Literature DB >> 3158658

Influence of neighboring bases on DNA polymerase insertion and proofreading fidelity.

J Petruska, M F Goodman.   

Abstract

We propose a model to describe the frequencies of site-specific base substitution errors by DNA polymerase. In the model, nucleotide misinsertion frequencies are determined by 5'-nearest-neighbor base stacking and 3'-exonucleolytic proofreading efficiencies are governed by the relative proportions of G . C base pairs in the region surrounding the misinserted nucleotide. The model is used to analyze the frequency of replacing dAMP by 2-aminopurine deoxyribonucleotide with purified bacteriophage T4 L141 antimutator DNA polymerase at 57 sites on phi X174 DNA (Pless, R. C., and Bessman, M.J. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 4905-4915). A linear least-squares fit yields a correlation coefficient of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 2.8% between predicted and observed results. Four to five base pairs on each side of the 2-aminopurine incorporation site, approximately one double-helical turn, are found to exert a maximal influence on proofreading. Thermal melting data on native and synthetic DNA are used to deduce base-stacking energies for nearest-neighbor doublets including those involving 2-aminopurine. The inclusion of base-stacking energies in the model calculations leads to predictions similar to those based on the use of empirical parameters for individual base pairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3158658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  34 in total

1.  Template nucleotide moieties required for de novo initiation of RNA synthesis by a recombinant viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.

Authors:  M J Kim; W Zhong; Z Hong; C C Kao
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Expression of error-prone polymerases in BL2 cells activated for Ig somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  V Poltoratsky; C J Woo; B Tippin; A Martin; M F Goodman; M D Scharff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effects of nucleotides on MutS-DNA binding kinetics clarify the role of MutS ATPase activity in mismatch repair.

Authors:  Emily Jacobs-Palmer; Manju M Hingorani
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Estimation of DNA sequence context-dependent mutation rates using primate genomic sequences.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Gerard G Bouffard; Susan S Wallace; Jeffrey P Bond
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Bifacial nucleoside as a surrogate for both T and A in duplex DNA.

Authors:  Dongwon Shin; Yitzhak Tor
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Proofreading dynamics of a processive DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Borja Ibarra; Yann R Chemla; Sergey Plyasunov; Steven B Smith; José M Lázaro; Margarita Salas; Carlos Bustamante
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  The mutational spectrum of single base-pair substitutions causing human genetic disease: patterns and predictions.

Authors:  D N Cooper; M Krawczak
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  DNA polymerase fidelity: from genetics toward a biochemical understanding.

Authors:  M F Goodman; K D Fygenson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic and molecular analyses of spontaneous mutants of human rhinovirus 14 that are resistant to an antiviral compound.

Authors:  B A Heinz; R R Rueckert; D A Shepard; F J Dutko; M A McKinlay; M Fancher; M G Rossmann; J Badger; T J Smith
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Determinants of Base-Pair Substitution Patterns Revealed by Whole-Genome Sequencing of DNA Mismatch Repair Defective Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Patricia L Foster; Brittany A Niccum; Ellen Popodi; Jesse P Townes; Heewook Lee; Wazim MohammedIsmail; Haixu Tang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.