Literature DB >> 31572202

Editorial: Establishing Genetic Pleiotropy to Identify Common Pharmacological Agents for Common Diseases.

Tracy A O'Mara1, Jyotsna Batra2, Dylan Glubb1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP19A1; GWAS; drug repurposing; drug target; endometrial cancer; pharmacogenetics; pleiotropy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31572202      PMCID: PMC6753863          DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pharmacol        ISSN: 1663-9812            Impact factor:   5.810


× No keyword cloud information.
Pleiotropy, the phenomenon where one gene affects multiple traits, appears to be pervasive in biology. For example, findings from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) demonstrate that GWAS loci for different traits overlap nearly 50% of the time (Chesmore et al., 2018). Often these traits are related, as is illustrated by GWAS of endometrial cancer risk, where all 16 known loci contain variation that has been associated with other traits, including susceptibility to other cancer types as well as known risk factors for endometrial cancer (e.g., body mass index and age of menarche) (O’Mara et al., 2019). Recently, it has been shown that drugs with genetically supported targets, including those identified by GWAS, are more likely to receive clinical approval than drugs whose targets are not supported by genetic evidence (Nelson et al., 2015; King et al., 2019). This effect is strongest when the causal gene underlying the genetic association has been established (e.g., Mendelian genes), highlighting an inherent problem with clinical translation of findings from GWAS, i.e., identifying the target genes of, primarily, non-coding genetic variation (Farashi et al., 2019; O’Mara et al., 2019). Even though a variety of bioinformatic and functional genomic approaches can be used for this purpose, and many data are publicly available (Pritchard et al.), this step appears to constitute a major bottleneck (Gallagher and Chen-Plotkin, 2018). It has been estimated that 4,479 human genes encode proteins that are druggable, 1,427 of which are targets of drugs that either have been approved or are in clinical testing (Finan et al., 2017). In light of these and the observations above, the human genome may provide a source of effective targets for therapy. Furthermore, many public databases, using various types of evidence, can be queried to link genes to drugs or experimental compounds (Pritchard et al.). It is thus apparent that if a genetic study of disease identifies a target for which a drug already exists, then that drug may be able to be repurposed (or repositioned) to treat or serve as co-therapy to the new indication. Drug repurposing is not without caveats, though. The repurposed drug may still need to undergo pre-clinical validation (Pritchard et al.) before the repurposing is tested clinically, especially if there is limited evidence to demonstrate that the drug affects the function of the target. Also, issues with the patentability mean drug repurposing may be of less interest to pharmaceutical companies (Pritchard et al.). As well as providing further indications for drug repurposing, pleiotropic drug targets may offer additional support for targeting. An example of such a pleiotropic target is provided by CYP19A1. Endometrial cancer GWAS risk variation at the CYP19A1 gene also associates with circulating estradiol, which itself is causal for endometrial cancer (Thompson et al., 2016). CYP19A1 encodes aromatase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the production of estradiol, which is targeted by aromatase inhibitors (used in the treatment of breast cancer). These drugs have been repurposed to treat endometrial cancer with some evidence of benefit for early-stage but not advanced disease (reviewed in Gao et al., 2014). However, it is possible that genetic markers could be used to identify patients with advanced disease who may receive benefit. Pharmacogenetic studies of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer suggest that genetic variation in linkage disequilibrium with the pleiotropic CYP19A1 GWAS variation may associate with better outcomes in advanced disease (Glubb et al.), though further studies are required to validate this finding. Pharmacokinetic-related genes (i.e. those involved with drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion) are very often pleiotropic because they can affect traits related to exposure to multiple drugs or xenobiotics. Two examples are CYP2C19 and SLCO1B1, which are associated with drug metabolism and transport, respectively. Both genes are highly pleiotropic with CYP2C19 and SLCO1B1 having been associated with responses to large numbers of drugs (588 for CYP2C19 and 56 for SLCO1B1) (Cacabelos et al., 2019), including the pharmacokinetic profile of the antiplatelet agent ticagrelor as described in the current Research Topic (Zhu et al.) Further analysis of these two genes, and their pharmacogenetic variants, in phenome-wide association studies demonstrates that their pleiotropy may extend to the risk of common disease (Oetjens et al., 2016). TRIB3 is another pleiotropic gene with potential to inform drug therapy. A TRIB3 missense variant (rs2295490) has been associated with early-onset type 2 diabetes, higher glucose levels in healthy controls (Prudente et al., 2009), and reduced risk of vascular events among type 2 diabetes patients with good glucose control (He et al., 2016). A study of patients with essential hypertension, presented in this Research Topic, indicates that rs2295490 may also associate with better vascular outcomes for patients treated with calcium channel blockers, angiotensin blockers, and α, β-adrenoceptor antagonists (Zhou et al.). In conclusion, it is evident that pleiotropy offers the potential to identify drugs to treat common disease, and pleiotropic targets have advantages, particularly over those with no genetic basis. Moreover, establishing pleiotropy may provide an approach to prioritize targets for evaluation and identify genes that also affect clinical drug responses.

Author Contributions

DG drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and approved the submitted version for publication.

Funding

TO’M and JB are supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career (APP1090505) and Career Development Fellowships, respectively.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  12 in total

Review 1.  The role of pharmacogenomics in adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Ramón Cacabelos; Natalia Cacabelos; Juan C Carril
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.045

Review 2.  Post-GWAS in prostate cancer: from genetic association to biological contribution.

Authors:  Samaneh Farashi; Thomas Kryza; Judith Clements; Jyotsna Batra
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Evidence for extensive pleiotropy among pharmacogenes.

Authors:  Matthew T Oetjens; William S Bush; Joshua C Denny; Kelly Birdwell; Nuri Kodaman; Anurag Verma; Holli H Dilks; Sarah A Pendergrass; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  The ubiquity of pleiotropy in human disease.

Authors:  Kevin Chesmore; Jacquelaine Bartlett; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  The Post-GWAS Era: From Association to Function.

Authors:  Michael D Gallagher; Alice S Chen-Plotkin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  The therapeutic significance of aromatase inhibitors in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Chao Gao; Yingmei Wang; Wenyan Tian; Yuanxi Zhu; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  The TRIB3 Q84R polymorphism and risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sabrina Prudente; Daniela Scarpelli; Manisha Chandalia; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Eleonora Morini; Silvia Del Guerra; Francesco Perticone; Rong Li; Christine Powers; Francesco Andreozzi; Piero Marchetti; Bruno Dallapiccola; Nicola Abate; Alessandro Doria; Giorgio Sesti; Vincenzo Trischitta
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  The druggable genome and support for target identification and validation in drug development.

Authors:  Chris Finan; Anna Gaulton; Felix A Kruger; R Thomas Lumbers; Tina Shah; Jorgen Engmann; Luana Galver; Ryan Kelley; Anneli Karlsson; Rita Santos; John P Overington; Aroon D Hingorani; Juan P Casas
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Assessment of Human Tribbles Homolog 3 Genetic Variation (rs2295490) Effects on Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Glucose Control and Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment.

Authors:  Fazhong He; Mouze Liu; Zhangren Chen; Guojing Liu; Zhenmin Wang; Rong Liu; Jianquan Luo; Jie Tang; Xingyu Wang; Xin Liu; Honghao Zhou; Xiaoping Chen; Zhaoqian Liu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  CYP19A1 fine-mapping and Mendelian randomization: estradiol is causal for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Deborah J Thompson; Tracy A O'Mara; Dylan M Glubb; Jodie N Painter; Timothy Cheng; Elizabeth Folkerd; Deborah Doody; Joe Dennis; Penelope M Webb; Maggie Gorman; Lynn Martin; Shirley Hodgson; Kyriaki Michailidou; Jonathan P Tyrer; Mel J Maranian; Per Hall; Kamila Czene; Hatef Darabi; Jingmei Li; Peter A Fasching; Alexander Hein; Matthias W Beckmann; Arif B Ekici; Thilo Dörk; Peter Hillemanns; Matthias Dürst; Ingo Runnebaum; Hui Zhao; Jeroen Depreeuw; Stefanie Schrauwen; Frederic Amant; Ellen L Goode; Brooke L Fridley; Sean C Dowdy; Stacey J Winham; Helga B Salvesen; Jone Trovik; Tormund S Njolstad; Henrica M J Werner; Katie Ashton; Tony Proietto; Geoffrey Otton; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Emma Tham; Tao Liu; Miriam Mints; Rodney J Scott; Mark McEvoy; John Attia; Elizabeth G Holliday; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Dale R Nyholt; Anjali K Henders; John L Hopper; Nadia Traficante; Matthias Ruebner; Anthony J Swerdlow; Barbara Burwinkel; Hermann Brenner; Alfons Meindl; Hiltrud Brauch; Annika Lindblom; Diether Lambrechts; Jenny Chang-Claude; Fergus J Couch; Graham G Giles; Vessela N Kristensen; Angela Cox; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Stig E Bojesen; Mitul Shah; Robert Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paul D P Pharoah; Alison M Dunning; Ian Tomlinson; Mitch Dowsett; Douglas F Easton; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.678

View more
  2 in total

1.  PolarMorphism enables discovery of shared genetic variants across multiple traits from GWAS summary statistics.

Authors:  Joanna von Berg; Michelle Ten Dam; Sander W van der Laan; Jeroen de Ridder
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.931

2.  Phenotypic screening of low molecular weight compounds is rich ground for repurposed, on-target drugs.

Authors:  Christopher A Lipinski; Andrew G Reaume
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.