Literature DB >> 31570926

Rural independent and corporate Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-authorized store owners' and managers' perceived feasibility to implement marketing-mix and choice-architecture strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases.

Bailey Houghtaling1, Elena Serrano2, Liza Dobson2, Susan Chen1, Vivica I Kraak1, Samantha M Harden1, George C Davis3, Sarah Misyak2.   

Abstract

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants could benefit from exposure to marketing-mix and choice-architecture (MMCA) strategies that encourage healthy consumer purchases. However, the perceived feasibility of independent and corporate SNAP-authorized store owners and managers (e.g., retailers) to implement healthy MMCA strategies is understudied. The purpose of this study was to inform a healthy food retail program that meets both public health and business expectations by prioritizing retailer perspectives. A mixed methods approach was used. Retailers completed a card sorting exercise to determine perceived feasibility to implement MMCA strategies place, profile, portion, pricing, promotion, priming, prompting, and proximity. This process was audio-recorded. Chi-square was used to identify potential differences in perceived feasibility to implement healthy MMCA strategies between independent and corporate SNAP-authorized retailers. Qualitative data were coded among a panel to construct themes. Themes were organized by barriers and facilitators and coded for strategy acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. SNAP-authorized retailers' (n = 29) considered prompting (e.g., labeling; 83%) and proximity (e.g., location; 90%) strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases highly feasible. Few differences were detected between independent and corporate retailers' perceived feasibility to implement healthy MMCA strategies. The largest barriers to implementing healthy MMCA strategies were related to strategy appropriateness. Priorities for healthy food retail initiatives included prompting and proximity changes that highlight products aligned with the DGA, without altering products available to consumers that are misaligned with the DGA. Future work is required to understand how other healthy MMCA strategies may be adapted to enhance their appropriateness for these settings. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choice architecture; Food environment; Manager; Marketing mix; Owner; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31570926     DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  6 in total

Review 1.  A rapid review of stocking and marketing practices used to sell sugar-sweetened beverages in U.S. food stores.

Authors:  Bailey Houghtaling; Denise Holston; Courtney Szocs; Jerrod Penn; Danyi Qi; Valisa Hedrick
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 2.  Improving Healthy Food Choices in Low-Income Settings in the United States Using Behavioral Economic-Based Adaptations to Choice Architecture.

Authors:  Emma Anderson; Ruobin Wei; Binkai Liu; Rachel Plummer; Heather Kelahan; Martha Tamez; Abrania Marrero; Shilpa Bhupathiraju; Josiemer Mattei
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-10-06

3.  What is the availability, affordability, and quality of foods and beverages aligned with dietary guidance in Louisiana Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) authorized stores?

Authors:  Bailey Houghtaling; Melissa Cater; De'Jerra Bryant; Allie Brooks; Denise Holston
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-09-28

4.  Identifying barriers and facilitators in the development and implementation of government-led food environment policies: a systematic review.

Authors:  SeeHoe Ng; Heather Yeatman; Bridget Kelly; Sreelakshmi Sankaranarayanan; Tilakavati Karupaiah
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.846

5.  Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-authorized retailers received a low score using the Business Impact Assessment for Obesity and population-level nutrition (BIA-Obesity) tool.

Authors:  Bailey Houghtaling; Tessa Englund; Susan Chen; Nila Pradhananga; Vivica I Kraak; Elena Serrano; Samantha M Harden; George C Davis; Sarah Misyak
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Community-Based Efforts Aim to Improve the Food Environment within a Highly Obese Rural Appalachian County.

Authors:  Rachel Gillespie; Emily DeWitt; Heather Norman-Burgdolf; Brynnan Dunnaway; Alison Gustafson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.