Po T Wang1, Everardo Camacho1, Ming Wang1, Yongcheng Li2, Susan J Shaw3,4, Michelle Armacost3,4, Hui Gong3,4, Daniel Kramer5,6, Brian Lee5,6, Richard A Andersen7, Charles Y Liu5,6, Payam Heydari8, Zoran Nenadic1,8, An H Do2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America. 2. Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America. 3. Department of Neurology, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, United States of America. 4. Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, CA 90089, United States of America. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, United States of America. 6. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States of America. 7. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, United States of America. 8. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: State-of-the-art invasive brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have shown significant promise, but rely on external electronics and wired connections between the brain and these external components. This configuration presents health risks and limits practical use. These limitations can be addressed by designing a fully implantable BMI similar to existing FDA-approved implantable devices. Here, a prototype BMI system whose size and power consumption are comparable to those of fully implantable medical devices was designed and implemented, and its performance was tested at the benchtop and bedside. APPROACH: A prototype of a fully implantable BMI system was designed and implemented as a miniaturized embedded system. This benchtop analogue was tested in its ability to acquire signals, train a decoder, perform online decoding, wirelessly control external devices, and operate independently on battery. Furthermore, performance metrics such as power consumption were benchmarked. MAIN RESULTS: An analogue of a fully implantable BMI was fabricated with a miniaturized form factor. A patient undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation with an electrocorticogram (ECoG) grid implanted over the primary motor cortex was recruited to operate the system. Seven online runs were performed with an average binary state decoding accuracy of 87.0% (lag optimized, or 85.0% at fixed latency). The system was powered by a wirelessly rechargeable battery, consumed ∼150 mW, and operated for >60 h on a single battery cycle. SIGNIFICANCE: The BMI analogue achieved immediate and accurate decoding of ECoG signals underlying hand movements. A wirelessly rechargeable battery and other supporting functions allowed the system to function independently. In addition to the small footprint and acceptable power and heat dissipation, these results suggest that fully implantable BMI systems are feasible.
OBJECTIVE: State-of-the-art invasive brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have shown significant promise, but rely on external electronics and wired connections between the brain and these external components. This configuration presents health risks and limits practical use. These limitations can be addressed by designing a fully implantable BMI similar to existing FDA-approved implantable devices. Here, a prototype BMI system whose size and power consumption are comparable to those of fully implantable medical devices was designed and implemented, and its performance was tested at the benchtop and bedside. APPROACH: A prototype of a fully implantable BMI system was designed and implemented as a miniaturized embedded system. This benchtop analogue was tested in its ability to acquire signals, train a decoder, perform online decoding, wirelessly control external devices, and operate independently on battery. Furthermore, performance metrics such as power consumption were benchmarked. MAIN RESULTS: An analogue of a fully implantable BMI was fabricated with a miniaturized form factor. A patient undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation with an electrocorticogram (ECoG) grid implanted over the primary motor cortex was recruited to operate the system. Seven online runs were performed with an average binary state decoding accuracy of 87.0% (lag optimized, or 85.0% at fixed latency). The system was powered by a wirelessly rechargeable battery, consumed ∼150 mW, and operated for >60 h on a single battery cycle. SIGNIFICANCE: The BMI analogue achieved immediate and accurate decoding of ECoG signals underlying hand movements. A wirelessly rechargeable battery and other supporting functions allowed the system to function independently. In addition to the small footprint and acceptable power and heat dissipation, these results suggest that fully implantable BMI systems are feasible.
Authors: Corinne S Mestais; Guillaume Charvet; Fabien Sauter-Starace; Michael Foerster; David Ratel; Alim Louis Benabid Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Po T Wang; Christine E King; Colin M McCrimmon; Jack J Lin; Mona Sazgar; Frank P K Hsu; Susan J Shaw; David E Millet; Luis A Chui; Charles Y Liu; An H Do; Zoran Nenadic Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Alireza Karimi-Bidhendi; Omid Malekzadeh-Arasteh; Mao-Cheng Lee; Colin M McCrimmon; Po T Wang; Akshay Mahajan; Charles Yu Liu; Zoran Nenadic; An H Do; Payam Heydari Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.833
Authors: Michael H Repacholi; Alexander Lerchl; Martin Röösli; Zenon Sienkiewicz; Anssi Auvinen; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Guglielmo d'Inzeo; Paul Elliott; Patrizia Frei; Sabine Heinrich; Isabelle Lagroye; Anna Lahkola; David L McCormick; Silke Thomas; Paolo Vecchia Journal: Bioelectromagnetics Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 2.010
Authors: Leigh R Hochberg; Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; John D Simeral; Joern Vogel; Sami Haddadin; Jie Liu; Sydney S Cash; Patrick van der Smagt; John P Donoghue Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Christine E King; Po T Wang; Colin M McCrimmon; Cathy C Y Chou; An H Do; Zoran Nenadic Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: David A Schwarz; Mikhail A Lebedev; Timothy L Hanson; Dragan F Dimitrov; Gary Lehew; Jim Meloy; Sankaranarayani Rajangam; Vivek Subramanian; Peter J Ifft; Zheng Li; Arjun Ramakrishnan; Andrew Tate; Katie Z Zhuang; Miguel A L Nicolelis Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Hyochan An; Samuel R Nason-Tomaszewski; Jongyup Lim; Kyumin Kwon; Matthew S Willsey; Parag G Patil; Hun-Seok Kim; Dennis Sylvester; Cynthia A Chestek; David Blaauw Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 5.234
Authors: Sumner L Norman; David Maresca; Vassilios N Christopoulos; Whitney S Griggs; Charlie Demene; Mickael Tanter; Mikhail G Shapiro; Richard A Andersen Journal: Neuron Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: John D Simeral; Thomas Hosman; Jad Saab; Sharlene N Flesher; Marco Vilela; Brian Franco; Jessica N Kelemen; David M Brandman; John G Ciancibello; Paymon G Rezaii; Emad N Eskandar; David M Rosler; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson; Arto V Nurmikko; Leigh R Hochberg Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 4.538