| Literature DB >> 31569620 |
Rafaela Z C Meira1, Isabela F B Biscaia1, Camila Nogueira1, Fabio S Murakami2, Larissa S Bernardi1, Paulo R Oliveira3.
Abstract
The physical and chemical characterization of the solid-state properties of drugs and excipients is fundamental for planning new formulations and developing new strategies for the treatment of diseases. Techniques such as differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetry, X-ray powder diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy are among the most commonly used techniques for these purposes. Penciclovir and lysine are individually used to treat the herpes virus. As such, the development of a formulation containing both drugs may have therapeutic potential. Solid-state characterization showed that both penciclovir and lysine were crystalline materials with melting points at 278.27 °C and 260.91 °C, respectively. Compatibility studies of penciclovir and lysine indicated a possible interaction between these substances, as evidenced by a single melting point at 253.10 °C. The compatibility of several excipients, including ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, cetostearyl alcohol, sodium lauryl sulphate, di-tert-butyl methyl phenol, liquid petrolatum, methylparaben, nonionic wax, paraffin, propylene glycol, and propylparaben, was evaluated in ternary (penciclovir-lysine-excipient) mixtures (1:1:1, w/w/w) to determine the optimal formulation. The developed formulation was stable under accelerated and ambient conditions, which demonstrated that the interaction between penciclovir and lysine was suitable for the development of a formulation containing both drugs.Entities:
Keywords: characterization; compatibility; differential scanning calorimetry; excipients; lysine; penciclovir; thermogravimetry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31569620 PMCID: PMC6803830 DOI: 10.3390/ma12193154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Molecular structure of penciclovir (PCV) and lysine (LYS).
Figure 2Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of PCV, LYS, and PCV-LYS mixture.
Figure 3X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) analysis of PCV, LYS and PCV-LYS.
Figure 4Infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of PCV, LYS and PCV-LYS.
Position and assignment of PCV and LYS FTIR bands.
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1 | N–H (aliphatic) | 3400 |
| 2 | N–H (cyclic) | 3313/3126 |
| 3 | CH2 (symmetrical vibration) | 2885 |
| 4 | C=O | 1683 |
| 5 | C–O and C–N | 1381/1310/1176 |
| 6 | C–H (off-plane folds) | 848 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| 1 | H–O–H | 3366 |
| 2 | C–H | 3087 |
| 3 | N–H | 3000-2800 |
| 4 | NH2 | 2200/1900 |
| 5 | C=O | 1624/1425 |
| 6 | C–N | 1045 |
| 7 | H–Cl and C=O (deformations) | 735/705/663 |
Figure 5Photomicrographs of PCV, LYS, and PCV-LYS using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (2880×).
Tpeak temperatures of the main event in the DSC curves of PCV, LYS, and binary and ternary mixtures. Ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), cetostearyl alcohol (CET ALC), sodium lauryl sulphate (LAURYL), di-tert-butyl methyl phenol (BHT), liquid petrolatum (LIQ PET), methylparaben (METHYL), nonionic wax (POLAWAX), paraffin (PARAFF), propylene glycol (PROP GLY), propylparaben (PROPYL).
| Sample | Ratio (Drug:Drug or Drug:Drug: Excipient) | Tpeak/°C |
|---|---|---|
| PCV | - | 278.27 |
| LYS | - | 260.92 |
| PCV-LYS | 1:1 | 253.10 |
| EDTA-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 252.18 |
| PROPYL-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 251.41 |
| METHYL-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 251.85 |
| BHT-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 251.76 |
| PARAFF-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 252.86 |
| LAURYL-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 253.37 |
| POLAWAX-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 252.67 |
| CET ALC-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 222.74 |
| PROP GLY-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 253.85 |
| LIQ PET-PCV-LYS | 1:1:1 | 257.62 |
Figure 6DSC curves of EDTA-PCV-LYS, PROPYL-PCV-LYS, METHYL-PCV-LYS, BHT-PCV-LYS and PARAFF-PCV-LYS.
Figure 7DSC curves for LAURYL-PCV-LYS, POLAWAX-PCV-LYS, CET ALC-PCV-LYS, PROP GLY-PCV-LYS and LIQ PET-PCV-LYS.
Analysis of PVC-LYS content in formulations subjected to accelerated stability conditions.
| Conditions | PCV Assay (%) ± RSD * | LYS Assay (%) ± RSD * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Month | 6 Months | 0 Month | 6 Months | |
| 5 ± 2 °C | 100.24 ± 0.55 | 98.60 ± 0.39 | 99.76 ± 0.37 | 97.91 ± 1.01 |
| 25 ± 2 °C | 100.24 ± 0.55 | 98.53 ± 0.50 | 99.76 ± 0.37 | 98.69 ± 0.94 |
| 40 ± 2 °C | 100.24 ± 0.55 | 97.84 ± 1.08 | 99.76 ± 0.37 | 97.72 ± 1.21 |
* RSD, relative standard deviation (n = 3).