Literature DB >> 31585117

Recent insights into the naïve state of human pluripotency and its applications.

Chen Dong1, Laura A Fischer1, Thorold W Theunissen2.   

Abstract

The past decade has seen significant interest in the isolation of pluripotent stem cells corresponding to various stages of mammalian embryonic development. Two distinct and well-defined pluripotent states can be derived from mouse embryos: "naïve" pluripotent cells with properties of pre-implantation epiblast, and "primed" pluripotent cells, resembling post-implantation epiblast. Prompted by the successful interconversion between these two stem cell states in the mouse system, several groups have devised strategies for inducing a naïve state of pluripotency in human pluripotent stem cells. Here, we review recent insights into the naïve state of human pluripotency, focusing on two methods that confer defining transcriptomic and epigenomic signatures of the pre-implantation embryo. The isolation of naïve human pluripotent stem cells offers a window into early developmental mechanisms that cannot be adequately modeled in primed cells, such as X chromosome reactivation, metabolic reprogramming, and the regulation of hominid-specific transposable elements. We outline key unresolved questions regarding naïve human pluripotency, including its extrinsic and intrinsic control mechanisms, potential for embryonic and extraembryonic differentiation, and general utility as a model system for human development and disease.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lineage potential; Naive pluripotency; Reprogramming; Transposable elements; X chromosome inactivation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31585117     DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  16 in total

Review 1.  Stepwise pluripotency transitions in mouse stem cells.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Endoh; Hitoshi Niwa
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 9.071

2.  Integrated multi-omics reveal polycomb repressive complex 2 restricts human trophoblast induction.

Authors:  Dick W Zijlmans; Irene Talon; Sigrid Verhelst; Adam Bendall; Karlien Van Nerum; Alok Javali; Andrew A Malcolm; Sam S F A van Knippenberg; Laura Biggins; San Kit To; Adrian Janiszewski; Danielle Admiraal; Ruth Knops; Nikky Corthout; Bradley P Balaton; Grigorios Georgolopoulos; Amitesh Panda; Natarajan V Bhanu; Amanda J Collier; Charlene Fabian; Ryan N Allsop; Joel Chappell; Thi Xuan Ai Pham; Michael Oberhuemer; Cankat Ertekin; Lotte Vanheer; Paraskevi Athanasouli; Frederic Lluis; Dieter Deforce; Joop H Jansen; Benjamin A Garcia; Michiel Vermeulen; Nicolas Rivron; Maarten Dhaenens; Hendrik Marks; Peter J Rugg-Gunn; Vincent Pasque
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 28.213

3.  Pluripotent stem cell assays: Modalities and applications for predictive developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Aldert H Piersma; Nancy C Baker; George P Daston; Burkhard Flick; Michio Fujiwara; Thomas B Knudsen; Horst Spielmann; Noriyuki Suzuki; Katya Tsaioun; Hajime Kojima
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  ID proteins promote the survival and primed-to-naive transition of human embryonic stem cells through TCF3-mediated transcription.

Authors:  Haibin Jiang; Mingxia Du; Yaning Li; Tengfei Zhou; Jia Lei; Hongqing Liang; Zhen Zhong; Rafia S Al-Lamki; Ming Jiang; Jun Yang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 9.685

5.  Human naive epiblast cells possess unrestricted lineage potential.

Authors:  Ge Guo; Giuliano Giuseppe Stirparo; Stanley E Strawbridge; Daniel Spindlow; Jian Yang; James Clarke; Anish Dattani; Ayaka Yanagida; Meng Amy Li; Sam Myers; Buse Nurten Özel; Jennifer Nichols; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Generating Trophoblast Stem Cells from Human Naïve Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Chen Dong; Thorold W Theunissen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Cell-Surface Proteomics Identifies Differences in Signaling and Adhesion Protein Expression between Naive and Primed Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wojdyla; Amanda J Collier; Charlene Fabian; Paola S Nisi; Laura Biggins; David Oxley; Peter J Rugg-Gunn
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 7.765

Review 8.  New Insights into X-Chromosome Reactivation during Reprogramming to Pluripotency.

Authors:  Amitesh Panda; Jan J Zylicz; Vincent Pasque
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Derivation of trophoblast stem cells from naïve human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Chen Dong; Mariana Beltcheva; Paul Gontarz; Bo Zhang; Pooja Popli; Laura A Fischer; Shafqat A Khan; Kyoung-Mi Park; Eun-Ja Yoon; Xiaoyun Xing; Ramakrishna Kommagani; Ting Wang; Lilianna Solnica-Krezel; Thorold W Theunissen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Cancer-Related Mutations Are Not Enriched in Naive Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Giuliano Giuseppe Stirparo; Austin Smith; Ge Guo
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 25.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.