| Literature DB >> 31571687 |
Vibhavari M Naik1, S Shyam Prasad Mantha1, Basanth Kumar Rayani1.
Abstract
Securing stable vascular access is an important clinical skill for the anaesthesiologist. Sick children, complex surgeries, chronic illnesses, multiple hospitalisations, and prolonged treatments can make vascular access challenging. A search was done in the English language literature using the keywords "paediatric," "vascular access," "venous access," and "techniques" or "complications" in Pubmed, Embase, and Google scholar databases. Articles were screened and appropriate content was included. Intraosseous access is a lifesaving technique that can be performed even in hypovolaemic patients rapidly. Transillumination and near-infrared light improve visualisation of superficial veins in difficult access. Ultrasonography has become the standard of care in selecting the vessel, size of catheter, guide placement, and prevent complications. Fluoroscopy is used during insertion of long-term vascular access devices. This article reviews the various routes of access, their indications, most appropriate site, securing techniques, advantages, disadvantages, and complications associated with vascular access in children. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Paediatric; vascular access; vascular access complications; vascular access techniques; venous access
Year: 2019 PMID: 31571687 PMCID: PMC6761776 DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_489_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Anaesth ISSN: 0019-5049
Figure 1(a and b) Overview of Vascular Access in Children. (a) depicts the types of vascular access. (* Only in neonates, † Peripherally inserted central catheter, and ‡ In neonates and infants).(b) depicts the decision tree for venous access in children. (* Non-tunneled central line preferred if critically ill or haemodynamic monitoring needed; † Tunneled central catheters preferred if wide bore access desired; ‡ Implanted ports preferred if wide bore access not necessary)
Figure 2Techniques for difficult peripheral venous cannulation. (a) shows dorsum of hand with non-visible and non-palpable veins. Inset shows adult and paediatric infrared vein visualizing device. (b and c) show veins visualised by infrared and transillumination techniques, respectively
Comparison of different vascular accesses
| Type of access | Common sites | Catheter sizes | Dwell time | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral venous access | Dorsum of hand and leg, antecubital, great saphenous vein, external jugular, scalp veins | 26 G, 24 G (neonates) | Short termUp to 5 days | Simple, cost effective, minimal complications | Short term, can’t withdraw blood |
| Midline access | Deep veins of arm or forearm | 24 G (neonates) | Intermediate-termUp to 14 days | Longer dwell time, ease of insertion, no radiological confirmation needed | Can’t withdraw blood, only peripherally compatible solutions can be used |
| PICC (peripheral inserted central catheter) access | Basillic vein, brachial vein, cephalic vein (size of catheter <one-third of vein diameter) | 1 Fr (neonates) | Intermediate-term | Blood sampling possible, patient can be sent home | Needs training and expertise, radiological confirmation needed, device care patient training required |
| Non-tunneled central venous access | Internal jugular, subclavian, and femoral veins | 3 Fr (neonates) | Short term | Multiple lumens, CVP monitoring, hyperosmolar, and irritant drugs | Limited duration use due to the risk of infection, Patient cannot be sent home |
| Tunneled central venous access (Hickmann’s/Broviac) | Subclavian vein, internal jugular veins (right side preferably) | 4.2 Fr Broviac (infants) | Long term | Blood sampling possible, high rate of infusion and blood draw possible | Needs training and expertise, radiological confirmation needed, costly device, device care patient training required, needs surgical removal |
| Implantable port access | Subclavian vein, internal jugular | 4 Fr (infants) | Long term >3 months to few years | Longevity of access, least chances of infection, preserves body image | Elaborate placement technique, costly device, needs surgical removal |
| Intra-osseous access | Proximal tibia, distal tibia, distal femur, proximal humerus | 15 G needles | Emergency access <24 hours | Useful in emergency settings, quick access, requires less skill and training than central venous access | Require simple training |
| Arterial access | Radial artery, ulnar artery, femoral artery, Posterior tibial | 24 G (neonates) | Short term | Beat to beat blood pressure monitoring, blood gas sampling | Arterial injury, arterial occlusion |
| Umbilical access (venous and arterial) | Umbilical cord | 3.5 Fr for low birth weight babies, 5 Fr for term neonates | Short term | Useful in emergency settings, easy access, frequent blood sampling | Requires simple training |
G - Gauge; Fr – French; *Up to a year if catheter is viable
Figure 3Common vascular access locations for peripheral venous access (light blue), central venous access (dark blue), arterial access (red), and intraosseous access (green)
Common complications of vascular access
| Early | Late |
|---|---|
| Complications of peripheral venous access | |
| Bleeding | Thrombophlebitis |
| Hematoma | Extravasation |
| Complications of central venous access | |
| Arrhythmia | Bloodstream infection |
| Injury to adjacent structures | Catheter occlusion |
| Pneumothorax | Vein thrombosis |
| Malposition | Catheter damage |
| Air embolisation | Vein perforation |
| Complications of arterial access | |
| Bleeding | Distal ischaemia |
| Hematoma | Aneurysm |
| Injury to adjacent structures | Arterial thrombosis |
| Complications of intraosseous access | |
| Hematoma | Cellulitis |
| Extravasation | Compartment syndrome |
| Bone fracture | Osteomyelitis |
| Complications of umbilical access | |
| Vessel perforation | Infection |
| Malposition | Vessel thrombosis |
| False tract | Catheter damage |
Selection of venous access based on infusate properties
| Infusate property | Central venous access | Peripheral venous access |
|---|---|---|
| pH | < 5 and >9 | between 5 and 9 |
| Osmolarity | >600 mOsm/L | < 600 mOsm/L |
| Final dextrose concentration | > 10% | < 10% |
| Tonicity | Hypo/hypertonic | Isotonic |
| Irritant, Vesicant | Yes | No |