Literature DB >> 31577432

Uptake of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances at the Air-Water Interface.

Charles E Schaefer1, Veronika Culina2, Dung Nguyen2, Jennifer Field3.   

Abstract

Bench-scale experiments were performed to assess uptake of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), both single compounds and mixtures, at the air-water interface. The focus was on evaluating uptake at field-relevant PFAS concentrations (<2 × 10-4 mol m-3 or 0.1 mg L-1), assessing the impacts of various PFAS mixtures, and quantifying the impacts of background NaCl concentrations. Both interfacial tension measurements and direct quantification of PFAS mass sorbed at the air-water interface in water films were used to evaluate PFAS interfacial partitioning. Results showed that a Freundlich-based model, rather than a Langmuir-based model, described perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) interfacial uptake. At lower and field-relevant PFOS and PFOA concentrations, the Langmuir-based model underpredicted interfacial uptake by up to several orders of magnitude. The interfacial partition coefficient, kaw, increased as PFAS concentrations decreased. Results also showed that the interfacial tension and interfacial uptake of PFAS mixtures were (within a factor of 2) predicted based on the single solute systems assuming ideal dilute behavior. Furthermore, the addition of NaCl at concentrations of up to 0.01 M increased PFOS uptake by less than a factor of 2 at field-relevant PFOS concentrations. The results presented herein have important implications for PFAS migration in unsaturated soils as well as for remedial technologies that rely on PFAS interfacial sorption, particularly at field-relevant PFAS concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31577432     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

Review 1.  PFAS Molecules: A Major Concern for the Human Health and the Environment.

Authors:  Emiliano Panieri; Katarina Baralic; Danijela Djukic-Cosic; Aleksandra Buha Djordjevic; Luciano Saso
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-01-18

2.  Limitations of Current Approaches for Predicting Groundwater Vulnerability from PFAS Contamination in the Vadose Zone.

Authors:  Matt Rovero; Diana Cutt; Rachel Griffiths; Urszula Filipowicz; Katherine Mishkin; Brad White; Sandra Goodrow; Richard T Wilkin
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.870

3.  PFAS fluidize synthetic and bacterial lipid monolayers based on hydrophobicity and lipid charge.

Authors:  Aleksandra Naumann; Jessica Alesio; Monika Poonia; Geoffrey D Bothun
Journal:  J Environ Chem Eng       Date:  2022-02-09

4.  US Department of Defense-Funded Fate and Transport Research on Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances at Aqueous Film-Forming Foam-Impacted Sites.

Authors:  Richard H Anderson; Timothy Thompson; Hans F Stroo; Andrea Leeson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Field-Scale Demonstration of PFAS Leachability Following In Situ Soil Stabilization.

Authors:  Jeffrey T McDonough; Richard H Anderson; Johnsie R Lang; David Liles; Kasey Matteson; Theresa Olechiw
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  Ideal versus Nonideal Transport of PFAS in Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Bo Guo; Dandan Huang; Ni Yan; Ying Lyu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 7.  Environmental Sources, Chemistry, Fate, and Transport of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: State of the Science, Key Knowledge Gaps, and Recommendations Presented at the August 2019 SETAC Focus Topic Meeting.

Authors:  Jennifer L Guelfo; Stephen Korzeniowski; Marc A Mills; Janet Anderson; Richard H Anderson; Jennifer A Arblaster; Jason M Conder; Ian T Cousins; Kavitha Dasu; Barbara J Henry; Linda S Lee; Jinxia Liu; Erica R McKenzie; Janice Willey
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.218

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.