Literature DB >> 31573984

Surgical Quality Assurance in COLOR III: Standardization and Competency Assessment in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Alice Y-C Tsai1, Stella Mavroveli1, Danilo Miskovic1,2, Stefan van Oostendorp3, Michel Adamina4, Roel Hompes5, Felix Aigner6, Antonino Spinelli7, Janindra Warusavitarne2, Joep Knol8, Matthew Albert9, George Nassif9, Willem Bemelman5, Luigi Boni10, Henrik Ovesen11, Ralph Austin12, Andrea Muratore13, Gerald Seitinger14, Colin Sietses15, Antonio M Lacy16, Jurriaan B Tuynman3, H Jaap Bonjer3, George B Hanna1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop an objective and reliable surgical quality assurance system (SQA) for COLOR III, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) with laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer. BACKGROUND OF SUMMARY DATA: SQA influences outcome measures in RCTs such as lymph nodes harvest, in-hospital mortality, and locoregional cancer recurrence. However, levels of SQA are variable.
METHOD: Hierarchical task analysis of TaTME was performed. A 4-round Delphi methodology was applied for standardization of TaTME steps. Semistructured interviews were conducted in round 1 to identify key steps and tasks, which were rated as mandatory, optional, or prohibited in rounds 2 to 4 using questionnaires. Competency assessment tool (CAT) was developed and its content validity was examined by expert surgeons. Twenty unedited videos were assessed to test reliability using generalizability theory.
RESULTS: Eighty-three of 101 surgical tasks identified reached 70% agreement (26 mandatory, 56 optional, and 1 prohibited). An operative guide of standardized TaTME was created. CAT is matrix of 9 steps and 4 performance qualities: exposure, execution, adverse event, and end-product. The overall G-coefficient was 0.883. Inter-rater and interitem reliability were 0.883 and 0.986. To enter COLOR III, 2 unedited TaTME and 1 laparoscopic TME videos were submitted and assessed by 2 independent assessors using CAT.
CONCLUSION: We described an iterative approach to develop an objective SQA within multicenter RCT. This approach provided standardization, the development of reliable and valid CAT, and the criteria for trial entry and monitoring surgical performance during the trial.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31573984     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  9 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a virtual knowledge assessment tool for transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Hamzeh Naghawi; Johnny Chau; Amin Madani; Pepa Kaneva; John Monson; Carmen Mueller; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.699

2.  P338: summarizing measures of proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision-a systematic review.

Authors:  Alen Antoun; Johnny Chau; Nourah Alsharqawi; Pepa Kaneva; Liane S Feldman; Carmen L Mueller; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Development of a surgical competency assessment tool for sentinel lymph node dissection by minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kristen Moloney; Monika Janda; Michael Frumovitz; Mario Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Emma Rossi; James L Nicklin; Marie Plante; Fabrice R Lecuru; Alessandro Buda; Andrea Mariani; Yee Leung; Sarah Elizabeth Ferguson; Rene Pareja; Rainer Kimmig; Pearl Shuang Ye Tong; Orla McNally; Naven Chetty; Kaijiang Liu; Ken Jaaback; Julio Lau; Soon Yau Joseph Ng; Henrik Falconer; Jan Persson; Russell Land; Fabio Martinelli; Andrea Garrett; Alon Altman; Adam Pendlebury; David Cibula; Roberto Altamirano; Donal Brennan; Thomas Edward Ind; Cornelis De Kroon; Ka Yu Tse; George Hanna; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.661

4.  Learning inguinal hernia repair? A survey of current practice and of preferred methods of surgical residents.

Authors:  T Nazari; M E W Dankbaar; D L Sanders; M C J Anderegg; T Wiggers; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  N S Fearnhead; A G Acheson; S R Brown; L Hancock; A Harikrishnan; S B Kelly; C A Maxwell-Armstrong; P M Sagar; S Siddiqi; C J Walsh; J M D Wheeler; J F Abercrombie
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Structured training curriculums for transanal total mesorectal excision in China: refinement is needed.

Authors:  Ximo Xu; Zhenghao Cai; Hong Zhang; Qing Xu; Mingyang Ren; Abe Fingerhut; Dachong Sha; Minhua Zheng; Jianwen Li; Yang Deng; Xiao Yang; Sen Zhang; Batuer Aikemu; Wei Qin; Duohuo Shu; Xinxiang Li; Jun You; Quan Wang; Bo Feng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04

Review 7.  Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: it's come a long way and here to stay.

Authors:  Jing Yu Ng; Chien-Chih Chen
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-29

Review 8.  Role of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kurt A Melstrom; Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Locoregional recurrences after transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer during implementation.

Authors:  S E van Oostendorp; H J Belgers; B T Bootsma; J C Hol; E J T H Belt; W Bleeker; F C Den Boer; A Demirkiran; M S Dunker; H F J Fabry; E J R Graaf; J J Knol; S J Oosterling; G D Slooter; D J A Sonneveld; A K Talsma; H L Van Westreenen; M Kusters; R Hompes; H J Bonjer; C Sietses; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 6.939

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.