Literature DB >> 31573745

Single- and double-Diffusion encoding MRI for studying ex vivo apparent axon diameter distribution in spinal cord white matter.

Debbie Anaby1,2, Darya Morozov1, Inbar Seroussi3, Simon Hametner4, Nir Sochen3,5, Yoram Cohen1,5.   

Abstract

Mapping average axon diameter (AAD) and axon diameter distribution (ADD) in neuronal tissues non-invasively is a challenging task that may have a tremendous effect on our understanding of the normal and diseased central nervous system (CNS). Water diffusion is used to probe microstructure in neuronal tissues, however, the different water populations and barriers that are present in these tissues turn this into a complex task. Therefore, it is not surprising that recently we have witnessed a burst in the development of new approaches and models that attempt to obtain, non-invasively, detailed microstructural information in the CNS. In this work, we aim at challenging and comparing the microstructural information obtained from single diffusion encoding (SDE) with double diffusion encoding (DDE) MRI. We first applied SDE and DDE MR spectroscopy (MRS) on microcapillary phantoms and then applied SDE and DDE MRI on an ex vivo porcine spinal cord (SC), using similar experimental conditions. The obtained diffusion MRI data were fitted by the same theoretical model, assuming that the signal in every voxel can be approximated as the superposition of a Gaussian-diffusing component and a series of restricted components having infinite cylindrical geometries. The diffusion MRI results were then compared with histological findings. We found a good agreement between the fittings and the experimental data in white matter (WM) voxels of the SC in both diffusion MRI methods. The microstructural information and apparent AADs extracted from SDE MRI were found to be similar or somewhat larger than those extracted from DDE MRI especially when the diffusion time was set to 40 ms. The apparent ADDs extracted from SDE and DDE MRI show reasonable agreement but somewhat weaker correspondence was observed between the diffusion MRI results and histology. The apparent subtle differences between the microstructural information obtained from SDE and DDE MRI are briefly discussed.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axon diameter; diffusion MRI; double diffusion encoding (DDE)-MRI; microstructure; spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31573745     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  5 in total

1.  Mapping kidney tubule diameter ex vivo by diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Darya Morozov; Neda Parvin; Jennifer R Charlton; Kevin M Bennett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 2.  MR cell size imaging with temporal diffusion spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Jiang; Hua Li; Sean P Devan; John C Gore; Junzhong Xu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  MRI of tumor T cell infiltration in response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Jiang; Stephanie Dudzinski; Kathryn E Beckermann; Kirsten Young; Eliot McKinley; Oliver J McIntyre; Jeffrey C Rathmell; Junzhong Xu; John C Gore
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 13.751

4.  A simple estimate of axon size with diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Kevin D Harkins; Christian Beaulieu; Junzhong Xu; John C Gore; Mark D Does
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  MRI-cytometry: Mapping nonparametric cell size distributions using diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Junzhong Xu; Xiaoyu Jiang; Sean P Devan; Lori R Arlinghaus; Eliot T McKinley; Jingping Xie; Zhongliang Zu; Qing Wang; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Yong Wang; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.668

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.