| Literature DB >> 31582774 |
Apiporn T Suwannatrai1,2, Kavin Thinkhamrop3,4, Archie C A Clements3,5, Matthew Kelly3, Kulwadee Suwannatrai6, Bandit Thinkhamrop4, Narong Khuntikeo7,8, Darren J Gray3, Kinley Wangdi3.
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a malignant neoplasm of the biliary tract. Thailand reports the highest incidence of CCA in the world. The aim of this study was to map the distribution of CCA and identify spatial disease clusters in Northeast Thailand. Individual-level data of patients with histopathologically confirmed CCA, aggregated at the sub-district level, were obtained from the Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP) between February 2013 and December 2017. For analysis a multivariate Zero-inflated, Poisson (ZIP) regression model was developed. This model incorporated a conditional autoregressive (CAR) prior structure, with posterior parameters estimated using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation with Gibbs sampling. Covariates included in the models were age, sex, normalized vegetation index (NDVI), and distance to water body. There was a total of 1,299 cases out of 358,981 participants. CCA incidence increased 2.94 fold (95% credible interval [CrI] 2.62-3.31) in patients >60 years as compared to ≤60 years. Males were 2.53 fold (95% CrI: 2.24-2.85) more likely to have CCA when compared to females. CCA decreased with a 1 unit increase of NDVI (Relative Risk =0.06; 95% CrI: 0.01-0.63). When posterior means were mapped spatial clustering was evident after accounting for the model covariates. Age, sex and environmental variables were associated with an increase in the incidence of CCA. When these covariates were included in models the maps of the posterior means of the spatially structured random effects demonstrated evidence of spatial clustering.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31582774 PMCID: PMC6776517 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50476-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Study participants and CCA cases.
Figure 2Map of the raw standardized morbidity ratios (SMRs) for cholangiocarcinoma across sub-district level in Northeast Thailand, 2013–2017.
Figure 3Spatial distributions of the posterior means of random effects for cholangiocarcinoma in Northeast Thailand in Model III. (A) Spatially structured random effects (B) unstructured random effects.
Figure 4Map of Northeast Thailand and neighboring countries.
Figure 5Significance map of posterior means of random effects of cholangiocarcinoma in Northeast Thailand. (A) Spatially structured random effects (B) unstructured random effects.
Percentage of cholangiocarcinoma cases according to sex and age groups.
| Variables | Participants (%) | Number of CCA cases | Percentage (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over all | 358,981 | 1,299 | 0.36 (0.34–0.38) |
|
| |||
| Female | 219,666 (61.20) | 461 | 0.21 (0.19–0.23) |
| Male | 139,274 (38.80) | 838 | 0.60 (0.56–0.64) |
|
| |||
| ≤60 | 262,883 (73.80) | 616 | 0.23 (0.22–0.25) |
| >60 | 93,478 (26.2) | 683 | 0.73 (0.68–0.79) |
Cholangiocarcinoma cases stratified by age and sex.
| Sex | Age in years | Participants | Number of CCA | Percentage (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | ≤60 | 167,200 | 229 | 0.14 (0.12–0.15) |
| >60 | 50,841 | 232 | 0.46 (0.40–0.51) | |
| Male | ≤60 | 95,670 | 387 | 0.40 (0.36–0.44) |
| >60 | 42,635 | 451 | 1.06 (0.96–1.15) |
Regression coefficients, RRs and 95% CrI from Bayesian spatial and non-spatial models for cholangiocarcinoma in Northeast Thailand. Note. *Age ≤ 60 years was reference. **Female sex was reference. ***Best fit model. Key: CrI = credible intervals; RR = relative risks; DIC = deviance information criterion.
| Model/variables | Coefficient, posterior mean (95% CrI) | RR, posterior mean (95% CrI) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| α (Intercept) | −7.21 (−7.39–7.04) | |
| Age* | 1.08 (0.97–1.20) | 2.96 (2.62–3.32) |
| Sex** | 0.93 (0.81–1.05) | 2.54 (2.25–2.87) |
| NDVI (Unit) | −0.30 (−0.43–0.17) | 0.02 (0.004–0.11) |
| Distance to water body (Km) | −0.20 (−0.34–0.06) | 0.82 (0.72–0.94) |
| Heterogeneity | ||
| Structured (variance) | — | — |
| Unstructured (variance) | 0.22 (0.19–0.26) | — |
| DIC | 7198.44 | |
|
| ||
| α (Intercept) | −7.14 (−7.30–6.98) | |
| Age* | 1.08 (0.96–1.19) | 2.93 (2.61–3.29) |
| Sex** | 0.93 (0.81–1.05) | 2.53 (2.25–2.85) |
| NDVI (Unit) | −0.19 (−0.38–0.01) | 0.10 (0.01–1.16) |
| Distance to water body (Km) | −0.02 (−0.16–0.12) | 0.98 (0.86–1.12) |
| Heterogeneity | ||
| Structured (variance) | 0.08 (0.07–0.09) | — |
| Unstructured (variance) | — | — |
| DIC | 7051.19 | |
|
| ||
| α (Intercept) | −7.15 (−7.33–6.99) | |
| Age* | 1.08 (0.96–1.20) | 2.94 (2.62–3.31) |
| Sex** | 0.93 (0.81–1.05) | 2.53 (2.24–2.85) |
| NDVI (Unit) | −0.22 (−0.41–0.04) | 0.06 (0.01–0.63) |
| Distance to water body (Km) | −0.02 (−0.16–0.11) | 0.98 (0.86–1.12) |
| Heterogeneity | ||
| Structured (variance) | 0.12 (0.10–0.17) | — |
| Unstructured (variance) | 1.00 (0.63–1.72) | — |
| DIC | 7016.86*** | |