Literature DB >> 19121538

Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component.

Bryan N Brown1, Jolene E Valentin, Ann M Stewart-Akers, George P McCabe, Stephen F Badylak.   

Abstract

Recently, macrophages have been characterized as having an M1 or M2 phenotype based on receptor expression, cytokine and effector molecule production, and function. The effects of macrophage phenotype upon tissue remodeling following the implantation of a biomaterial are largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of a cellular component within an implanted extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold upon macrophage phenotype, and to determine the relationship between macrophage phenotype and tissue remodeling. Partial-thickness defects in the abdominal wall musculature of Sprague-Dawley rats were repaired with autologous body wall tissue, acellular allogeneic rat body wall ECM, xenogeneic pig urinary bladder tissue, or acellular xenogeneic pig urinary bladder ECM. At 3, 7, 14, and 28 days the host tissue response was characterized using histologic, immunohistochemical, and RT-PCR methods. The acellular test articles were shown to elicit a predominantly M2 type response and resulted in constructive remodeling, while those containing a cellular component, even an autologous cellular component, elicited a predominantly M1 type response and resulted in deposition of dense connective tissue and/or scarring. We conclude that the presence of cellular material within an ECM scaffold modulates the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response following implantation, and that the phenotype of the macrophages participating in the host response appears to be related to tissue remodeling outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19121538      PMCID: PMC2805023          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  36 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage polarization comes of age.

Authors:  Alberto Mantovani; Antonio Sica; Massimo Locati
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 2.  Immunosenescence and macrophage functional plasticity: dysregulation of macrophage function by age-associated microenvironmental changes.

Authors:  Robert D Stout; Jill Suttles
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study.

Authors:  Jolene E Valentin; John S Badylak; George P McCabe; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  A quantitative method for evaluating the degradation of biologic scaffold materials.

Authors:  Thomas W Gilbert; Ann M Stewart-Akers; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix grafts elicit a TH2-restricted immune response.

Authors:  A J Allman; T B McPherson; S F Badylak; L C Merrill; B Kallakury; C Sheehan; R H Raeder; D W Metzger
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Jolene E Valentin; Anjani K Ravindra; George P McCabe; Ann M Stewart-Akers
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Esophageal reconstruction with ECM and muscle tissue in a dog model.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; David A Vorp; Alan R Spievack; Abby Simmons-Byrd; Joseph Hanke; Donald O Freytes; Anil Thapa; Thomas W Gilbert; Alejandro Nieponice
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Bladder augmentation using allogenic bladder submucosa seeded with cells.

Authors:  J J Yoo; J Meng; F Oberpenning; A Atala
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Biaxial strength of multilaminated extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Donald O Freytes; Stephen F Badylak; Thomas J Webster; Leslie A Geddes; Ann E Rundell
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.708

View more
  257 in total

1.  Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Ricardo Londono; Stephen Tottey; Li Zhang; Kathryn A Kukla; Matthew T Wolf; Kerry A Daly; Janet E Reing; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Right ventricular outflow tract repair with a cardiac biologic scaffold.

Authors:  John M Wainwright; Ryotaro Hashizume; Kazuro L Fujimoto; Nathaniel T Remlinger; Colin Pesyna; William R Wagner; Kimimasa Tobita; Thomas W Gilbert; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.481

3.  Biologic scaffold composed of skeletal muscle extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Kerry A Daly; Janet E Reing; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Proangiogenic scaffolds as functional templates for cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Lauran R Madden; Derek J Mortisen; Eric M Sussman; Sarah K Dupras; James A Fugate; Janet L Cuy; Kip D Hauch; Michael A Laflamme; Charles E Murry; Buddy D Ratner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of three methods for the derivation of a biologic scaffold composed of adipose tissue extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; John M Freund; Li Han; J Peter Rubin; Janet E Reing; Eric M Jeffries; Mathew T Wolf; Stephen Tottey; Christopher A Barnes; Buddy D Ratner; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.056

6.  The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Janet E Reing; Bryan N Brown; Kerry A Daly; John M Freund; Thomas W Gilbert; Susan X Hsiong; Alexander Huber; Karen E Kullas; Stephen Tottey; Matthew T Wolf; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Electrodiagnostic Evaluation of Individuals Implanted With Extracellular Matrix for the Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Injury: Case Series.

Authors:  Nami Han; Mohammad A Yabroudi; Kristen Stearns-Reider; Wendy Helkowski; Brian M Sicari; J Peter Rubin; Stephen F Badylak; Michael L Boninger; Fabrisia Ambrosio
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11-12

Review 8.  Extracellular Matrix-Based Biohybrid Materials for Engineering Compliant, Matrix-Dense Tissues.

Authors:  Laura G Bracaglia; John P Fisher
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 9.933

9.  Esophagus and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Ricardo Londono; Blair A Jobe; Toshitaka Hoppo; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Differential degradation rate and underlying mechanism of a collagen/chitosan complex in subcutis, spinal cord and brain tissues of rat.

Authors:  Feng Fu; Xiang Zhu; Zhe Qin; Jing-Jing Wang; Chao Xu; Li-Na Wang; Yue Tu; Sai Zhang; Rui-Xin Li; Xiao-Hong Li; Ming-Liang Zhao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.