Literature DB >> 31580097

Level of personality functioning as a predictor of psychosocial functioning-Concurrent validity of criterion A.

Tore Buer Christensen1, Ingeborg Eikenaes2, Benjamin Hummelen2, Geir Pedersen2, Tor-Erik Nysæter1, Donna S Bender3, Andrew E Skodol4, Sara Germans Selvik4.   

Abstract

The alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), defines personality functioning by assessment of impairment in Identity and Self-direction (Self component) and in Empathy and Intimacy (Interpersonal). These four domains constitute the Level of Personality Functioning Scale, a trans-diagnostic measure of PD severity. The association between the Level of Personality Functioning Scale and psychosocial impairment based on other previously established psychosocial functioning instruments has not been reported. A total of 317 individuals, including a representative clinical sample of 282 patients (192 with a personality disorder [PD] diagnosis), was evaluated with the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 AMPD Module I. Self-reported impairment was measured by the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), and social and occupational impairment was assessed by the functioning score of the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF-F). WSAS and GAF-F both correlated significantly with mean LPFS scores and the sum of DSM-IV PD criteria. For both measures, the mean LPFS was a stronger predictor for psychosocial impairment than the sum of DSM-IV PD criteria. Within the LPFS, the Self component was a better predictor than the Interpersonal component for both WSAS and GAF-F. For the four domains, the results diverged, with Identity as the strongest predictor by far for WSAS. Empathy was the only significant predictor for impairment evaluated by GAF-F, but its contribution to variance was not substantial. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31580097     DOI: 10.1037/per0000352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Personal Disord        ISSN: 1949-2723


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Neurobiological principles of borderline personality disorder: integration into the ICD-11 model of personality disorders].

Authors:  Katja Bertsch; Sabine C Herpertz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Predicting smoking and nicotine dependence from the DSM-5 alternative model for personality pathology.

Authors:  Alexandra L Halberstadt; Carillon J Skrzynski; Aidan G C Wright; Kasey G Creswell
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2021-03-11

3.  Lived Experience of Treatment for Avoidant Personality Disorder: Searching for Courage to Be.

Authors:  Kristine Dahl Sørensen; Theresa Wilberg; Eivind Berthelsen; Marit Råbu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-17

4.  A Proposed Classification of ICD-11 Severity Degrees of Personality Pathology Using the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale.

Authors:  Dominick Gamache; Claudia Savard; Philippe Leclerc; Maude Payant; Nicolas Berthelot; Alexandre Côté; Jonathan Faucher; Mireille Lampron; Roxanne Lemieux; Kristel Mayrand; Marie-Chloé Nolin; Marc Tremblay
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Criteria A and B of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) Capture Borderline Personality Features Among Adolescents.

Authors:  Rasa Barkauskienė; Elena Gaudiešiūtė; Asta Adler; Lina Gervinskaitė-Paulaitienė; Alfredas Laurinavičius; Gabrielė Skabeikytė-Norkienė
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Differences in personality functioning impairment in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders: a cluster analysis.

Authors:  Nikola Doubková; Radek Heissler; Marek Preiss; Edel Sanders
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.144

7.  The interplay of Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, mentalization and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jeff Maerz; Anna Buchheim; Luna Rabl; David Riedl; Roberto Viviani; Karin Labek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-25

8.  Level of Structural Integration and Its Association with Intersession Experiences and Outcomes: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Thorsten-Christian Gablonski; Birgit Senft; Sylke Andreas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Levels of Structural Integration Mediate the Impact of Metacognition on Functioning in Non-affective Psychosis: Adding a Psychodynamic Perspective to the Metacognitive Approach.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Bröcker; Samuel Bayer; Frauke Stuke; Sandra Just; Gianna Bertram; Jakob Funcke; Imke Grimm; Günter Lempa; Dorothea von Haebler; Christiane Montag
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.