Literature DB >> 31578935

Long-Term Evaluation of Functional Outcomes Following Rat Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury and Repair.

Ellen L Mintz1, Juliana A Passipieri2, Isabelle R Franklin3, Victoria M Toscano2, Emma C Afferton2, Poonam R Sharma2, George J Christ2,4.   

Abstract

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries, by definition, exceed the endogenous repair capacity of skeletal muscle resulting in permanent structural and functional deficits. VML injuries present a significant burden for both civilian and military medicine. Despite progress, there is still considerable room for therapeutic improvement. In this regard, tissue-engineered constructs show promise for VML repair, as they provide an opportunity to introduce both scaffolding and cellular components. We have pioneered the development of a tissue-engineered muscle repair (TEMR) technology created by seeding muscle progenitor cells onto a porcine-derived bladder acellular matrix followed by cyclic stretch preconditioning before implantation. Our work to date has demonstrated significant functional repair (60-90% functional recovery) in progressively larger rodent models of VML injury following TEMR implantation. Notwithstanding this success, TEMR implantation in cylindrically shaped VML injuries in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle was associated with more variable functional outcomes than has been observed in sheet-like muscles such as the latissimus dorsi. In fact, previous observations documented a dichotomy of responses following TEMR implantation in a rodent TA VML injury model; with an ≈61% functional improvement observed in fewer than half (46%) of TEMR-implanted animals at 12 weeks postinjury. This current study builds directly from those observations as we modified the geometry of both the VML injury and the TEMR construct to determine if improved matching of the implanted TEMR construct to the surgically created VML injury resulted in increased functional recovery posttreatment. Following these modifications, we observed a comparable degree of functional improvement in a larger proportion of animals (≈67%) that was durable up to 24 weeks post-TEMR implantation. Moreover, in ≈25% of all TEMR-implanted animals, functional recovery was virtually complete (TEMR max responders), and furthermore, the functional recovery in all 67% of responding animals was accompanied by the presence of native-like muscle properties within the repaired TA muscle, including fiber cross-sectional area, fiber type, vascularization, and innervation. This study emphasizes the importance of tuning the application of tissue engineering technology platforms to the specific requirements of diverse VML injuries to improve functional outcomes. Impact Statement This report confirms and extends previous observations with our implantable tissue-engineered technology platform for repair of volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries. Based on our prior work, we addressed factors hypothesized to be responsible for significant outcome variability following treatment of VML injuries in a rat tibialis anterior model. Through customization of the muscle repair technology to a specific VML injury, we were able to significantly increase the frequency at which functional recovery occurred, and furthermore, demonstrate durability out to 6 months. In addition, the enhanced biomimetic qualities of repaired muscle tissue were associated with the most robust functional outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  skeletal muscle; tissue engineering; volumetric muscle loss; wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31578935      PMCID: PMC7047124          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  59 in total

1.  Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Ricardo Londono; Stephen Tottey; Li Zhang; Kathryn A Kukla; Matthew T Wolf; Kerry A Daly; Janet E Reing; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  A coupled framework of in situ and in silico analysis reveals the role of lateral force transmission in force production in volumetric muscle loss injuries.

Authors:  Amanda M Westman; Sarah E Dyer; J David Remer; Xiao Hu; George J Christ; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  An acellular biologic scaffold promotes skeletal muscle formation in mice and humans with volumetric muscle loss.

Authors:  Brian M Sicari; J Peter Rubin; Christopher L Dearth; Matthew T Wolf; Fabrisia Ambrosio; Michael Boninger; Neill J Turner; Douglas J Weber; Tyler W Simpson; Aaron Wyse; Elke H P Brown; Jenna L Dziki; Lee E Fisher; Spencer Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Mechanisms by which acellular biologic scaffolds promote functional skeletal muscle restoration.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Jenna L Dziki; Brian M Sicari; Fabrisia Ambrosio; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Keratin Hydrogel Enhances In Vivo Skeletal Muscle Function in a Rat Model of Volumetric Muscle Loss.

Authors:  J A Passipieri; H B Baker; Mevan Siriwardane; Mary D Ellenburg; Manasi Vadhavkar; Justin M Saul; Seth Tomblyn; Luke Burnett; George J Christ
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  * Skeletal Myoblast-Seeded Vascularized Tissue Scaffolds in the Treatment of a Large Volumetric Muscle Defect in the Rat Biceps Femoris Muscle.

Authors:  Mon-Tzu Li; Marissa A Ruehle; Hazel Y Stevens; Nick Servies; Nick J Willett; Sukhita Karthikeyakannan; Gordon L Warren; Robert E Guldberg; Laxminarayanan Krishnan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Jolene E Valentin; Ann M Stewart-Akers; George P McCabe; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Rapid release of growth factors regenerates force output in volumetric muscle loss injuries.

Authors:  Jonathan M Grasman; Duc M Do; Raymond L Page; George D Pins
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Bioengineered constructs combined with exercise enhance stem cell-mediated treatment of volumetric muscle loss.

Authors:  Marco Quarta; Melinda Cromie; Robert Chacon; Justin Blonigan; Victor Garcia; Igor Akimenko; Mark Hamer; Patrick Paine; Merel Stok; Joseph B Shrager; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Volumetric muscle loss injury repair using in situ fibrin gel cast seeded with muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs).

Authors:  Nadine Matthias; Samuel D Hunt; Jianbo Wu; Jonathan Lo; Laura A Smith Callahan; Yong Li; Johnny Huard; Radbod Darabi
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.020

View more
  7 in total

1.  Administration of particulate oxygen generators improves skeletal muscle contractile function after ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat hindlimb.

Authors:  Sarah E Dyer; J David Remer; Kelsey E Hannifin; Aishwarya Hombal; Joseph C Wenke; Thomas J Walters; George J Christ
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-01-06

2.  Contusion concomitant with ischemia injury aggravates skeletal muscle necrosis and hinders muscle functional recovery.

Authors:  Peijun Deng; Shuai Qiu; Fawei Liao; Yifei Jiang; Canbin Zheng; Qingtang Zhu
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Photoreactive Hydrogel Stiffness Influences Volumetric Muscle Loss Repair.

Authors:  Ivan M Basurto; Juliana A Passipieri; Gregg M Gardner; Kathryn K Smith; Austin R Amacher; Audrey I Hansrisuk; George J Christ; Steven R Caliari
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.080

4.  Impact of Cell Seeding Density and Cell Confluence on Human Tissue Engineered Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Olga M Wroblewski; Matthew H Nguyen; Paul S Cederna; Lisa M Larkin
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.080

5.  Agent-based model provides insight into the mechanisms behind failed regeneration following volumetric muscle loss injury.

Authors:  Amanda M Westman; Shayn M Peirce; George J Christ; Silvia S Blemker
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Assembled Cell-Decorated Collagen (AC-DC) Fiber Bioprinted Implants with Musculoskeletal Tissue Properties Promote Functional Recovery in Volumetric Muscle Loss.

Authors:  Kyle W Christensen; Jonathan Turner; Kelly Coughenour; Yas Maghdouri-White; Anna A Bulysheva; Olivia Sergeant; Michael Rariden; Alessia Randazzo; Andrew J Sheean; George J Christ; Michael P Francis
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 9.933

7.  Progressing the field of Regenerative Rehabilitation through novel interdisciplinary interaction.

Authors:  Victor Cheuy; Silvia Picciolini; Marzia Bedoni
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2020-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.