emanuele Meliga; Béla Merkely; Christian Mueller; Marco Roffi; Frans H Rutten; Dirk Sibbing; George C M Siontis Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Atul Anand; Kuan Ken Lee; Andrew R Chapman; Amy V Ferry; Phil D Adamson; Fiona E Strachan; Colin Berry; Iain Findlay; Anne Cruikshank; Alan Reid; Paul O Collinson; Fred S Apple; David A McAllister; Donogh Maguire; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby; Chris Tuck; Ronald Harkess; Catriona Keerie; Christopher J Weir; Richard A Parker; Alasdair Gray; Anoop S V Shah; Nicholas L Mills Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: Matthias Mueller-Hennessen; Bertil Lindahl; Evangelos Giannitsis; Moritz Biener; Mehrshad Vafaie; Christopher R deFilippi; Michael Christ; Miguel Santalo-Bel; Mauro Panteghini; Mario Plebani; Franck Verschuren; Tomas Jernberg; John K French; Robert H Christenson; Richard Body; James McCord; Peter Dilba; Hugo A Katus; Christian Mueller Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Andrew R Chapman; Anoop S V Shah; Kuan Ken Lee; Atul Anand; Oliver Francis; Philip Adamson; David A McAllister; Fiona E Strachan; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ryan Wereski; Dorien M Kimenai; Caelan Taggart; Dimitrios Doudesis; Kuan Ken Lee; Matthew T H Lowry; Anda Bularga; David J Lowe; Takeshi Fujisawa; Fred S Apple; Paul O Collinson; Atul Anand; Andrew R Chapman; Nicholas L Mills Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 29.690