| Literature DB >> 31573416 |
Natalia Oli1,2, Abhinav Vaidya2, Gabriele Eiben3, Alexandra Krettek1,3,4.
Abstract
Background: Nepal, like many low- and middle-income countries, exhibits rising burden of cardiovascular diseases. Misconceptions, poor behavior, and a high prevalence of risk factors contribute to this development. Health promotion efforts along with primary prevention strategies, including risk factor reduction in both adults and children, are therefore critical.Entities:
Keywords: Diet; health promotion; mothers; physical activity; young children
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31573416 PMCID: PMC6781231 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1670033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Action ISSN: 1654-9880 Impact factor: 2.640
Figure 1.Map of Jhaukhel–Duwakot Health Demographic Surveillance Site showing the intervention area (wards 1, 6, 7, 8, and 9 in Duwakot), control area (all wards in Jhaukhel), and a buffer zone (wards 2, 3, 4, and 5 in Duwakot); VDC, village development committee (according to old federal structure, before 2017–2018).
Figure 2.Enrollment, intervention allocation and follow-up of the mothers.
Sociodemographic characteristics of mothers in intervention (Duwakot) and control (Jhaukhel) areas during baseline and follow-up.
| Baseline study | Follow-up study | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mothers’ variables | Duwakot | Jhaukhel | Duwakot | Jhaukhel | ||
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≤25 | 104 (23.4) | 62 (21.5) | 0.801 | 123 (19.6) | 130 (20.0) | 0.752 |
| 26–35 | 305 (68.7) | 205 (70.9) | 409 (65.3) | 432 (66.5) | ||
| ≥36 | 35 (7.9) | 22 (7.6) | 94 (15.0) | 88 (13.5) | ||
| Education | ||||||
| <Grade 5 | 120 (27.0) | 56 (19.4) | 0.004 | 137 (21.9) | 124 (19.1) | 0.376 |
| Grade 5–10 | 218 (49.1) | 135 (46.7) | 301 (48.1) | 334 (51.4) | ||
| >Grade 10 | 106 (23.9) | 98 (33.9) | 188 (30.0) | 192 (29.5) | ||
| Religion | ||||||
| Hindu | 405 (91.2) | 268(92.7) | 0.370 | 582 (93.0) | 607 (93.4) | 0.833 |
| Buddhist | 25 (5.6) | 10 (3.5) | 30 (4.8) | 27 (4.2) | ||
| Othersb | 14 (3.2) | 11 (3.8) | 14 (2.2) | 16 (2.5) | ||
| Ethnicityc | ||||||
| Newar | 115 (25.9) | 115 (39.8) | < 0.001 | 142 (22.7) | 305 (46.9) | < 0.001 |
| Brahmin | 66 (14.9) | 86 (29.8) | 76 (12.1) | 117 (18.0) | ||
| Chhetri | 169 (38.1) | 41(14.2) | 273 (43.6) | 103 (15.8) | ||
| Other major hill castesd | 72 (16.2) | 42 (14.5) | 121(19.3) | 115 (17.7) | ||
| Otherse | 22 (5.0) | 5 (1.7) | 14 (2.2) | 10 (1.5) | ||
| Family structure | ||||||
| Nuclear | 275 (61.9) | 121(41.9) | < 0.001 | 542 (86.6) | 456 (70.2) | < 0.001 |
| Extended | 169 (38.1) | 168 (58.1) | 84 (13.4) | 194 (29.8) | ||
| Mothers’ main occupation | ||||||
| Agriculture | 21(4.7) | 3 (1.0) | 0.009 | 29 (4.6) | 99 (15.2) | < 0.001 |
| Office | 15 (3.4) | 9 (3.1) | 23 (3.7) | 19 (2.9) | ||
| Labor | 37 (8.3) | 15 (5.2) | 37 (5.9) | 45 (6.9) | ||
| Self-employed | 48 (10.8) | 46 (15.9) | 61 (9.7) | 96 (14.8) | ||
| Housewife | 323 (72.7) | 216 (74.7) | 476 (76.0) | 391(60.2) | ||
| Average monthly household income (NPR)f | ||||||
| < 10,000 | 92 (22.2) | 88 (32.7) | 0.015 | 74 (11.9) | 137 (21.2) | < 0.001 |
| 10,000–19,999 | 209 (50.4) | 113 (42.0) | 330 (53.0) | 353 (54.7) | ||
| 20,000–29,999 | 56 (13.5) | 42 (15.6) | 107 (17.2) | 105 (16.3) | ||
| 30,000–39,999 | 27 (6.5) | 11 (4.1) | 46 (7.4) | 16 (2.5) | ||
| > 40,000 | 31 (7.5) | 15 (5.6) | 66 (10.6) | 34 (5.3) | ||
| Total | ||||||
aObtained from a χ2 test
bOther religion includes Christianity and Islam.
cClassification of ethnic groups is based on the National Central Bureau of Statistics in Nepal [35].
dOther major hill castes include Tamang, Dalit, Thakuri, Magar, and Rai.
eOther ethnicity includes Lama, Sherpa, Madeshi, Gurung, Tharu.
fNPR = Nepalese rupees (1 USD = NPR 101.6 approximately).
Figure 3.Effectiveness of the health promotion intervention on mothers’ knowledge (a), attitude (b), and practice (c) regarding diet and physical activity. Note: Maximum possible scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice were 73, 192 and 17, respectively.
Figure 4.Effectiveness of the health promotion intervention on children’s behavior.
Maximum possible score = 110.
Effectiveness of the intervention on mothers’ KAP and children's behavior as perceived by mothers regarding diet and physical activity.
| Intervention area (Duwakot) | Control area (Jhaukhel) | Impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline mean (SD) | Follow-up mean (SD) | Baseline mean (SD) | Follow-up mean (SD) | Difference in differences | 95% CI | |
| Knowledge | 54.6 (7.5) | 61.2 (6.7) | 56.2 (6.2) | 56.9 (6.0) | 5.8 | (4.6; 7.0) |
| Attitude | 139.8 (15.3) | 148.2 (12.7) | 141.7 (13.1) | 143.3 (11.6) | 6.9 | (4.5; 9.3) |
| Practice | 6.7 (1.4) | 10.1 (1.8) | 7.1 (1.3) | 4.5 (2) | 6.0 | (5.6; 6.3) |
| Children’s behavior | 71.6 (4.9) | 72.1 (5.2) | 71.9 (4.7) | 67.1 (4.3) | 5.2 | (4.3; 6.1) |
Effectiveness of the intervention was measured using DiD estimates from a linear regression model.
DiD analysis according to mothers’ and children’s demographic variables.
| Mothers | Children | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge DiD (95%CI) | Attitude DiD (95%CI) | Practice DiD (95%CI) | Practice DiD (95%CI) | |
| Mothers’ variables | ||||
| Age (years) | ||||
| ≤25 | 6.0 (3.1; 8.8) | 4.4 (−1.1; 9.8) | 5.7 (5.0; 6.4) | 4.4 (2.6; 6.2) |
| 26–35 | 6.4 (5.0; 7.8) | 8.1 (5.2; 10.9) | 6.0 (5.6; 6.4) | 5.3 (4.2; 6.4) |
| ≥36 | 0.2 (−4.1; 4.4) | 2.5 (−5.6; 10.6) | 6.2 (5.2; 7.2) | 6.6 (3.7; 9.4) |
| Education | ||||
| <grade 5 | 5.2 (2.5; 7.9) | 4.1 (−1.0; 9.2) | 6.4 (5.8; 7.1) | 3.4 (1.6; 5.3) |
| grade 5–10 | 4.5 (2.9; 6.2) | 4.7 (1.4; 8.0) | 5.6 (5.1; 6.0) | 5.1 (3.8; 6.3) |
| >grade 10 | 5.7 (3.9; 7.5) | 6.9 (3.0; 10.8) | 6.2 (5.6;6.8) | 6.4 (4.8; 8.1) |
| Main occupation | ||||
| Agriculture | 4.8 (−3.1; 12.8) | 16.7 (1.2; 32.2) | 5.1 (2.9; 7.3) | −1.7 (−7.9; 4.5) |
| Office | −0.7 (−6.4; 5.0) | 0.3 (−12.4; 12.9) | 6.0 (4.2; 7.9) | 5.8 (0.5; 11.1) |
| Labor | 1.8 (−4.1; 7.5) | 4.0 (−6.6; 14.6) | 5.9 (4.8; 6.9) | 2.2 (−1.8; 6.2) |
| Self-employed | 3.5 (0.6; 6.5) | 7.2 (1.1; 13.3) | 5.3 (4.4; 6.3) | 6.9 (4.2; 9.5) |
| Housewife | 6.0 (4.6; 7.4) | 4.5 (1.7; 7.3) | 6.1 (5.7; 6.5) | 5.5 (4.5; 6.5) |
| Children’s variables | ||||
| Age (years) | ||||
| 1–4 | 5.7 (4.1; 7.3) | 3.8 (0.7; 7.0) | 5.6 (5.2; 6.1) | 5.6 (4.4; 6.7) |
| 5–9 | 5.5 (3.5; 7.6) | 10.4 (6.4; 14.4) | 6.4 (5.9; 6.9) | 4.6 (3.1; 6.1) |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 5.1 (3.4; 6.8) | 6.3 (3.1; 9.6) | 5.9 (5.4; 6.3) | 4.7 (3.5; 5.9) |
| Female | 6.7 (5.0; 8.5) | 7.4 (3.8; 11.0) | 6.1 (5.7; 6.6) | 5.8 (4.5; 7.2) |
DiD = Difference in Differences.
The effectiveness of the intervention was measured using DiD estimates from a linear regression model. Numbers show DiD of mean score between intervention and control areas at baseline and follow-up across various subcategories of mothers’ and children’s demographic variables.