Literature DB >> 24430578

Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair using polypropylene mesh fixed with sutures vs. self-fixating polypropylene mesh: a prospective randomized comparative study.

G Chatzimavroudis1, B Papaziogas, I Koutelidakis, I Galanis, S Atmatzidis, P Christopoulos, T Doulias, K Atmatzidis, J Makris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chronic postoperative pain is probably the most significant complication of tension-free inguinal hernia repair as its presence can considerably affect the life quality of the patient. Different mesh materials and different surgical techniques for mesh fixation have been applied to reduce chronic postoperative pain, with controversial, nevertheless, results. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the effect of a relatively new mesh with self-fixating properties, used to repair inguinal hernia with the Lichtenstein technique, on early and chronic postoperative pain.
METHODS: Between June 2009 and June 2010, 50 patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were treated using the Lichtenstein technique. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a polypropylene mesh, fixed with polypropylene sutures (n = 25; group A), or a self-fixating polypropylene mesh with resorbable polylactic acid microgrips (n = 25; group B). Demographic data were recorded. Early and chronic postoperative pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). Duration of surgery, complications, length of hospitalization and recurrence were also recorded.
RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the two groups in association to demographic data. Operating time was 53.4 ± 12.5 and 44.4 ± 7.2 min in groups A and B, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). No difference was observed between the groups regarding the postoperative complications. The VAS of early postoperative pain was 1.7 ± 1.9 in group A and 1.3 ± 1.6 in group B, with the difference being not statistically significant (p = 0.21). Concerning chronic pain, no remarkable statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups at 3-month, 1- and 2-year follow-up period. At the end of the study, no recurrence was reported in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-fixating mesh can be safely and effectively used in inguinal hernia repair with the additional advantage of reducing the operative time compared to the classic Lichtenstein technique. However, its use is not accompanied by reduced rates in early or chronic postoperative pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24430578     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1211-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  22 in total

1.  Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex™ ProGrip™ polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months.

Authors:  A Kingsnorth; M Gingell-Littlejohn; S Nienhuijs; S Schüle; P Appel; P Ziprin; A Eklund; M Miserez; S Smeds
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs.

Authors:  Igor Belyansky; Victor B Tsirline; David A Klima; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; Todd B Heniford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure--a prestudy.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Heiko Schulze; Amke Caliebe
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Nerve management during open hernia repair.

Authors:  A R Wijsmuller; R N van Veen; J L Bosch; J F M Lange; G J Kleinrensink; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Randomized comparison of self-fixating and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  G Pierides; T Scheinin; V Remes; K Hermunen; J Vironen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  P J O'Dwyer; A N Kingsnorth; R G Molloy; P K Small; B Lammers; G Horeyseck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Inguinodynia following Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair: a review.

Authors:  Abdul Hakeem; Venkatesh Shanmugam
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Open "tension-free" repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique.

Authors:  P K Amid; A G Shulman; I L Lichtenstein
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-06

10.  Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh.

Authors:  P Chastan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  11 in total

1.  Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  R Gamagami; E Dickens; A Gonzalez; L D'Amico; C Richardson; J Rabaza; R Kolachalam
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Rail or roll: a new, convenient and safe way to position self-gripping meshes in open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M N Lechner; T Jäger; S Buchner; G Köhler; D Öfner; F Mayer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Suture Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: 7-Year Outcome Analysis.

Authors:  M Matikainen; J Kössi; S Silvasti; T Hulmi; H Paajanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institutional, retrospective study.

Authors:  Ramachandra Kolachalam; Eugene Dickens; Lawrence D'Amico; Christopher Richardson; Jorge Rabaza; Reza Gamagami; Anthony Gonzalez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marijke Molegraaf; Johan Lange; Arthur Wijsmuller
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.745

6.  Factors predicting chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a regression analysis of randomized trial comparing three different meshes with three fixation methods (FinnMesh Study).

Authors:  M Matikainen; E Aro; J Vironen; J Kössi; T Hulmi; S Silvasti; I Ilves; M Hertsi; K Mustonen; H Paajanen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using Retrorectus Self-adhering Mesh: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Ibrahim Khansa; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-11-23

9.  Meta-analysis of postoperative pain using non-sutured or sutured single-layer open mesh repair for inguinal hernia.

Authors:  S van Steensel; L K van Vugt; A K Al Omar; E H H Mommers; S O Breukink; L P S Stassen; B Winkens; N D Bouvy
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-02-27

10.  Anterior transversalis fascia approach versus preperitoneal space approach for inguinal hernia repair in residents in northern China: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Qing Fan; De-Wei Zhang; Da-Ye Yang; Hong-Wu Li; Shi-Bo Wei; Liang Yang; Fu-Quan Yang; Shao-Jun Zhang; Yao-Qiang Wu; Wei-de An; Zhong-Shu Dai; Hui-Yong Jiang; Fu-Rong Wang; Shi-Feng Qiao; Hang-Yu Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.