Theresa Störk1, Jasmin Nessler2, Linda Anderegg3, Enrice Hünerfauth2, Isabelle Schmutz3, Vidhya Jagannathan3, Kaisa Kyöstilä4,5,6, Hannes Lohi4,5,6, Wolfgang Baumgärtner1, Andrea Tipold2, Tosso Leeb3. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany. 2. Department for Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany. 3. Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Switzerland. 4. Department of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 5. Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland. 6. Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
We report a hereditary leukodystrophy in Standard Schnauzer puppies. Clinical signs occurred shortly after birth or started at an age of under 4 weeks and included apathy, dysphoric vocalization, hypermetric ataxia, intension tremor, head tilt, circling, proprioceptive deficits, seizures and ventral strabismus consistent with a diffuse intracranial lesion. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a diffuse white matter disease without mass effect. Macroscopically, the cerebral white matter showed a gelatinous texture in the centrum semiovale. A mild hydrocephalus internus was noted. Histopathologically, a severe multifocal reduction of myelin formation and moderate diffuse edema without inflammation was detected leading to the diagnosis of leukodystrophy. Combined linkage analysis and homozygosity mapping in two related families delineated critical intervals of approximately 29 Mb. The comparison of whole genome sequence data of one affected Standard Schnauzer to 221 control genomes revealed a single private homozygous protein changing variant in the critical intervals, TSEN54:c.371G>A or p.(Gly124Asp). TSEN54 encodes the tRNA splicing endonuclease subunit 54. In humans, several variants in TSEN54 were reported to cause different types of pontocerebellar hypoplasia. The genotypes at the c.371G>A variant were perfectly associated with the leukodystrophy phenotype in 12 affected Standard Schnauzers and almost 1000 control dogs from different breeds. These results suggest that TSEN54:c.371G>A causes the leukodystrophy. The identification of a candidate causative variant enables genetic testing so that the unintentional breeding of affected Standard Schnauzers can be avoided in the future. Our findings extend the known genotype-phenotype correlation for TSEN54 variants.
We report a hereditary leukodystrophy in Standard Schnauzer puppies. Clinical signs occurred shortly after birth or started at an age of under 4 weeks and included apathy, dysphoric vocalization, hypermetric ataxia, intension tremor, head tilt, circling, proprioceptive deficits, seizures and ventral strabismus consistent with a diffuse intracranial lesion. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a diffuse white matter disease without mass effect. Macroscopically, the cerebral white matter showed a gelatinous texture in the centrum semiovale. A mild hydrocephalus internus was noted. Histopathologically, a severe multifocal reduction of myelin formation and moderate diffuse edema without inflammation was detected leading to the diagnosis of leukodystrophy. Combined linkage analysis and homozygosity mapping in two related families delineated critical intervals of approximately 29 Mb. The comparison of whole genome sequence data of one affected Standard Schnauzer to 221 control genomes revealed a single private homozygous protein changing variant in the critical intervals, TSEN54:c.371G>A or p.(Gly124Asp). TSEN54 encodes the tRNA splicing endonuclease subunit 54. In humans, several variants in TSEN54 were reported to cause different types of pontocerebellar hypoplasia. The genotypes at the c.371G>A variant were perfectly associated with the leukodystrophy phenotype in 12 affected Standard Schnauzers and almost 1000 control dogs from different breeds. These results suggest that TSEN54:c.371G>A causes the leukodystrophy. The identification of a candidate causative variant enables genetic testing so that the unintentional breeding of affected Standard Schnauzers can be avoided in the future. Our findings extend the known genotype-phenotype correlation for TSEN54 variants.
The term leukoencephalopathy refers to several disorders affecting the white matter of the central nervous system (CNS) [1,2]. In most cases oligodendrocytes are directly or indirectly affected by derangement of cellular and molecular pathways causing reduced myelin production consisting of diminished quantities, quality or both of this essential component [2]. Depending on the underlying pathology, leukoencephalopathies can be further divided into two major categories: leukodystrophy and hypomyelination.In human medicine, hypomyelination, also known as hypomyelinogenesis or dysmyelinogenesis, is mostly associated with genetic, rarely viral or toxic disorders leading to insufficient or delayed formation of myelin [3,4]. On the other hand, the term leukodystrophy refers to progressive disorders of glial cells and myelin maintenance [1,5] resulting in bilateral symmetric lesions in selective areas of the CNS white matter [4]. The diagnosis is accomplished via a combination of the clinical course of the disease, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), pathology and genetic testing [1,4]. Abnormal formation, turnover and destruction of the myelin are often caused by a lack of specific enzymes and inborn errors of metabolism [1,4,5].In veterinary medicine, leukodystrophies were described in many different dog breeds, such as leukomyeloencephalopathy in Rottweiler [6-8] and Leonberger dogs [9], globoid cell leukodystrophy or Krabbe’s disease in West Highland White Terriers [10,11] and Australian Kelpies [12], cavitating leukodystrophy in Dalmatians [13], fibrinoid leukodystrophy or Alexander’s disease in a Labrador Retriever [14] and necrotizing myelopathy in Afghan hounds [15]. In some of these diseases an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance was described [11-13]. Causative genetic variants have been identified in GFAP (Labrador Retriever, [14]), NAPELD (Leonberger Dogs, [9]), and VPS11 (Rottweiler dogs, [8]). The present study aimed to characterize clinical and pathological features of a new leukodystrophy in Standard Schnauzer puppies and to identify its underlying genetic cause.
Results
Clinical description
A dog breeder reported neurological deficits affecting multiple Standard Schnauzer puppies over the last ~10 years. Several puppies from different litters involving different dams were weak and showed progressive neurological signs such as dysphagia, non-ambulatory tetraparesis or sudden death.For further evaluation of a potential genetic defect in Standard Schnauzers, six puppies (no. 1–4 and 13–14) of two different litters, 4 weeks of age, and one mother of the litters (no. 15) were presented to the Neurology Service of the Department for Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover.Two of the six presented puppies (no. 13 and 14) and the bitch (no. 15) were clinically unremarkable (S1 Table). The remaining four puppies (no. 1–4) were smaller than the unaffected siblings (1.0–1.4 kg versus 1.8–2.0 kg). Clinical signs included hypermetric ataxia, circling, dysphoria, head tilt (ipsi- or contralateral to direction of circling), bilateral ventro-lateral strabismus and generalized tonic-clonic seizures at the neurological examination. Neuroanatomical localization in affected puppies indicated diffuse intracranial lesions with a predominance of forebrain signs.Basic clinical pathology (differential cell count, liver enzymes, bile acid, bilirubin, urea, creatinine, glucose, total protein, albumin, and electrolytes) of all puppies and cytological examination of the bitch´s milk were unremarkable.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain of one affected puppy (no. 1) revealed mildly enlarged lateral ventricles and a well demarcated bilateral almost symmetrical lesion affecting the deep and subcortical white matter of the cerebrum diffusely without any mass effect (Fig 1A–1D). The lesion was markedly hyperintense in T2-weighted (T2w) images and hypointense in T1-weighted (T1w) and fluid accentuated inversion recovery sequence (FLAIR). Partial loss of cerebral parenchyma led to a higher content of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the tissue. No pathological contrast enhancement was visible. MRI of one of the unaffected Schnauzer puppies (no. 14) was performed to exclude subclinical lesions and revealed a decreased distinction between white and grey matter (Fig 1E–1H) indicating a premature myelination which is considered normal at the age of 4 weeks [16]. CSF could not be obtained. Due to the severe and progressive clinical signs, the four affected puppies were humanely euthanized.
Fig 1
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
(A-D) Affected 4 weeks old Schnauzer puppy (no. 1) and (E-H) a clinically normal sibling at the same age (no. 14). (A, B, E, F) T2 weighted (T2w) sequences; (A, E) transversal and (B, F) dorsal. (C, D, G, H) T1 weighted (T1w) sequences; (C, G) transversal and (D, H) dorsal. MRI reveals mildly enlarged and asymmetric lateral ventricles and a T2w-hyperintense/T1w-hypointense lesion diffusely involving the whole cerebral white matter in affected animals. The age matched unaffected sibling shows beginning myelination in the central deep white matter, typical for the age.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
(A-D) Affected 4 weeks old Schnauzer puppy (no. 1) and (E-H) a clinically normal sibling at the same age (no. 14). (A, B, E, F) T2 weighted (T2w) sequences; (A, E) transversal and (B, F) dorsal. (C, D, G, H) T1 weighted (T1w) sequences; (C, G) transversal and (D, H) dorsal. MRI reveals mildly enlarged and asymmetric lateral ventricles and a T2w-hyperintense/T1w-hypointense lesion diffusely involving the whole cerebral white matter in affected animals. The age matched unaffected sibling shows beginning myelination in the central deep white matter, typical for the age.
Necropsy and light microscopy
A total of 12 Standard Schnauzer puppies with neurological disease were examined (no. 1-12). These included the four clinically investigated puppies (no. 1–4). Relevant pathomorphological findings during necropsy were restricted to the CNS. The cerebrum of all 12 puppies showed macroscopically a mild bilateral internal hydrocephalus and the borders between gray and white matter were indistinct. Additionally, the white matter of the cerebrum had a gelatinous consistence and showed edema in the 4 week old puppies no. 1–4.Histologically, a mild (no. 5–12) to severe (no. 1–4), bilateral symmetric multifocal lack of myelin, mainly in the centrum semiovale was observed using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and luxol fast blue and cresyl echt violet (LFB) staining. Additionally, a moderate, diffuse edema was found in the white matter of the cerebrum of affected animals no. 1–4 (Figs 2–4).
Fig 2
Macroscopic overview.
(A, B) Age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) Dorsal view on cerebrum, cerebellum and brainstem with section plane (white line). (B) Cross section of cerebrum showing the centrum semiovale (red circle).
Fig 4
Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry of the white matter in the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A, C, E) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B, D, F) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) Severe, diffuse lacking bluish staining, indicating myelin loss and edema in the centrum semiovale (asterisk). Only single fine strands of myelin can be detected (circle). (LFB). (B) Regularly developed myelin characterized by prominent bluish staining in the white matter (dark blue). (LFB). (C) Areas of severe myelin loss in the diseased puppies reveal low numbers of damaged axons (arrows). Vacuolization and loosening of the parenchyma indicate moderate edema. Inset shows a damaged axon at a higher magnification. (β-amyloid precursor protein, APP). (D) No axonal damage is detectable in healthy control animals. (APP). (E) Severe, diffuse lacking blue-greenish staining, indicating myelin loss and edema, in the centrum semiovale, containing low numbers of damaged axons (arrows). Vacuolization and loosening of the parenchyma represent the moderate edema. Inset shows a damaged axon at a higher magnification. (APP, LFB). (F) Regularly developed myelin characterized by prominent blue-greenish staining in the white matter (dark teal) without any damaged axons. (APP, LFB).
Macroscopic overview.
(A, B) Age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) Dorsal view on cerebrum, cerebellum and brainstem with section plane (white line). (B) Cross section of cerebrum showing the centrum semiovale (red circle).
Histopathology of the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) Reduced eosinophilia and moderate, diffuse edema of the white matter (asterisk) of affected puppy. (HE). (B) Regular diffuse eosinophilia, indicating normal myelination, in the white matter of an age matched control puppy. (HE).
Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry of the white matter in the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A, C, E) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B, D, F) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) Severe, diffuse lacking bluish staining, indicating myelin loss and edema in the centrum semiovale (asterisk). Only single fine strands of myelin can be detected (circle). (LFB). (B) Regularly developed myelin characterized by prominent bluish staining in the white matter (dark blue). (LFB). (C) Areas of severe myelin loss in the diseased puppies reveal low numbers of damaged axons (arrows). Vacuolization and loosening of the parenchyma indicate moderate edema. Inset shows a damaged axon at a higher magnification. (β-amyloid precursor protein, APP). (D) No axonal damage is detectable in healthy control animals. (APP). (E) Severe, diffuse lacking blue-greenish staining, indicating myelin loss and edema, in the centrum semiovale, containing low numbers of damaged axons (arrows). Vacuolization and loosening of the parenchyma represent the moderate edema. Inset shows a damaged axon at a higher magnification. (APP, LFB). (F) Regularly developed myelin characterized by prominent blue-greenish staining in the white matter (dark teal) without any damaged axons. (APP, LFB).Using β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) specific immunohistochemistry, mild, multifocal axonal damage was noticed in areas of severe lack of myelin (Fig 4C and 4D). In the combined APP immunohistochemistry and LFB staining the colocalization of axonal damage and myelin loss was visualized (Fig 4E and 4F).In addition to the more general histochemical stain for myelin, LFB, two other different myelin stains were applied, using 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide-3′-phosphodiesterase (CNPase) as a marker for early myelin formation and myelin basic protein (MBP) as the prototype of mature myelin formation.CNPase immunohistochemistry revealed almost no detectable myelin within the centrum semiovale and a slightly reduced number of oligodendrocytes in puppies no. 1–4. However, the cytoplasm of the oligodendrocytes and their fragmented processes were strongly positive (Fig 5A and 5B). Reduced myelination within centrum semiovale was confirmed using an anti-MBP antibody. Only single, fine strands of myelin were detected in the affected CNS regions in contrast to the dense meshwork of myelin in unaffected areas of the same animal and in age matched controls no. 1009–1016 (Fig 5C and 5D).
Fig 5
Immunohistochemistry of the white matter in the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A, C) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B, D) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) In affected puppies almost no myelin is detectable whereas oligodendrocytes show fragmented processes and a strongly perinuclear cytoplasmic positive signal (arrows). Inset shows an oligodendrocyte with strong perinuclear cytoplasmic signal in a higher magnification. (CNPase). (B) In age matched controls the white matter shows a marked, diffuse brownish staining of the myelin. (CNPase). (C) Only single, fine strands of myelin (asterisk) were detected in contrast to the dense meshwork of myelin in adjacent non-affected areas (circle) of diseased puppies. (MBP). (D) Age matched control puppies show a diffuse staining of the myelin of the white matter (MBP).
Immunohistochemistry of the white matter in the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A, C) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B, D) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) In affected puppies almost no myelin is detectable whereas oligodendrocytes show fragmented processes and a strongly perinuclear cytoplasmic positive signal (arrows). Inset shows an oligodendrocyte with strong perinuclear cytoplasmic signal in a higher magnification. (CNPase). (B) In age matched controls the white matter shows a marked, diffuse brownish staining of the myelin. (CNPase). (C) Only single, fine strands of myelin (asterisk) were detected in contrast to the dense meshwork of myelin in adjacent non-affected areas (circle) of diseased puppies. (MBP). (D) Age matched control puppies show a diffuse staining of the myelin of the white matter (MBP).We quantified mature myelinating oligodendrocytes using an antibody against neurite outgrowth inhibitor A (NogoA). Within the centrum semiovale, affected Schnauzer puppies show only single NogoA+ oligodendrocytes, whereas age matched healthy control animals show up to eight times as many myelinating NogoA+ oligodendrocytes as the affected animals in this area (Fig 6).
Fig 6
Immunohistochemistry of the white matter in the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) In affected puppies, only single NogoA+ oligodendrocytes are detectable (arrows). Vacuolization and loosening of the parenchyma indicate the moderate edema. Inset shows a NogoA+ oligodendrocyte at a higher magnification. (NogoA). (B) Age matched control animals show numerous NogoA+ myelinating oligodendrocytes. Inset shows NogoA+ oligodendrocytes at a higher magnification. (NogoA). (C) Statistical analysis of NogoA-immunohistochemstry shows significantly decreased numbers of myelinating oligodendrocytes in the centrum semiovale of the affected Schnauzer puppies (n = 4, no.1, 2, 3 and 4) in comparison to age matched control animals (n = 4, no. 1009, 1010, 1011 and 1012). Box and whisker plots display median and quartiles with maximum and minimum values. Significant difference (p ≤ 0.05, Mann-Whitney U-test) is labeled by asterisk.
(A) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) In affected puppies, only single NogoA+ oligodendrocytes are detectable (arrows). Vacuolization and loosening of the parenchyma indicate the moderate edema. Inset shows a NogoA+ oligodendrocyte at a higher magnification. (NogoA). (B) Age matched control animals show numerous NogoA+ myelinating oligodendrocytes. Inset shows NogoA+ oligodendrocytes at a higher magnification. (NogoA). (C) Statistical analysis of NogoA-immunohistochemstry shows significantly decreased numbers of myelinating oligodendrocytes in the centrum semiovale of the affected Schnauzer puppies (n = 4, no.1, 2, 3 and 4) in comparison to age matched control animals (n = 4, no. 1009, 1010, 1011 and 1012). Box and whisker plots display median and quartiles with maximum and minimum values. Significant difference (p ≤ 0.05, Mann-Whitney U-test) is labeled by asterisk.Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-immunohistochemistry detected a mildly reduced density of astrocytes within the white matter. Most of these astrocytes had a plump morphology and developed shorter and reduced numbers of processes in comparison to the age matched controls (Fig 7A and 7B). Additionally, using the antibody against ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba-1) a higher number of macrophages/microglia within the affected white matter was detected, whereas an equal distribution of microglia within white and grey matter was observed in in the age matched controls. The majority of the macrophages/microglia within the white matter had an amoeboid morphology (Fig 7C and 7D). Cerebellum, brain stem, spinal cord and peripheral nerves were macroscopically and histologically unremarkable in the affected dogs.
Fig 7
Immunohistochemistry of the white matter in the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A, C) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B, D) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) There is a reduced density of astrocytes in the white matter of affected puppies. Most of the astrocytes have a plump morphology developing few short and bulky processes. Inset shows an astrocyte at a higher magnification. (GFAP). (B) In the white matter of age matched control puppies, astrocytes have long, slender branching processes. Inset shows an astrocyte at a higher magnification. (GFAP). (C) Diseased Schnauzer puppies reveal an elevated number of macrophages/microglia in the white matter. Many of these macrophages/microglia have an amoeboid or reactive morphology (arrows). Inset shows amoeboid macrophages/microglia at higher magnification. (Iba1). (D) In healthy control dogs, there is an equal distribution of microglia in the white (W) and the grey (G) matter. Most of the macrophages/microglia represent the ramified, non-reactive type. Inset shows macrophages/microglia at a higher magnification. (Iba1).
(A, C) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B, D) age matched healthy control no. 1009. (A) There is a reduced density of astrocytes in the white matter of affected puppies. Most of the astrocytes have a plump morphology developing few short and bulky processes. Inset shows an astrocyte at a higher magnification. (GFAP). (B) In the white matter of age matched control puppies, astrocytes have long, slender branching processes. Inset shows an astrocyte at a higher magnification. (GFAP). (C) Diseased Schnauzer puppies reveal an elevated number of macrophages/microglia in the white matter. Many of these macrophages/microglia have an amoeboid or reactive morphology (arrows). Inset shows amoeboid macrophages/microglia at higher magnification. (Iba1). (D) In healthy control dogs, there is an equal distribution of microglia in the white (W) and the grey (G) matter. Most of the macrophages/microglia represent the ramified, non-reactive type. Inset shows macrophages/microglia at a higher magnification. (Iba1).
Genetic analysis
The occurrence of leukodystrophy in multiple consecutive litters from related parents suggested an inherited disease. Pedigree analysis of the four affected puppies no. 1–4 revealed several inbreeding loops and was suggestive for a monogenic autosomal recessive inheritance (Fig 8). We obtained genomic DNA samples from the four cases (no. 1–4), five unaffected littermates (no. 13, 14, 19–21) and the four unaffected parents (no. 15–18) of these two litters. Linkage and autozygosity analysis were performed in the 13 available samples. Eight genomic segments on six different chromosomes with a total of 29,237,328 bp or roughly 1.2% of the 2.4 Gb dog genome showed linkage in both litters and shared homozygous genotypes in the four available cases (S2 Table).
Fig 8
Pedigree of Standard Schnauzers used for linkage analysis and autozygosity mapping.
Filled symbols represent dogs with leukodystrophy. For a better overview, the pedigree was drawn only with a subset of the closely related dogs. Two litters with a total of four affected dogs and their parents were used for linkage analysis. The four cases no. 1–4 were used for autozygosity mapping. Numbers indicate dogs, from which DNA samples were available. The solitary symbols in the square represent 8 additional affected Standard Schnauzers, for which no pedigree data was available (no. 5–12). For these dogs, only FFPE material was available for DNA isolation. The resulting DNA was of insufficient quality for genotyping on microarrays, but could be used to determine the genotypes at the TSEN54:c.371G>A variant. The TSEN54:c.371G>A genotypes for all dogs with DNA samples are indicated in the figure.
Pedigree of Standard Schnauzers used for linkage analysis and autozygosity mapping.
Filled symbols represent dogs with leukodystrophy. For a better overview, the pedigree was drawn only with a subset of the closely related dogs. Two litters with a total of four affected dogs and their parents were used for linkage analysis. The four cases no. 1–4 were used for autozygosity mapping. Numbers indicate dogs, from which DNA samples were available. The solitary symbols in the square represent 8 additional affected Standard Schnauzers, for which no pedigree data was available (no. 5–12). For these dogs, only FFPE material was available for DNA isolation. The resulting DNA was of insufficient quality for genotyping on microarrays, but could be used to determine the genotypes at the TSEN54:c.371G>A variant. The TSEN54:c.371G>A genotypes for all dogs with DNA samples are indicated in the figure.Whole genome sequencing of one of the affected dogs was performed (no. 2). Private homozygous protein-changing variants were identified by comparing the variants in the case with the genomes of 8 wolves and 213 dogs from various breeds (Table 1, S3 Table). The potential leukodystrophy status of control animals was unknown. However, as this is a rare and severe condition, we assumed the control dogs and wolves to be homozygous for the genome reference allele at the causative variant.
Table 1
Variants detected by whole genome resequencing of an affected Standard Schnauzer.
Filtering step
Variantsa
Homozygous variants in whole genome
2,891,805
Private homozygous variants in the whole genomeb
5,258
Private homozygous protein changing variants in the whole genome
32
Private homozygous protein changing variants in critical intervalsc
1
a All called variants were counted (no quality filter was used).
b Private variants were exclusively called in the affected dog and had homozygous reference or missing genotype calls in 221 control genomes.
c Intervals of combined linkage and homozygosity (S2 Table)
a All called variants were counted (no quality filter was used).b Private variants were exclusively called in the affected dog and had homozygous reference or missing genotype calls in 221 control genomes.c Intervals of combined linkage and homozygosity (S2 Table)The variant calling pipeline detected 2.9 million homozygous variants in the genome of the sequenced case. Of these, 32 were absent from the control genomes and predicted to be protein-changing. Only one private homozygous protein-changing variant was located in the critical intervals of combined linkage and autozygosity (Table 1, S4 Table). The variant can be designated as Chr9:5,015,506C>T (CanFam 3.1 assembly). It was a missense variant affecting exon 5 of the TSEN54 gene, XM_540434.6:c.371G>A, and predicted to result in a non-conservative exchange of a glycine into an aspartic acid, XP_540434.3:p.(Gly124Asp). The wildtype glycine is conserved in TSEN54 orthologs across phylogenetically diverse vertebrates (Fig 9).
Fig 9
Details of the TSEN54:c.371G>A variant.
(A) Sanger electropherograms from dogs with the three different genotypes confirm the presence of the variant. (B) A multiple species alignment of the TSEN54 amino acid sequence illustrates that the variant affects a highly conserved region of the protein. The wildtype glycine is perfectly conserved across diverse vertebrates. The yeast (S. cerevisiae) SEN54 protein shows overall low amino acid sequence homology with the vertebrate TSEN54 ortholog. However, the glycine residue is conserved and sits within a structurally conserved region consisting of an alpha-helix followed by a beta-sheet.
Details of the TSEN54:c.371G>A variant.
(A) Sanger electropherograms from dogs with the three different genotypes confirm the presence of the variant. (B) A multiple species alignment of the TSEN54 amino acid sequence illustrates that the variant affects a highly conserved region of the protein. The wildtype glycine is perfectly conserved across diverse vertebrates. The yeast (S. cerevisiae) SEN54 protein shows overall low amino acid sequence homology with the vertebrate TSEN54 ortholog. However, the glycine residue is conserved and sits within a structurally conserved region consisting of an alpha-helix followed by a beta-sheet.We genotyped the variant in a larger cohort of 381 Standard Schnauzers (no. 1–381). This cohort included the four cases from the linkage and autozygosity mapping experiment (no. 1-4) and an additional eight histopathologically confirmed cases from which only formalin-fixed material was available (no. 5–12). The genotypes at the TSEN54:c.371G>A variant were perfectly associated with the phenotype (PFisher = 6.1 x 10−22; Table 2). All 12 affected dogs carried the variant in homozygous state. Among the other 369 Standard Schnauzers, we observed 344 dogs that were homozygous wildtype (93.2%) and 25 dogs that were heterozygous (6.8%) and presumably carriers for the disease. The sires and dams (no. 15–18) of the four affected dogs from these two litters were heterozygous (obligate carriers). Most carriers of this variant were close relatives of the affected Standard Schnauzer puppies. Our cohort included 237 Standard Schnauzers from Finland, which were not specifically collected for this study. In this subset of dogs, there was only one carrier suggesting that the disease allele may not yet be widespread globally. We also genotyped 627 dogs from 72 genetically diverse breeds. None of these dogs carried the mutant allele at the TSEN54:c.371G>A variant (S5 Table).
Table 2
Association of the TSEN54:c.371G>A genotypes with leukodystrophy.
Genotype
G/G
A/G
A/A
Affected Standard Schnauzers (n = 12)
-
-
12
Standard Schnauzers, population controls (n = 369)
344
25
-
Dogs from other breeds (n = 627)a
627
-
-
aThese dogs do not include the 221 control genomes, which were used for the initial analysis. Thus, in total, the mutant allele was absent from >800 dogs of other breeds.
aThese dogs do not include the 221 control genomes, which were used for the initial analysis. Thus, in total, the mutant allele was absent from >800 dogs of other breeds.Immunofluorescence of the cerebrum with an anti-TSEN54 antibody revealed a similar intra-nucleolar signal in both affected and control animals (no. 1–4 vs. 1009–1016). The distribution and intensity of the signals were equal between cases and controls (Fig 10).
Fig 10
TSEN54 immunofluorescence of the white matter in the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B) age matched healthy control no. 1009. There is an almost equal number and distribution of cells showing an intranuclear positive signal for TSEN54 (red). Insets show TSEN54+ cells in a higher magnification.
TSEN54 immunofluorescence of the white matter in the centrum semiovale of the cerebrum.
(A) Affected puppy no. 1 and (B) age matched healthy control no. 1009. There is an almost equal number and distribution of cells showing an intranuclear positive signal for TSEN54 (red). Insets show TSEN54+ cells in a higher magnification.
Discussion
In this study, we describe a new inherited leukodystrophy in dogs and identify the TSEN54:c.Gly124Asp missense variant as a candidate cause of the disease.The progressive clinical course, the lesions visible in MRI and loss of myelin in the cerebrum seen light microscopically point towards a demyelinating leukodystrophy rather than to a hypomyelinating disease. Although there are many different types of leukodystrophy described in dogs [6-15], the distribution and also the histopathological appearance of the lesions described in the TSEN54 mutant dogs were different compared to previously described cases of canineleukodystrophy.Leukoencephalopathies are a heterogeneous group of diseases affecting the white matter of the brain. The etiology as well as clinical signs, findings in diagnostic imaging and histopathology are highly variable. In most leukoencephalopathies oligodendrocytes and myelin are predominantly affected, whereas axonal damage represents a rather infrequent finding. However, axonal damage in areas of myelin lack as shown in the present cases, has been reported as an epiphenomenon in leukodystrophies [17]. In several leukodystrophic diseases axonal damage is not directly caused by the lack of myelin or oligodendrocytes and rather represents a secondary event [18]. Several possible mechanisms of axonal damage in white matter diseases, such as sulfatide storage in metachromatic leukodystrophy in humans or aberrant glutamate homeostasis and nitric oxide production in multiple sclerosis have been described [19]. In addition, an impairment of axons as a consequence of demyelination and the associated loss of myelin-derived trophic support and ion imbalance according to the outside-in model cannot be excluded [20]. The pathomechanism of axonal damage in TSEN54 associated leukodystrophy is still unclear and warrants additional investigations.An inborn lack of central myelination leads to generalized tremor as observed in Springer Spaniels, Weimaraner dogs or Chow Chows [21-23]. Clinical signs, such as whole body tremor are present shortly after birth, might remain unchanged or decrease in severity with time [21-23]. MRI findings in hypomyelination syndromes are rather subtle and include mildly altered signal intensity of the white matter in comparison to age matched controls and resembles the myelin pattern of newborn individuals [4].Destruction of initially normal myelin in the course of the disease is a characteristic feature of leukodystrophies [2]. The results of the different myelin stains, underline the leukodystrophic character of the disease of the present cases [24,25]. CNPase immunohistochemistry detecting both immature oligodendrocytes and early myelin formation showed the presence of oligodendrocytes and the predominant absence of myelin in the centrum semiovale of the affected animals. In addition, the MBP immunohistochemistry revealed single fine strands of mature myelin in affected areas. This could be interpreted as an insufficient and inadequate myelin formation mediated by the detected genetic defect. Affected puppies are initially normal and develop progressive neurological signs mostly at 1–6 months of age dependent on the localization of the lesions. In humans, a systematic analysis of MRI patterns is used to differentiate leukodystrophies from other neurological diseases in children [4]. In veterinary medicine, MRI findings in leukodystrophies were only described in very few cases so far. Usually marked T2w hyperintense lesions are visible bilateral symmetrically in the white matter mostly of the forebrain without any mass effect. Depending on the disease, different distribution patterns of the lesions were described, affecting mostly the subcortical or the deep cerebral white matter with or without formation of cavitation [10,26,27]. It is very important to include all available information concerning macroscopy, histopathologic lesions, anamnesis and also genetics to come to an appropriate diagnosis.Several genetic defects have previously been associated with leukodystrophies. In this study, we identified the TSEN54:c.371G>A missense variant in affected dogs. The variant was identified during the analysis of two closely related litters with four affected puppies. A combination of linkage analysis, autozygosity mapping, and whole genome sequencing of one of the cases identified this variant as the only protein-changing sequence variant that was located in the critical intervals and private to the sequenced case. The mapping of the disease locus delineated several very large genomic intervals comprising more than 29 Mb. Therefore, the results from the two litters suggested TSEN54:c.371G>A as candidate causative variant with only relatively weak statistical support. During the further course of the research project, DNA from archived FFPE material of eight additional cases became available for genetic analyses. Considering that the mutant A-allele is overall relatively rare in Standard Schnauzers, the homozygous mutant A/A genotype in these eight additional cases provides very strong additional support for a presumed causative role of the TSEN54:c.371G>A missense variant in the phenotype. Taken together, all 12 Standard Schnauzers with leukodystrophy were homozygous A/A, while this genotype was not observed in ~1000 other dogs.On the other hand, it must be cautioned that the eight additional cases came from the same breeding lines as the initial four cases and may have been closely related. Thus, while the statistical support for the causality of the TSEN54:c.371G>A missense variant is very strong, it does not provide definitive proof for the causality. We cannot formally exclude the possibility that the TSEN54:c.371G>A variant is functionally neutral and in strong linkage disequilibrium to the true causative variant, which in this case might be e.g. a large structural variant and/or a non-coding regulatory variant. Large structural variants would have most likely been missed by our variant calling pipeline and non-coding regulatory variants would have been filtered during our prioritization of protein-changing variants.TSEN54 is a subunit of the tRNA splicing endonuclease complex [28]. Studies in yeast suggest that this complex consists of four subunits (SEN2, SEN34, SEN15 and SEN54) which play a role in multiple RNA processing events [29]. The exact three-dimensional structure of the eukaryotic tRNA splicing endonuclease complex has not yet been solved. The large SEN54 subunit is responsible for recognizing the precursor tRNA substrate and positioning the two catalytical subunits SEN2 and SEN34 to their respective cleavage sites [28]. In line with this role, yeastSEN54 is a highly basic protein, which facilitates its interaction with the negatively charged phosphates of the precursor-tRNA. The vertebrate ortholog of yeastSEN54, called TSEN54, shows relatively little sequence homology, but several structurally conserved motifs including a predicted alpha-helix followed by a beta-sheet at amino acids 117–131 [29]. The p.Gly124Asp variant in dogs with leukodystrophy replaces a glycine residue that is conserved across diverse eukaryotes from yeast to humans with a negatively charged aspartic acid. It is conceivable that either the spatial requirement of the side chain of the mutant aspartic acid interferes with the secondary structure of TSEN54 and/or that the additional negative charge hinders the binding of TSEN54 to the negatively charged precursor tRNA.TSEN54 has not been directly associated with leukodystrophy before. In humans, high expression of TSEN54 has been detected in neurons of the pons, cerebellar dentate and olivary nuclei during the second trimester of pregnancy. A functional endonuclease complex is essential for the development of these regions [30]. Genetic variants in TSEN54 cause pontocerebellar hypoplasia (PCH) type 2, 4 or 5 in humans [30-32]. PCH is characterized by hypoplasia of the cerebellum and the ventral pons, early postnatal death and progressive microcephaly and ventriculomegaly [30-33]. It is histopathologically associated with diffuse gliosis of the white matter in the brain [34,35]. In one humanpatient with PCH2, TSEN54:p.Tyr119Glu was identified as pathogenic variant. This variant is in close proximity to the caninep.Gly124Asp variant and also introduces an additional negative charge [36].In zebrafish, knockdown of TSEN54 results in brain hypoplasia and loss of structural definition in the brain due to increased cell death via loss of functional mechanism [37]. This could explain the phenotype found in the Standard Schnauzers with mutant TSEN54 described in our study. Dysfunction and early cell death of oligodendrocytes may lead to dysmyelination and impaired myelin maintenance which manifests as leukodystrophy. Immunohistochemical detection of TSEN54 in brains of affected Standard Schnauzers similarly to controls indicated a functional rather than a quantitative deficiency of TSEN54.The fact that TSEN54 variants mainly cause pontocerebellar hypoplasia in humans but leukodystrophy in the cerebrum of affected dogs might be explained by a possible distinct quality or degree of protein malfunction due to the different genetic variants within the gene. Alternatively, TSEN54 might be of minor importance in the neuronal development of dogs compared to humans and instead be mainly involved in oligodendrocyte function in the canine species compared to others.We describe here the first potentially pathogenic TSEN54 variant in dogs. Unlike in humans, where variants in TSEN54 cause pontocerebellar hypoplasia, the main finding in affected Standard Schnauzers is leukodystrophy. These findings expand the known genotype-phenotype correlation for TSEN54 variants.
Conclusions
This study indicates that TSEN54 should be considered as a new candidate gene for leukodystrophy. Our findings enable genetic testing for Standard Schnauzers, which can be used to avoid the unintentional breeding of affected puppies. This canineleukodystrophy might serve as a translational large animal model to better understand the function of the TSEN54 protein and its role in pathophysiology in health and disease.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All examinations were performed with written informed owner´s consent according to ethical guidelines of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation. Blood samples were collected with the approval of the Cantonal Committee for Animal Experiments (Canton of Bern; permit BE75/16). Sample collection in Finland was ethically approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of State Provincial Office of Southern Finland (ESAVI/343/04.10.07/2016). All animal experiments were done in accordance with local laws and regulations.
Clinical examinations
A breeder of Standard Schnauzers reported neurological deficits affecting multiple puppies from approximately ~2014 to ~2017. Several puppies from different litters and bitches were weak and showed progressive neurological signs such as dysphagia, non-ambulatory tetraparesis or sudden death. For further evaluation of a potential genetic defect in Standard Schnauzers, six puppies of two different litters (no. 1–4, 13, 14) were presented to the Neurology Service of the Department for Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover. One of the two dams (no. 15) of the affected puppies was also presented for clinical examination. Clinical examination of the puppies no. 1–4, 13–14 and one mother (no. 15) was performed by a resident and a Diplomate of the European College of Veterinary Neurology (ECVN). Details on each individual dog are summarized in the S1 Table.
Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI of puppies no. 1 and 14 were performed in general anesthesia. Puppies were sedated with diazepam (0.5 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.), Diazepam lipuro, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) and levomethadon (0.2 mg/kg i.v., L-Polamivet, MSD Animal Health GmbH, Unterschleißheim, Germany). General anesthesia was induced with propofol dosed to effect (1–3 mg/kg i.v., Narcofol, CP-Pharma, Burgdorf, Germany). Puppies were orotracheally intubated and connected to a semiclosed circle absorber system (Anaesthesia ventilator, Cato, Dräger, Langenhagen, Germany). Maintenance of anesthesia was performed with isoflurane (CP-Pharma) in an oxygen/air mixture (1:1, flow 50 ml/kg/min).The following MRI sequences were obtained with a 3.0-T scanner (Achieva, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands): T2w and T1w pre- and post-contrast administration (0.5 ml/kg i.v., Dotarem, medithek GmbH, Oststeinbek, Germany) each in sagittal, transversal and dorsal section as well as transversal section of FLAIR.
Necropsy and histological examination
Four euthanized Standard Schnauzer puppies (no. 1–4) were submitted for complete necropsy. Additionally, between 2014 and 2017, eight younger Standard Schnauzer puppies from the same breeder (no. 5–12), 3 to 21 days of age, had been sent to the Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany, for post mortem examination. Pathological examination was performed according to a routine protocol at the Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover. During necropsy representative samples of all organs and tissues were taken and subsequently fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin before being embedded in paraffin wax. For histological examination, 2–3 μm thick sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Additionally, luxol fast blue-and cresyl echt violet staining (LFB) was performed to examine myelination and neuronal degeneration within the central nervous system (CNS).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of cerebrum of affected animals (no. 1–12) and age-matched controls (no. 1009–1016) using monoclonal antibodies directed against 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide-3′-phosphodiesterase (CNPase; MAB 326, dilution 1:100; Chemicon International), β-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP; MAB 348, dilution 1:800, Chemicon International), and polyclonal antibodies against myelin basic protein (MBP; AB 980, dilution 1:800, Chemicon International), neurite outgrowth inhibitor A (NogoA; AB5664, dilution 1:500, Merck Milipore), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; Z 0334, dilution 1:200, DAKO) and ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba-1; PA5-27436, dilution 1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) to detect oligodendrocytes, axonal damage, astrocytes, and macrophages/microglia, respectively. Following a described standard protocol [38] endogenous peroxidase was blocked by a treatment with 0.5% H2O2 diluted in 80% ethanol. Subsequently, sections were heated in a sodium citrate buffer for antigen retrieval followed by blocking non-specific bindings with 20% goat serum. Thereafter sections were incubated with the primary antibodies for 90 minutes. Sections for negative control were incubated with non-immune serum. Biotinylated goat-anti-mouse IgG (BA-9200, dilution 1:200, Vector Laboratories) was used as secondary antibody. To visualize positive antigen-antibody-reaction, sections were incubated with avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC, PK-6100, Vector Laboratories) followed by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) with 0.03% H2O2, pH 7.2 for 5 minutes and slightly counterstained with Mayer’s hemalaun. For polyclonal antibodies against Iba-1 the same protocol was used but the secondary antibody was replaced by biotinylated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (BA-1000, dilution 1:200, Vector Laboratories). For polyclonal antibodies against MBP and GFAP the same protocol was used without the heating step and using biotinylated goat-anti-rabbit IgG as secondary antibody.For quantitative analysis of mature oligodendrocytes characterized by NogoA-immunohistochemistry, a morphometric grid (number of positive cell/0,0625mm2) was used.
Combination of immunohistochemistry and histochemistry
A combination of immunohistochemistry and histochemistry, using APP and LFB, was performed as described to point out the localization of damaged axons [38].
Immunofluorescence
Immunofluorescence was performed to visualize the distribution and localization of TSEN54 in the cerebrum according to an established protocol [39]. For this purpose, a monoclonal mouse anti-human-TSEN54-antibody (anti-TSEN54, sc-398327, dilution 1:50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc) was used. Following the same procedure as described above, after dewaxing and antigen retrieval, non-specific binding was blocked with 20% goat serum diluted in diluted in PBS/0.1% Triton X/1% BSA. Thereafter the sections were incubated with the primary anti-TSEN54 antibody, diluted in PBS/0.1% Triton X/1% BSA. Sections for negative control were incubated with non-immune serum.Goat-anti-mouse IgG CyTM3 (115-165-166, dilution 1:200, Jackson ImmunoResearch) was used as secondary antibody. Nuclear counter-staining was performed with 0.01% bisbenzimide (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH) and sections were mounted with Dako fluorescence mounting medium (DakoCytomation GmbH).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of non-normal distributed data generated by NogoA-immunohistochemistry was performed by using IBM “Statistic Package for Social Sciences” SPSS program for Windows (version 24) and applying a Mann-Withney U-test for two independent samples. A p-value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Animal selection for genetic analysis
The genetic study included 381 Standard Schnauzers (S1 Table) from different European countries and the USA. Twelve closely related dogs presented clinically and/or histopathologically with leukodystrophy were designated as cases (no. 1–12). The remaining 369 Standard Schnauzers represented population controls, for which there were no records of neurological disease. A subset of 237 controls were collected in Finland. This subset was used to estimate the disease allele frequency in a representative population. Samples from 627 additional dogs of 72 genetically diverse breeds, which had been donated to the Vetsuisse Biobank, were also used as controls (S5 Table).
DNA extraction
Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA blood and hair samples according standard methods using the Maxwell RSC Whole Blood DNA and the Maxwell RSC Blood DNA Kits in combination with the Maxwell RSC machine (Promega). Genomic DNA from FFPE tissue samples was extracted using the Maxwell RSC DNA FFPE Kit according manufacturer’s instructions. Furthermore, a semi-automated DNA extraction robot (PerkinElmer chemagen Technologie GmbH) was used to extract DNA from the Finnish Standard Schnauzer samples.
Linkage analysis and homozygosity mapping
Linkage analysis and homozygosity mapping with two families were performed (Fig 8). Genotype data for 13 members of these two families (no. 1–4, 13–21) were obtained with Illumina CanineHD BeadChips by Geneseek/Neogen and used for a parametric linkage analysis (S1 File). For all dogs, the call rate was > 95%. Using PLINK v 1.07 [40], markers that were non-informative, located on the sex chromosomes, or missing in any of the 13 dogs, had Mendel errors, or a minor allele frequency < 0.05, were removed. The final pruned dataset contained 88,546 markers. To analyze the data for parametric linkage, an autosomal recessive inheritance model with full penetrance, a disease allele frequency of 0.5 and the Merlin software [41] were applied.For homozygosity mapping, the genotype data for the four affected dogs were used. Markers that were missing in one of the four cases, markers on the sex chromosomes and markers with Mendel errors in the family were excluded. The --homozyg and --homozyg-group options in PLINK were used to search for extended regions of homozygosity > 1 Mb. The output intervals were matched against the intervals from linkage analysis in Excel spreadsheets to find overlapping regions.
Whole genome resequencing and variant filtering
An Illumina TruSeq PCR-free library with an insert size of 400 bp was prepared from one affected Standard Schnauzer (SM010) and 193 million 2 x 150 bp paired-end reads were obtained on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 instrument (21x coverage). Mapping and variant calling was done as described [42]. The sequence data were deposited under study accession PRJEB16012 and sample accession SAMEA104500412 at the European Nucleotide Archive. Functional effects and genomic context of the called variants were annotated using SnpEff software [43] together with the NCBI Canis lupus familiaris annotation release 104. For private variant filtering we used control genome sequences from 8 wolves and 213 dogs. These genomes were either publicly available [44] or produced during other previous projects (S3 Table).
PCR and Sanger sequencing
We used a Sanger sequencing protocol for targeted genotyping of the TSEN54:c.371G>A variant. Specifically, a 589 bp PCR product was amplified from genomic DNA using the AmpliTaqGold360Mastermix (Life Technologies) or the Biotools DNA Polymerase (Biotools B&M Labs, S.A.) together with primers 5‘-CGA AGA GGC CTT GTA TCT GC-3‘ (Primer F) and 5’-AAT TGC CAC CAC TAG GAT GC-3’ (Primer R). For the FFPE samples, a 254 bp PCR product was amplified from genomic DNA using the AmpliTaqGold360Mastermix (Life Technologies) together with primers 5’-GCC-TGG-AAG-TTG-CTC-CTT-TA-3’ (Primer FFPE F2) and 5’-CGG-CAC-CTC-ACT-GGT-ACT-C-3’ (Primer FFPE R2). After treatment with exonuclease I and alkaline phosphatase, amplicons were sequenced on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Life Technologies). Sanger sequences were analyzed with the Sequencher 5.1 software (GeneCodes).
Reference sequences
All analyses were performed using the CanFam 3.1 dog genome assembly as reference sequence. Numbering within the canineTSEN54 gene refers to NCBI RefSeq accessions XM_540434.6 (mRNA) and XP_540434.3 (protein) unless explicitly stated otherwise. Numbering within the humanTSEN54 gene refers to NCBI RefSeq accessions NM_207346.2 (mRNA) and NP_997229.2 (protein).
SNV microarray genotypes of 13 Standard Schnauzers (ped- and map-file).
(ZIP)Click here for additional data file.
Overview of examined dogs and results.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Linkage and homozygosity data.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Public genome accessions of 214 dogs and 8 wolves.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Private variants in the genome of the affected Standard Schnauzer no.2.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
TSEN54:c.371G>A genotypes of 627 dogs from 72 different dog breeds.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.7 Aug 2019* Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. *Dear Dr Leeb,Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'TSEN54 missense variant in Standard Schnauzers with leukodystrophy' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic but identified some aspects of the manuscript that should be improved.We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.In addition we ask that you:1) Provide a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.2) Upload a Striking Image with a corresponding caption to accompany your manuscript if one is available (either a new image or an existing one from within your manuscript). If this image is judged to be suitable, it may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel square images. For examples, please browse our archive. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Note: we cannot publish copyrighted images.We hope to receive your revised manuscript within the next 30 days. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we would ask you to let us know the expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.If present, accompanying reviewer attachments should be included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.To resubmit, you will need to go to the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.[LINK]Please let us know if you have any questions while making these revisions.Yours sincerely,Gregory S. BarshEditor-in-ChiefPLOS GeneticsGregory CopenhaverEditor-in-ChiefPLOS GeneticsReviewer's Responses to QuestionsComments to the Authors:Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.Reviewer #1: review is uploaded as an attachment.Reviewer #2: The authors report a novel autosomal recessive trait in Standard Schnauzers characterized by myelin loss primarily in the centrum semiovale. Histologically, they demonstrate that the lesions are predominantly demyelination with gliosis, macrophage/microglia activation and some evidence of axonal damage, Using linkage and homozygousity mapping, they identified critical intervals for the causal allele. A whole genome sequence of an affected dog was filtered for private homozygous variants not found in control WGS predicted to alter protein function. A highly conserved variant in the TSEN54 gene was the only variant to fit those criteria. That variant was concordant with the disease phenotype in the families. It was not common in DNA from a wider sample of Standard Schnauzers and not found in a random sampling of DNA from other breeds. Immunohistochemistry did not demonstrate any difference in distribution or intensity of TSEN54 signal between affected and control dogs.The data show a strong association between the variant and the disease phenotype. The authors, however, are unable to demonstrate a functional effect of the variant with the studies performed and the biological function of the protein does not provide a compelling explanation for the pathogenesis of the limited demyelination seen in the dogs. TSEN54 variants have been associated with a different neurodevelopmental phenotype in humans which could just represent species difference, but again does not provide compelling evidence for causality. The authors appropriately recognize that they cannot rule out the possibility that the variant is a tightly linked benign variant. None-the-less, this study should stimulate further study of the gene’s role in myelination and could lead to improved understanding of the maintenance of myelin during development. Even if it does prove to be an unrelated linked marker, a DNA test will allow breeders to use wise breeding strategies to reduce the risk of the disease in the breed.**********Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics
data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.Reviewer #1: YesReviewer #2: Yes**********PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.Reviewer #1: NoReviewer #2: NoSubmitted filename: ECG comments 2019.07.22.docxClick here for additional data file.4 Sep 2019Submitted filename: MS_Stoerk__R1_Response_to_Reviewers__v02.pdfClick here for additional data file.10 Sep 2019Dear Dr Leeb,We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "TSEN54 missense variant in Standard Schnauzers with leukodystrophy" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!Yours sincerely,Gregory S. BarshEditor-in-ChiefPLOS GeneticsGregory CopenhaverEditor-in-ChiefPLOS Geneticswww.plosgenetics.orgTwitter: @PLOSGenetics----------------------------------------------------Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):----------------------------------------------------Data DepositionIf you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly:http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-19-00985R1More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.----------------------------------------------------Press QueriesIf you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.27 Sep 2019PGENETICS-D-19-00985R1TSEN54 missense variant in Standard Schnauzers with leukodystrophyDear Dr Leeb,We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "TSEN54 missense variant in Standard Schnauzers with leukodystrophy" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!With kind regards,Kaitlin ButlerPLOS GeneticsOn behalf of:The PLOS Genetics TeamCarlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdomplosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics
Authors: Paul R Kasher; Yasmin Namavar; Paula van Tijn; Kees Fluiter; Aleksander Sizarov; Maarten Kamermans; Andrew J Grierson; Danica Zivkovic; Frank Baas Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Millan S Patel; Laurence E Becker; Ants Toi; Dawna L Armstrong; David Chitayat Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Birgit S Budde; Yasmin Namavar; Peter G Barth; Bwee Tien Poll-The; Gudrun Nürnberg; Christian Becker; Fred van Ruissen; Marian A J Weterman; Kees Fluiter; Erik T te Beek; Eleonora Aronica; Marjo S van der Knaap; Wolfgang Höhne; Mohammad Reza Toliat; Yanick J Crow; Maja Steinling; Thomas Voit; Filip Roelenso; Wim Brussel; Knut Brockmann; Marten Kyllerman; Eugen Boltshauser; Gerhard Hammersen; Michèl Willemsen; Lina Basel-Vanagaite; Ingeborg Krägeloh-Mann; Linda S de Vries; Laszlo Sztriha; Francesco Muntoni; Colin D Ferrie; Roberta Battini; Raoul C M Hennekam; Eugenio Grillo; Frits A Beemer; Loes M E Stoets; Bernd Wollnik; Peter Nürnberg; Frank Baas Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Anina Bauer; Vidhya Jagannathan; Sandra Högler; Barbara Richter; Neil A McEwan; Anne Thomas; Edouard Cadieu; Catherine André; Marjo K Hytönen; Hannes Lohi; Monika M Welle; Petra Roosje; Cathryn Mellersh; Margret L Casal; Tosso Leeb Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Vishal D Murthy; Ehren McLarty; Kevin D Woolard; Rell L Parker; Gregg Kortz; Jamie N King; Robert H Poppenga; Marguerite F Knipe; Peter J Dickinson Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-04-26