Literature DB >> 35594208

A Power-Efficient Brain-Machine Interface System With a Sub-mw Feature Extraction and Decoding ASIC Demonstrated in Nonhuman Primates.

Hyochan An, Samuel R Nason-Tomaszewski, Jongyup Lim, Kyumin Kwon, Matthew S Willsey, Parag G Patil, Hun-Seok Kim, Dennis Sylvester, Cynthia A Chestek, David Blaauw.   

Abstract

Intracortical brain-machine interfaces have shown promise for restoring function to people with paralysis, but their translation to portable and implantable devices is hindered by their high power consumption. Recent devices have drastically reduced power consumption compared to standard experimental brain-machine interfaces, but still require wired or wireless connections to computing hardware for feature extraction and inference. Here, we introduce a Neural Recording And Decoding (NeuRAD) application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) in 180 nm CMOS that can extract neural spiking features and predict two-dimensional behaviors in real-time. To reduce amplifier and feature extraction power consumption, the NeuRAD has a hardware accelerator for extracting spiking band power (SBP) from intracortical spiking signals and includes an M0 processor with a fixed-point Matrix Acceleration Unit (MAU) for efficient and flexible decoding. We validated device functionality by recording SBP from a nonhuman primate implanted with a Utah microelectrode array and predicting the one- and two-dimensional finger movements the monkey was attempting to execute in closed-loop using a steady-state Kalman filter (SSKF). Using the NeuRAD's real-time predictions, the monkey achieved 100% success rate and 0.82 s mean target acquisition time to control one-dimensional finger movements using just 581 μW. To predict two-dimensional finger movements, the NeuRAD consumed 588 μW to enable the monkey to achieve a 96% success rate and 2.4 s mean acquisition time. By employing SBP, ASIC brain-machine interfaces can close the gap to enable fully implantable therapies for people with paralysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35594208      PMCID: PMC9375520          DOI: 10.1109/TBCAS.2022.3175926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst        ISSN: 1932-4545            Impact factor:   5.234


  55 in total

1.  Neural prosthetic control signals from plan activity.

Authors:  Krishna V Shenoy; Daniella Meeker; Shiyan Cao; Sohaib A Kureshi; Bijan Pesaran; Christopher A Buneo; Aaron P Batista; Partha P Mitra; Joel W Burdick; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  A low-power band of neuronal spiking activity dominated by local single units improves the performance of brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Samuel R Nason; Alex K Vaskov; Matthew S Willsey; Elissa J Welle; Hyochan An; Philip P Vu; Autumn J Bullard; Chrono S Nu; Jonathan C Kao; Krishna V Shenoy; Taekwang Jang; Hun-Seok Kim; David Blaauw; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 25.671

3.  Predicting movement from multiunit activity.

Authors:  Eran Stark; Moshe Abeles
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spike train decoding without spike sorting.

Authors:  Valérie Ventura
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  A 10.8 µW Neural Signal Recorder and Processor With Unsupervised Analog Classifier for Spike Sorting.

Authors:  Han Hao; Jiahe Chen; Andrew Richardson; Jan Van der Spiegel; Firooz Aflatouni
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.833

6.  System-Level Design of a 64-Channel Low Power Neural Spike Recording Sensor.

Authors:  Manuel Delgado-Restituto; Alberto Rodriguez-Perez; Angela Darie; Cristina Soto-Sanchez; Eduardo Fernandez-Jover; Angel Rodriguez-Vazquez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.833

7.  Neural control of finger movement via intracortical brain-machine interface.

Authors:  Z T Irwin; K E Schroeder; P P Vu; A J Bullard; D M Tat; C S Nu; A Vaskov; S R Nason; D E Thompson; J N Bentley; P G Patil; C A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  A brain-computer interface that evokes tactile sensations improves robotic arm control.

Authors:  Jennifer L Collinger; Robert A Gaunt; Sharlene N Flesher; John E Downey; Jeffrey M Weiss; Christopher L Hughes; Angelica J Herrera; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A high-performance neural prosthesis enabled by control algorithm design.

Authors:  Vikash Gilja; Paul Nuyujukian; Cindy A Chestek; John P Cunningham; Byron M Yu; Joline M Fan; Mark M Churchland; Matthew T Kaufman; Jonathan C Kao; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Home Use of a Percutaneous Wireless Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface by Individuals With Tetraplegia.

Authors:  John D Simeral; Thomas Hosman; Jad Saab; Sharlene N Flesher; Marco Vilela; Brian Franco; Jessica N Kelemen; David M Brandman; John G Ciancibello; Paymon G Rezaii; Emad N Eskandar; David M Rosler; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson; Arto V Nurmikko; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.