| Literature DB >> 31572331 |
Bibo Li1, Ke Zhang1, Chao Li1, Xiaolong Wang1, Yulin Chen1, Yuxin Yang1.
Abstract
Bacterial communities in gastrointestinal tracts (GIT) play an important role in animal health and performance. Despite its importance, little information is available on the establishment of microbial populations in the goat GIT or on changes occurring during early development. Therefore, this study investigated the bacterial community dynamics of the rumen, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon in 15 goats at five developmental stages (0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 days old) by using 16S rDNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR technology. 940 genera were found to belong to 44 phyla distributed along the GIT. As a whole, the microbial richness and diversity showed a clear increasing trend as the kids aged and alpha diversity differed significantly among GIT compartments mainly occurring at middle day ages (14 and 28 days). Principal coordinate analysis indicated that the bacterial community displayed distinct temporal and spatial specificity along the GIT in preweaning goats. As kids aged, the phylum Firmicutes was replaced by Bacteroidetes in rumen, whereas Proteobacteria in the large intestine was displaced by Firmicutes. The phylum Proteobacteria was mainly present in the small intestine in older animals. In the rumen, taxa, such as Bacillus and Lactococcus decreased and Prevotella, Treponema, Ruminococcus, and unclassified Prevotellaceae increased with the age of kids. Furthermore, a lower proportion of taxa, such as Lactobacillus and Bacteroides was observed with higher abundances of both Christensenellaceae_R_7 and Ruminococcus in duodenum and jejunum in older animals. In the large intestine, the microbiota displayed taxonomic dynamics with increases of Ruminococcaceae UCG 005, unclassified Lachnospiraceae, Barnesiella, and Blautia as kids aged. Predicted pathway analysis suggested that genes involved in amino acid metabolism, and translation were abundant in both rumen and duodenum, while genes involved in membrane transport and carbohydrate metabolism were enriched in the large intestine. These results indicate that both the microbial colonization process and potential function exert a temporal-spatial specificity throughout the GIT of goats. This study provides new insight into the temporal dynamics of GIT microbiota development during preweaning and will aid to develop strategies for improving animal health and downstream production.Entities:
Keywords: gastrointestinal tract; microbiota; preweaning; ruminant; temporal-spatial specificity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31572331 PMCID: PMC6753876 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Alpha diversity of the bacterial community within each age group across the gastrointestinal tract. The richness and diversity were calculated via Chao (A) and Shannon (B) indexes, respectively. Boxplots indicate significant differences among ages within a given GIT region.
Figure 2Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) profile of microbial diversity using the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity metric. The percentage of variation explained by PC1 and PC2 are indicated on the axis. (A) PCoA of bacterial microbiota across all samples. (B) PCoA of bacterial microbiota according to age group in each GIT region. (C) PCoA of bacterial community according to gastrointestinal tract (GIT) regions for each age group.
Figure 3Microbiota composition at the phylum level. (A) Bacterial community composition changes as kids aged in each gastrointestinal tract (GIT) region. (B) Comparison of relative abundances of the three main bacterial phyla (Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria) among age groups throughout the GIT region. Bars with a star symbol above their whiskers are significantly different between age groups in each GIT compartment using one-way ANOVA analysis; *0.01 < P < 0.05; **0.001 < P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4Main common genera across the gastrointestinal tract regions. (A) Venn diagram of bacterial genera shared between rumen, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon. (B) Relative proportion of predominant common genera (those with an average proportion ≥1% based on all common genera were selected from 279 shared genera. (C) Changes of 23 common dominant genera as kids aged in each GIT region. The red, green, and blue dots represent genera that belong to the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria, respectively. The size of the dot represents the relative abundance of microbiota.
Figure 5Metagenomic functional predictions. (A) Variations in KEGG metabolic pathways of microbiota at different ages throughout the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) region of kids. (B) PCoA profile of microbial functional KEGG pathways using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity metric according to the abundance of metabolic pathways. (C) Comparison of the predominant KEGG metabolic pathways in each age group. (D) Interaction heatmap between the predominant common bacterial genera and potential functional KEGG pathways (at the KEEG level 3); *0.01 < P < 0.05; **0.001 < P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Comparison of the six dominant KEGG gene pathways among different GIT regions.
| Membrane transport | 9.97a | 10.53a | 11.73b | 12.19bc | 13.22d | 13.11cd | 0.18 | 0.001 |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | 10.35 | 10.32 | 10.50 | 10.17 | 10.70 | 10.61 | 0.06 | 0.114 |
| Amino acid metabolism | 10.20b | 10.17b | 9.68ab | 9.99ab | 9.56a | 9.54a | 0.08 | 0.042 |
| Replication and repair | 9.42b | 8.95ab | 8.69a | 8.37a | 8.55a | 8.57a | 0.09 | 0.012 |
| Energy metabolism | 5.73 | 5.72 | 5.52 | 5.52 | 5.70 | 5.68 | 0.03 | 0.088 |
| Translation | 6.06c | 5.68bc | 5.46ab | 5.17a | 5.34ab | 5.33ab | 0.07 | 0.001 |
Mean values with different superscripted lowercase letters within the same row differed significantly (P < 0.05). SEM, standard error of the mean.
Total bacterial numbers (log10 gene copies/g of digesta sample) attached to different GIT site from 0 to 56 d.
| Rumen | – | 10.22C | 9.93C | 10.62C | 10.70E | 10.37D | 0.19 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Duodenum | 6.61aB | 7.20bA | 8.08cB | 7.90cA | 8.61dC | 7.68B | ||||
| Jejunum | 6.63aB | 6.79aA | 6.83aA | 8.79cB | 7.62bB | 7.33B | ||||
| Ileum | 5.66aAB | 6.40abA | 6.67bA | 8.70cB | 6.49abA | 6.78A | ||||
| Cecum | 4.79aA | 8.48bB | 9.89cdC | 10.39dC | 9.14bcD | 8.54C | ||||
| Colon | 5.54aAB | 9.63bC | 10.43bC | 10.38bC | 9.39bD | 9.07C | ||||
| A | 5.85a | 8.12b | 8.64c | 9.46d | 8.66c | |||||
Mean values with different superscripted lowercase letters within the same row differ significantly (P < 0.05) while with different superscripted capital letters within the same column means differ significantly (P < 0.05).
The blank represents that the DNA sample is not enough to perform the quantitative real-time PCR.
SEM, standard error of the difference of the means.
Probability of a significant effect due to GIT sites (G), day-old ages (A), and their interaction (G × A).