Tommaso Susini1, Irene Renda2, Milo Giani2, Arianna Vallario2, Jacopo Nori3, Ermanno Vanzi3, Alessandro Innocenti4, Giulia Lo Russo4, Simonetta Bianchi5. 1. Breast Unit, Gynecology Section, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy tommaso.susini@unifi.it. 2. Breast Unit, Gynecology Section, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. 3. Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy. 4. Plastic and Reconstructive Sugery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy. 5. Pathology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Recently, "conservative" mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (M-R) has become the gold standard when the breast must be removed. We analyzed the evolution in the choice of mastectomy type in our Unit, focusing on factors associated with renounce to reconstruction and risk factors for its failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical-pathological and surgical features of 132 patients who underwent mastectomy in our Unit from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed. M-R rate and different mastectomy techniques' rates between 2004-2009 and 2010-2016 were compared. RESULTS: M-R was associated with younger age at diagnosis (p<0.001) and early tumor stage (p=0.03). M-R rate increased from 49.1% to 72.2% (p=0.002) in the last years, with prominent use of nipple-sparing-mastectomy (p<0.001). M-R failure rate was associated with previous or subsequent irradiation/chemotherapy in 92.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: M-R and particularly nipple-sparing-mastectomy represented the standard in more recent years; reconstruction failure was associated with irradiation/chemotherapy, especially in implant-based reconstructions. Copyright
BACKGROUND/AIM: Recently, "conservative" mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (M-R) has become the gold standard when the breast must be removed. We analyzed the evolution in the choice of mastectomy type in our Unit, focusing on factors associated with renounce to reconstruction and risk factors for its failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical-pathological and surgical features of 132 patients who underwent mastectomy in our Unit from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed. M-R rate and different mastectomy techniques' rates between 2004-2009 and 2010-2016 were compared. RESULTS: M-R was associated with younger age at diagnosis (p<0.001) and early tumor stage (p=0.03). M-R rate increased from 49.1% to 72.2% (p=0.002) in the last years, with prominent use of nipple-sparing-mastectomy (p<0.001). M-R failure rate was associated with previous or subsequent irradiation/chemotherapy in 92.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: M-R and particularly nipple-sparing-mastectomy represented the standard in more recent years; reconstruction failure was associated with irradiation/chemotherapy, especially in implant-based reconstructions. Copyright
Authors: Ci-Qiu Yang; Fei Ji; Hong-Fei Gao; Liu-Lu Zhang; Mei Yang; Teng Zhu; Min-Yi Chen; Jie-Qing Li; Kun Wang Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 3.989