Literature DB >> 31586938

Contribution of primary care organisation and specialist care provider to variation in GP referrals for suspected cancer: ecological analysis of national data.

Christopher Burton1, Luke O'Neill2, Phillip Oliver2, Peter Murchie3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine how much of the variation between general practices in referral rates and cancer detection rates is attributable to local health services rather than the practices or their populations.
DESIGN: Ecological analysis of national data on fast-track referrals for suspected cancer from general practices. Data were analysed at the levels of general practice, primary care organisation (Clinical Commissioning Group) and secondary care provider (Acute Hospital Trust) level. Analysis of variation in detection rate was by multilevel linear and Poisson regression.
SETTING: 6379 group practices with data relating to more than 50 cancer cases diagnosed over the 5 years from 2013 to 2017. OUTCOMES: Proportion of observed variation attributable to primary and secondary care organisations in standardised fast-track referral rate and in cancer detection rate before and after adjustment for practice characteristics.
RESULTS: Primary care organisation accounted for 21% of the variation between general practices in the standardised fast-track referral rate and 42% of the unadjusted variation in cancer detection rate. After adjusting for standardised fast-track referral rate, primary care organisation accounted for 31% of the variation in cancer detection rate (compared with 18% accounted for by practice characteristics). In areas where a hospital trust was the main provider for multiple primary care organisations, hospital trusts accounted for the majority of the variation attributable to local health services (between 63% and 69%).
CONCLUSION: This is the first large-scale finding that a substantial proportion of the variation between general practitioner practices in referrals is attributable to their local healthcare systems. Efforts to reduce variation need to focus not just on individual practices but on local diagnostic service provision and culture at the interface of primary and secondary care. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; General Practice; Multi-level modelling; Primary Care; Referral; Variation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31586938     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  8 in total

1.  Are deprivation-specific cancer survival patterns similar according to individual-based and area-based measures? A cohort study of patients diagnosed with five malignancies in England and Wales, 2008-2016.

Authors:  Laura M Woods; Aurélien Belot; Iain M Atherton; Lucy Ellis-Brookes; Matthew Baker; Fiona C Ingleby
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Using cancer risk algorithms to improve risk estimates and referral decisions.

Authors:  Olga Kostopoulou; Kavleen Arora; Bence Pálfi
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-10

3.  Disentangling the Relationship between Physician and Organizational Performance: A Signal Detection Approach.

Authors:  Olga Kostopoulou; Martine Nurek; Brendan C Delaney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas Round; Carolynn Gildea; Mark Ashworth; Henrik Møller
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Role of primary care physician factors on diagnostic testing and referral decisions for symptoms of possible cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Victoria Hardy; Adelaide Yue; Stephanie Archer; Samuel William David Merriel; Matthew Thompson; Jon Emery; Juliet Usher-Smith; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Concordance with urgent referral guidelines in patients presenting with any of six 'alarm' features of possible cancer: a retrospective cohort study using linked primary care records.

Authors:  Bianca Wiering; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Willie Hamilton; John Campbell; Gary Abel
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 7.418

7.  Role of practices and Clinical Commissioning Groups in measures of patient experience: analysis of routine data.

Authors:  Mayam Gomez-Cano; Emily Fletcher; John L Campbell; Marc Elliott; Jenni Burt; Gary Abel
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway-Can the NHS do better? Semi-structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Anna Haste; Mark Lambert; Linda Sharp; Richard Thomson; Sarah Sowden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.377

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.