| Literature DB >> 31582783 |
N Rossi1,2, S Benitez-Vieyra3, A Cocucci3, M Chiaraviglio4,5, G Cardozo4,5.
Abstract
Colors are important vehicles for social signals in many taxa. In Squamata, previous studies have linked color characteristics and chromatic diversity to sexual selection and, particularly, species showing male-biased body size dimorphism also showed male-biased dichromatism and color diversity. Sexual dichromatism may occur in body regions used for conspecific communication and it may be expressed at wavelengths, such as ultraviolet, easily perceivable by conspecifics. We tested this prediction in a social lizard model, Tropidurus spinulosus, using spectrophotometry and visual modelling which enable colors to be interpreted as the individuals of the same taxon see them. Our results indicate that sexual dichromatism occurs in the ventral regions and the flanks, which are the body regions involved in sexual displays. Males show greater color diversity, having larger color volumes and more contrasting colors. These findings reinforce the idea that sexual selection towards males is coupled with the evolution of male-biased, diverse, coloration which could act as a signal in social reproductive contexts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31582783 PMCID: PMC6776660 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50712-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Male (a) and female (b) of Tropidurus spinulosus.
Sexual dichromatism for each body region by cluster analysis in Tropidurus spinulosus.
| Tree clust | dS | dL | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JND | %tot | %within | %males | JND | %tot | %within | %males | ||
| Abdomen | 2 | 5.91 | 47 | 100 | 100 | 3.87 | 20 | 95 | 100 |
| Chest | 3 | 3 | 10 | 100 | 53 | 2.13 | 39 | 97 | 58 |
| Cloaca | 3 | 2.49 | 24 | 100 | 100 | 1.89 | 14 | 75 | 0 |
| Dorsum | 0 | 3.69 | 7 | 89 | 0 | 2.80 | 2 | 54 | 0 |
| Flanks | 2 | 5.53 | 11 | 100 | 100 | 2.03 | 3 | 50 | 0 |
| Head | 0 | 3.88 | 6 | 57 | 0 | 5.60 | 9.60 | 63 | 0 |
| Limbs | 0 | 3.16 | 4.2 | 68 | 0 | 1.93 | 11.55 | 67.30 | 0 |
| Mouth | 0 | 3.72 | 0.6 | 100 | 0 | 3.46 | 2 | 63 | 0 |
| Head profile | 0 | 7.76 | 0.8 | 100 | 0 | 3.30 | 3.60 | 50 | 0 |
| Throat | 2 | 4.89 | 42 | 95 | 100 | 2.46 | 3.70 | 75 | 0 |
The final tree with the total number of clusters where dichromatism was found is reported in the column “Tree clust”; in all body regions only one cluster was dichromatic, and male-specific. Those regions that did not show dichromatism were classified as 0. Columns “JND”, “%tot” and “%within” stand for the three criteria for a cluster to be considered numerically relevant within the region and sex specific: “JND” is the mean difference in JND between the significant cluster and the rest of the clusters of the tree, which should be higher than 2 to be considered visually discernible. “%tot” represents the percentage of the sampled points included in the significant cluster considering the total for the region of interest, which should be higher than 10%. “%within” represents the internal composition of the significant cluster and the percentage of points belonging to one of the two sexes, and should be higher than 90%. “%males” indicates the percentage of males that contributed with their spectra to the significant cluster.
Color diversity and UV indices of the tetrahedrons of males and females.
| Color volume | Hue disparity mean | Hue disparity var | Color span mean | Color span var | UV.centroid | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male |
| Abdomen | 1.19E-06 |
| 7.54E-02 |
| 2.85E-03 |
| 1.38E-02 |
| 5.25E-05 |
|
| 7.00E-02 |
| Chest | 9.17E-08 |
| 4.54E-02 |
| 9.20E-04 |
| 8.94E-03 |
| 2.12E-05 |
|
| 1.26E-01 |
| Cloaca | 2.15E-06 |
| 1.10E-01 |
| 5.85E-03 |
| 1.75E-02 |
| 9.56E-05 |
|
| 1.12E-01 |
| Dorsum | 6.39E-06 |
| 1.29E-01 |
| 1.34E-02 | 2.36E-02 | 2.35E-02 |
| 2.30E-04 |
| 1.38E-01 | 1.42E-01 |
| Flanks | 2.41E-05 |
| 2.12E-01 |
| 3.72E-02 | 3.14E-02 | 2.81E-02 |
| 4.30E-04 |
| 1.49E-01 | 1.35E-01 |
| Head | 1.84E-05 | 2.16E-05 | 2.08E-01 | 2.06E-01 | 9.37E-02 | 4.58E-02 | 3.80E-02 | 4.26E-02 | 1.24E-03 | 8.49E-04 | 1.16E-01 | 1.14E-01 |
| Limbs | 6.06E-06 | 8.52E-06 | 2.18E-01 | 2.15E-01 | 7.18E-02 | 5.85E-02 | 3.05E-02 | 3.07E-02 | 6.46E-04 | 5.18E-04 | 1.46E-01 | 1.46E-01 |
| Mouth | 2.47E-06 | 5.77E-06 | 2.23E-01 | 2.01E-01 | 3.63E-02 | 2.08E-02 | 2.55E-02 | 2.83E-02 | 2.88E-04 | 3.43E-04 | 1.68E-01 | 1.68E-01 |
| Head profile (Profhead) | 2.68E-05 |
| 2.44E-01 | 2.71E-01 | 6.08E-02 | 5.36E-02 | 4.00E-02 | 4.62E-02 | 6.58E-04 | 9.74E-04 | 1.39E-01 | 1.36E-01 |
| Throat | 2.42E-06 |
| 9.55E-02 |
| 4.51E-03 |
| 1.92E-02 |
| 1.25E-04 |
|
| 6.93E-02 |
Values highlighted in bold represent the sex with a higher and statistically significant mean (randomization procedure). The “uv.centroid” reflects the relative stimulation of the UV cones of N.sagrei visual system. Tetrahedrons color volume (“rel.c.vol”), color span mean and variance (“colspan.m”;“colspan.v”) and Hue disparity mean and variance (“huedisp.m”; “huedisp.v”) follow the Stoddard and Plum (2008) procedure.
Figure 2Pictures of T. spinulosus showing visible and ultraviolet wavelengths for each of the three regions (dorsal, lateral, ventral) for both females (visible: A–C; ultraviolet: D–F) and males (visible: G–I; ultraviolet: J–L). Pictures were taken after the spectrophotometric measurements, lizards were put in plastic containers for 10 minutes to acclimate at room temperature (25 °C). A Nikon D70 equipped with a Nikon 60 mm macro lens mounted on a tripod was used to take visible pictures, to which a B + W 403 UV-pass filter was fitted to take UV pictures. Lizards were placed in a plastic container with the surface covered by black poly-ethilvinilacetate, a spectrally flat material; photos were taken in a dark room to avoid infrared contamination. Light sources for visible photographs were provided by two led lamps (Sica bulb 7 W) mounted on tripods and pointed at 130° towards the ceiling and away from the subject to avoid burnt pixels. A black UV-A tube (Blacklite Fluorescent Fixture) was used as a UV source. As the tube had low UV output we decided to point it directly towards the subject; UV irradiation was brief and did not harm the animals involved in the study. Visible-wavelength pictures were taken at ISO 400, 2 seconds shutter speed and f-16; whereas UV pictures were taken at ISO 400, 15 seconds shutter speed and f-16. Pictures from the camera were cropped with the open source software GIMP[77].
Sampled body regions and their role in conspecific communication.
| Body region | Rationale | Displays in | N° spectra taken |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abdomen | Ventral coloration is important in many Squamata species to convey sexual signals, e.g. in females it may indicate reproductive status[ | Push-ups: males show proximal ventral regions when patrolling their territory (NR, unpublished data) | 16 |
| Chest | In some species it can be used to convey sexual signals, and is shown during pushup displays[ | 8 | |
| Throat | Throat coloration is used to convey sexual signals in many species, both in females[ | 16 | |
| Cloaca | The cloacal region is involved in some sexual behaviours (licking[ | Tail whipping: Shown by females during courtship[ | 16 |
| Dorsum | In some species, male dorsal coloration may provide social status signals[ | No displays in | 42 |
| Flanks | Together with the ventral region, this is one of the most important parts in lizard sexual and social communication[ | 84 | |
| Head | Reproductive coloration extends to this region in males of some species[ | No displays in | 20 |
| Legs | Many lizard species use legs to communicate (waving[ | No displays in | 16 |
| Mouth | This can be used as an “advertisement” for male bite force[ | 10 | |
| Head Profile (Profhead) | Male nuptial coloration is shown in this region and it is clearly visible in many displays[ | 20 |
“N° spectra taken” reports the final number of spectra taken in each body region for each individual.