Literature DB >> 31582460

Coastal Ocean Metagenomes and Curated Metagenome-Assembled Genomes from Marsh Landing, Sapelo Island (Georgia, USA).

Julian Damashek1, Christian F Edwardson2, Bradley B Tolar2, Scott M Gifford3, Mary Ann Moran2, James T Hollibaugh2.   

Abstract

Microbes play a dominant role in the biogeochemistry of coastal waters, which receive organic matter from diverse sources. We present metagenomes and 45 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from Sapelo Island, Georgia, to further understand coastal microbial populations. Notably, four MAGs are archaea, with two Thaumarchaeota and two marine group II Euryarchaeota.
Copyright © 2019 Damashek et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31582460      PMCID: PMC6776777          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00934-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Coastal oceans receive carbon and nutrients from rivers and marshes, driving high productivity. The metabolism of coastal microbes largely determines how much of the resulting organic matter (OM) is exported (1). Metagenomic data can provide insights into how microbial diversity relates to metabolic potential and drives OM processing (2). Coastal microbial biogeochemistry has been well studied at Sapelo Island, Georgia (3–5). Furthermore, these waters host a summer “bloom” of Thaumarchaeota and have been studied extensively to understand thaumarchaeal ecology (e.g., references 6–9). The metagenomic data presented here will guide an understanding of the microbial taxa in these waters and complement existing data for the same communities. Seawater was collected at Marsh Landing (31°25′4.08″N, 81°17′34.26″W) as part of the Sapelo Island Microbial Carbon Observatory (http://www.simco.uga.edu/) by filtering through a 3.0-μm-pore-size prefilter and a 0.2-μm-pore-size Supor filter (Pall), which was frozen in liquid nitrogen (10). Duplicate filters were collected in August 2008 and 2009, 1 h before both day and night high tide on consecutive days (11). DNA extraction was done using the PowerSoil kit (Mo Bio), as described previously (7). DNA was sheared to ∼225 bp, and libraries were constructed with the TruSeq DNA kit (Illumina) at the Georgia Genomics and Bioinformatics Core. Replicates from day and night samples on consecutive days were pooled to make 4 libraries (08N, 08D, 09N, and 09D; see Table 1), which were sequenced on 25% of an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform rapid lane (paired-end, 150-bp reads) at the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology.
TABLE 1

Sampling, pooling, and quality control of metagenomic libraries

LibrarySRA BioSample no.Pooled samples (filter IDs)a Samples, collection date (mo/day/year), collection timeb No. of raw readsNo. of high-quality reads, with adapters removedNo. of trimmed readsNo. of paired reads
08DSAMN12211998FN64, FN65, FN74, FN75FN64 and FN65, 8/6/08, 11:47; FN74 and FN75, 8/7/08, 11:035,569,5515,393,7584,496,3403,590,532
08NSAMN12212006FN59, FN60, FN69, FN70FN59 and FN60, 8/6/08, 00:15; FN69 and FN70, 8/7/08, 00:506,495,0986,266,1985,284,0705,005,127
09DSAMN12212021FN143, FN144, FN153, FN154FN143 and FN144, 8/12/09, 11:26; FN153 and FN154, 8/13/09, 13:596,258,0536,028,2265,049,3334,240,004
09NSAMN12212029FN148, FN149, FN159, FN160FN148 and FN149, 8/13/09, 01:14; FN159 and FN160, 8/14/09, 02:306,324,1846,090,0865,084,5474,444,614
Total24,646,88623,778,26819,914,29017,280,277

IDs, identifiers.

For sampling details, see Gifford et al. (11).

Sampling, pooling, and quality control of metagenomic libraries IDs, identifiers. For sampling details, see Gifford et al. (11). Default software parameters were used, unless otherwise stated. The reads had adapters removed with Trim Galore (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore), were trimmed with PRINSEQ v.0.20.4 (12), and were joined using PEAR v.0.9.10 (13), using parameters described previously (14) (Table 1). Paired and high-quality orphaned/singleton reads were coassembled using metaSPAdes (“--meta”) within SPAdes v.3.7.0 (15), producing 83,626 contigs of >1,000 bp (N50, 718 bp; L50, 152,728; calculated with QUAST v.4.2 [16]). Reads were mapped and indexed using Bowtie2 v.2.2.9 (17) and SAMtools v.1.3.1 (18), and contigs of >2.5 kbp (n = 18,714) were binned using anvi’o v.3 (19), following published protocols (20) (http://merenlab.org/data/tara-oceans-mags/). An anvi’o contig database was built to calculate k-mer frequencies, determine genes using Prodigal v.2.6.3 (21), and identify single-copy genes (22, 23) using HMMER v.3.1b2 (24). Bins generated by CONCOCT v.1.0.0 (25) were refined using the anvi’o interactive interface (26). Completeness and redundancy were assessed using anvi’o and CheckM v.1.0.12 (27); bins with <10% redundancy and ≥50% completeness were rerefined to minimize redundancy. Their resulting completeness and redundancy were estimated using anvi’o, CheckM, and the Microbial Genome Atlas (MiGA) Web server (28) (last accessed 18 August 2018). The resulting bins with completion of ≥50% were considered metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs; n = 45) and were taxonomically annotated with MiGA. MAGs annotated below the order (genus) level included Thaumarchaeota (Nitrosopumilus spp., n = 2), marine group II Euryarchaeota (n = 2), Synechococcaceae (strain WH 8109, Cyanobium sp., n = 2), Rhodobacteraceae (Phaeobacter spp., n = 5), Pelagibacteraceae (n = 2), Flavobacteriia (n = 3), Acidimicrobiaceae (Ilumatobacter spp., n = 2), and Halieaceae (n = 1) (see https://figshare.com/articles/SIMO_MAG_table_v2/9791465/1).

Data availability.

The reads, coassembly, and MAGs were deposited under GenBank BioProject number PRJNA552566. The reads are under SRA accession numbers SRX6421373 to SRX6421376. The coassembly and MAGs are under whole-genome sequencing (WGS) project numbers VMBT00000000 to VMDM00000000.
  25 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of a deeply sequenced marine microbial metatranscriptome.

Authors:  Scott M Gifford; Shalabh Sharma; Johanna M Rinta-Kanto; Mary Ann Moran
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Metatranscriptomic analysis of ammonia-oxidizing organisms in an estuarine bacterioplankton assemblage.

Authors:  James T Hollibaugh; Scott Gifford; Shalabh Sharma; Nasreen Bano; Mary Ann Moran
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter.

Authors:  Christian Rinke; Patrick Schwientek; Alexander Sczyrba; Natalia N Ivanova; Iain J Anderson; Jan-Fang Cheng; Aaron Darling; Stephanie Malfatti; Brandon K Swan; Esther A Gies; Jeremy A Dodsworth; Brian P Hedlund; George Tsiamis; Stefan M Sievert; Wen-Tso Liu; Jonathan A Eisen; Steven J Hallam; Nikos C Kyrpides; Ramunas Stepanauskas; Edward M Rubin; Philip Hugenholtz; Tanja Woyke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Seasonal variation in the metatranscriptomes of a Thaumarchaeota population from SE USA coastal waters.

Authors:  James T Hollibaugh; Scott M Gifford; Mary Ann Moran; Meredith J Ross; Shalabh Sharma; Bradley B Tolar
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  UGA is an additional glycine codon in uncultured SR1 bacteria from the human microbiota.

Authors:  James H Campbell; Patrick O'Donoghue; Alisha G Campbell; Patrick Schwientek; Alexander Sczyrba; Tanja Woyke; Dieter Söll; Mircea Podar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Leucine incorporation and its potential as a measure of protein synthesis by bacteria in natural aquatic systems.

Authors:  D Kirchman; E K'nees; R Hodson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Bacterial carbon processing by generalist species in the coastal ocean.

Authors:  Xiaozhen Mou; Shulei Sun; Robert A Edwards; Robert E Hodson; Mary Ann Moran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition.

Authors:  Johannes Alneberg; Brynjar Smári Bjarnason; Ino de Bruijn; Melanie Schirmer; Joshua Quick; Umer Z Ijaz; Leo Lahti; Nicholas J Loman; Anders F Andersson; Christopher Quince
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Metatranscriptomic analysis of prokaryotic communities active in sulfur and arsenic cycling in Mono Lake, California, USA.

Authors:  Christian F Edwardson; James T Hollibaugh
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  Identifying contamination with advanced visualization and analysis practices: metagenomic approaches for eukaryotic genome assemblies.

Authors:  Tom O Delmont; A Murat Eren
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  2 in total

1.  Generation and application of pseudo-long reads for metagenome assembly.

Authors:  Mikang Sim; Jongin Lee; Suyeon Wy; Nayoung Park; Daehwan Lee; Daehong Kwon; Jaebum Kim
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 7.658

2.  Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals role of iron metabolism in drought-induced rhizosphere microbiome dynamics.

Authors:  Ling Xu; Zhaobin Dong; Dawn Chiniquy; Grady Pierroz; Siwen Deng; Cheng Gao; Spencer Diamond; Tuesday Simmons; Heidi M-L Wipf; Daniel Caddell; Nelle Varoquaux; Mary A Madera; Robert Hutmacher; Adam Deutschbauer; Jeffery A Dahlberg; Mary Lou Guerinot; Elizabeth Purdom; Jillian F Banfield; John W Taylor; Peggy G Lemaux; Devin Coleman-Derr
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.