| Literature DB >> 28182726 |
Kefyalew Addis Alene1,2, Kerri Viney1, Emma S McBryde3,4,5, Archie C A Clements1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the geographical distribution of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in high TB burden countries such as Ethiopia is crucial for effective control of TB epidemics in these countries, and thus globally. We present the first spatial analysis of multidrug resistant tuberculosis, and its relationship to socio-economic, demographic and household factors in northwest Ethiopia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28182726 PMCID: PMC5300134 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of the study area, northwest Ethiopia.
Fig 2Choropleth map showing the geographical distribution of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis standardized morbidity ratios across each district in the northwest Ethiopia, 2010 to 2015.
Fig 3Spatial clustering of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis incidence in northwest Ethiopia, 2010 to 2015, based on: a) Local indicators of spatial association using Anselin Local Moran’s I statistic; and b) and the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic.
A multivariable fixed effects Poisson regression model of socio-economic and demographic factors influencing district-level incidence of multidrug resistant tuberculosis per 100,000 population in northwest Ethiopia, 2010 to 2015.
| Variables | Coefficients | Relative risk (95%CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population density per square kilometre | 0.01 | 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) | 0.001 |
| Economically inactive population (%) | 0.05 | 1.05 (1.03, 1.07) | <0.001 |
| Migrant population (%) | 0.001 | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) | 0.887 |
| Male population (%) | 0.46 | 1.58 (1.26, 1.99) | 0.01 |
| Urban residence (%) | 0.02 | 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) | 0.03 |
*Confidence interval.
Poisson regression model for the association of socio-economic, demographic, housing condition and spatially structured random effect at the district level with cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in northwest Ethiopia, 2010 to 2015.
| Model I: unstructured | Model II: structured | Model III: structured & unstructured | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Coefficient, posterior mean (95% CrI | RR | Coefficient, posterior mean (95% CrI | RR | Coefficient, posterior mean (95% CrI | RR |
| α (Intercept) | -1.2 (-1.67,-0.78) | -1.20 (-1.52,-0.90) | -1.21(-1.66, -0.81) | |||
| Male (%) | ||||||
| Urban residence (%) | ||||||
| Population density | 0.19 (-0.23, 0.62) | 1.24 (0.79, 1.87) | 0.18 (-0.35, 0.71) | 1.24 (0.70, 2.04) | 0.19 (-0.28, 0.66) | 1.24 (0.76, 1.94) |
| Migrants (%) | -0.10 (-0.55, 0.34) | 0.93 (0.58, 1.41) | -0.26 (-0.72, 0.20) | 0.79 (0.49, 1.22) | -0.14 (-0.61, 0.32) | 0.90 (0.54, 1.38) |
| Economically inactive (%) | -0.15 (-0.53, 0.23) | 0.87 (0.59, 1.26) | -0.17 (-0.58, 0.26) | 0.87 (0.56, 1.29) | -0.15 (-0.53, 0.27) | 0.88 (0.59, 1.31) |
| Heterogeneity | ||||||
| Unstructured variance | 1.06 (0.57, 2.29) | - | 0.03 (0.002, 2.18) | |||
| Structured variance | - | 3.70 (1.96, 8.33) | 0.008 (0.001, 5.56) | |||
| DIC | 561.7 | 568.5 | 564.1 | |||
aCredible interval,
brelative risk,
cdeviance information criterion,
dpopulation density per square kilometer
Fig 4Choropleth maps showing the geographical distribution of the percentage of the district (a) who are male and (b) who live in urban communities across northwest Ethiopia, 2010 to 2015.